Literature DB >> 21580083

3-Dimethyl-amino-1-(4-methyl-phen-yl)prop-2-en-1-one.

Juean Deng1, Dongsheng Shen, Zongzhou Zhou.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(12)H(15)NO, the C=C and C=O functional groups and the benzene ring are involved in an extended conjugated system. The mol-ecules are essentially planar with a maximal deviation from planarity for the non-H atoms of 0.062 (2) Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21580083      PMCID: PMC2980110          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809048879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the pharmaceutical activity of enamino­nes, see: Edafiogh et al. (2003 ▶); Eddington et al. (2003 ▶). For the use of enamino­nes as chelating ligands for main group metals and transition metals in coordination chemistry, see: Cindrić et al. (2004 ▶); Shi et al. (2008 ▶). For the chemical synthesis of enamino­nes, see: Kantevari et al. (2007 ▶); Ke et al. (2009 ▶). For the crystal structures of enamino­nes, see: Lemmerer et al. (2007 ▶); Bertolasi et al. (1999 ▶); Blake et al. (1996 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C12H15NO M = 189.25 Monoclinic, a = 8.7918 (17) Å b = 5.9506 (12) Å c = 20.789 (4) Å β = 99.300 (3)° V = 1073.3 (4) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.07 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.08 × 0.06 × 0.03 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004 ▶) T min = 0.994, T max = 0.998 5180 measured reflections 2290 independent reflections 1731 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.023

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.046 wR(F 2) = 0.150 S = 1.02 2290 reflections 130 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.27 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2005 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809048879/vm2013sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809048879/vm2013Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C12H15NOF(000) = 408
Mr = 189.25Dx = 1.171 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMelting point: 367 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.7918 (17) ÅCell parameters from 1291 reflections
b = 5.9506 (12) Åθ = 3.1–28.6°
c = 20.789 (4) ŵ = 0.07 mm1
β = 99.300 (3)°T = 173 K
V = 1073.3 (4) Å3Plate, colourless
Z = 40.08 × 0.06 × 0.03 mm
Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer2290 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1731 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.023
ω and phi scansθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.994, Tmax = 0.998k = −7→7
5180 measured reflectionsl = −11→26
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.150H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0918P)2 + 0.1894P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2290 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
130 parametersΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.19626 (13)0.51500 (19)0.07917 (6)0.0490 (4)
N1−0.15817 (14)0.0530 (2)0.05528 (6)0.0327 (3)
C10.84154 (18)0.1518 (3)0.24118 (8)0.0439 (4)
H1A0.8475−0.00020.25960.066*
H1B0.86260.26190.27650.066*
H1C0.91790.16800.21200.066*
C20.68222 (16)0.1912 (2)0.20336 (7)0.0308 (3)
C30.64246 (17)0.3950 (3)0.17274 (7)0.0346 (4)
H3A0.71790.51010.17440.042*
C40.49477 (17)0.4341 (2)0.13971 (7)0.0318 (3)
H4A0.47050.57530.11930.038*
C50.38156 (16)0.2684 (2)0.13621 (6)0.0271 (3)
C60.42232 (16)0.0632 (2)0.16573 (7)0.0302 (3)
H6A0.3478−0.05350.16320.036*
C70.57032 (17)0.0256 (3)0.19896 (7)0.0328 (4)
H7A0.5952−0.11610.21900.039*
C80.22148 (16)0.3234 (2)0.10167 (7)0.0301 (3)
C90.10551 (16)0.1520 (2)0.09670 (7)0.0291 (3)
H9A0.12990.00870.11570.035*
C10−0.03947 (16)0.1940 (2)0.06473 (7)0.0296 (3)
H10A−0.05780.34080.04720.036*
C11−0.1441 (2)−0.1751 (3)0.07988 (9)0.0442 (4)
H11A−0.0440−0.23680.07390.066*
H11B−0.2268−0.26750.05600.066*
H11C−0.1520−0.17520.12640.066*
C12−0.30880 (17)0.1211 (3)0.02142 (8)0.0411 (4)
H12A−0.30260.27400.00450.062*
H12B−0.38330.11750.05180.062*
H12C−0.34210.0178−0.01480.062*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0387 (7)0.0328 (6)0.0712 (9)−0.0016 (5)−0.0038 (6)0.0170 (6)
N10.0276 (6)0.0359 (7)0.0341 (7)−0.0024 (5)0.0035 (5)−0.0010 (5)
C10.0330 (9)0.0542 (10)0.0421 (9)0.0026 (7)−0.0008 (7)−0.0023 (8)
C20.0276 (7)0.0373 (8)0.0274 (7)0.0008 (6)0.0047 (5)−0.0040 (6)
C30.0325 (8)0.0346 (8)0.0367 (8)−0.0090 (6)0.0056 (6)−0.0041 (6)
C40.0360 (8)0.0261 (7)0.0335 (8)−0.0030 (6)0.0065 (6)0.0026 (6)
C50.0283 (7)0.0286 (7)0.0250 (7)−0.0013 (5)0.0062 (5)−0.0018 (5)
C60.0299 (7)0.0280 (7)0.0326 (8)−0.0030 (6)0.0050 (6)0.0013 (6)
C70.0356 (8)0.0318 (8)0.0309 (7)0.0028 (6)0.0048 (6)0.0031 (6)
C80.0321 (8)0.0280 (7)0.0305 (7)0.0006 (6)0.0056 (6)0.0015 (6)
C90.0286 (8)0.0282 (7)0.0307 (7)0.0004 (6)0.0055 (6)0.0019 (6)
C100.0316 (8)0.0288 (7)0.0296 (7)−0.0003 (6)0.0083 (6)−0.0007 (6)
C110.0457 (10)0.0360 (9)0.0512 (10)−0.0103 (7)0.0090 (8)−0.0011 (7)
C120.0285 (8)0.0562 (11)0.0377 (8)−0.0011 (7)0.0031 (6)−0.0056 (7)
O1—C81.2388 (18)C5—C81.509 (2)
N1—C101.3288 (18)C6—C71.389 (2)
N1—C111.448 (2)C6—H6A0.9500
N1—C121.453 (2)C7—H7A0.9500
C1—C21.510 (2)C8—C91.434 (2)
C1—H1A0.9800C9—C101.362 (2)
C1—H1B0.9800C9—H9A0.9500
C1—H1C0.9800C10—H10A0.9500
C2—C71.385 (2)C11—H11A0.9800
C2—C31.388 (2)C11—H11B0.9800
C3—C41.387 (2)C11—H11C0.9800
C3—H3A0.9500C12—H12A0.9800
C4—C51.395 (2)C12—H12B0.9800
C4—H4A0.9500C12—H12C0.9800
C5—C61.387 (2)
C10—N1—C11121.29 (13)C2—C7—C6121.09 (13)
C10—N1—C12121.85 (13)C2—C7—H7A119.5
C11—N1—C12116.84 (13)C6—C7—H7A119.5
C2—C1—H1A109.5O1—C8—C9123.07 (13)
C2—C1—H1B109.5O1—C8—C5118.41 (13)
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C9—C8—C5118.52 (12)
C2—C1—H1C109.5C10—C9—C8120.19 (13)
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C10—C9—H9A119.9
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C8—C9—H9A119.9
C7—C2—C3117.91 (13)N1—C10—C9127.35 (14)
C7—C2—C1120.88 (14)N1—C10—H10A116.3
C3—C2—C1121.21 (14)C9—C10—H10A116.3
C4—C3—C2121.32 (13)N1—C11—H11A109.5
C4—C3—H3A119.3N1—C11—H11B109.5
C2—C3—H3A119.3H11A—C11—H11B109.5
C3—C4—C5120.69 (14)N1—C11—H11C109.5
C3—C4—H4A119.7H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C4—H4A119.7H11B—C11—H11C109.5
C6—C5—C4117.92 (13)N1—C12—H12A109.5
C6—C5—C8123.77 (13)N1—C12—H12B109.5
C4—C5—C8118.31 (13)H12A—C12—H12B109.5
C5—C6—C7121.06 (13)N1—C12—H12C109.5
C5—C6—H6A119.5H12A—C12—H12C109.5
C7—C6—H6A119.5H12B—C12—H12C109.5
  4 in total

1.  Anticonvulsant evaluation and mechanism of action of benzylamino enaminones.

Authors:  Ivan O Edafiogho; Kethireddy V V Ananthalakshmi; Samuel B Kombian
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Interplay of hydrogen bonding and other molecular interactions in determining the crystal packing of a series of anti-beta-ketoarylhydrazones.

Authors: 
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1999-12-01

4.  Synthesis and anticonvulsant activity of enaminones. Part 7. Synthesis and anticonvulsant evaluation of ethyl 4-[(substituted phenyl)amino]-6-methyl-2-oxocyclohex-3-ene-1-carboxylates and their corresponding 5-methylcyclohex-2-enone derivatives.

Authors:  Natalie D Eddington; Donna S Cox; Manoj Khurana; Noha N Salama; James P Stables; Sylvia J Harrison; Abraham Negussie; Robert S Taylor; Uy Q Tran; Jacqueline A Moore; Judith C Barrow; K R Scott
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.514

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.