Literature DB >> 21580003

Ethane-1,2-diyl bis-(pyridine-3-car-box-ylate).

Iván Brito, Javier Vallejos, Matías López-Rodríguez, Alejandro Cárdenas.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(14)H(12)N(2)O(4), has twofold imposed crystallographic symmetry in the solid state. The asymmetric unit contains one half-mol-ecule. An intra-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen bond is formed between the carboxyl-ate O group and one H atom of the aromatic ring such that a five-membered ring is formed. The angle between the planes of symmetry-related aromatic rings is 44.71 (19)°.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21580003      PMCID: PMC2980043          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809052106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the synthesis of ditopic flexible linkers, see: Chatterjee et al. (2004 ▶). For the potential of coordination polymers based on this multitopic bridging ligand and metal centers as functional materials, see: Huang et al. (2007 ▶). For applications, see: Matsuda et al. (2005 ▶); Wu et al. (2005 ▶); Xiang et al. (2005 ▶). For bond-length data, see: Allen (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C14H12N2O4 M = 272.26 Orthorhombic, a = 4.0740 (14) Å b = 21.3404 (7) Å c = 7.395 (6) Å V = 642.9 (6) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.19 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD area-detector diffractometer 2298 measured reflections 874 independent reflections 694 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.030

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.049 wR(F 2) = 0.131 S = 1.27 874 reflections 91 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3 Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2000 ▶); cell refinement: DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶); data reduction: DENZO-SMN; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809052106/om2303sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809052106/om2303Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C14H12N2O4F(000) = 284
Mr = 272.26Dx = 1.406 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P21212Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2 2abCell parameters from 1704 reflections
a = 4.0740 (14) Åθ = 1.9–27.5°
b = 21.3404 (7) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 7.395 (6) ÅT = 293 K
V = 642.9 (6) Å3Prismatic, colourless
Z = 20.19 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm
Nonius KappaCCD area-detector diffractometer694 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.030
graphiteθmax = 27.6°, θmin = 1.9°
φ scans, and ω scans with κ offsetsh = −5→0
2298 measured reflectionsk = −27→27
874 independent reflectionsl = −9→9
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.131H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.27w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0408P)2 + 0.2469P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
874 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
91 parametersΔρmax = 0.16 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.18 e Å3
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O1−0.1685 (7)0.44509 (9)−0.0673 (3)0.0399 (6)
O2−0.1110 (9)0.34487 (11)−0.1477 (3)0.0619 (9)
N1−0.5385 (10)0.40255 (14)0.4274 (4)0.0574 (10)
C1−0.3638 (9)0.36912 (14)0.1334 (4)0.0330 (8)
C2−0.3991 (10)0.41380 (16)0.2682 (5)0.0458 (10)
H2−0.32070.4540.24580.055*
C3−0.6491 (10)0.34439 (17)0.4541 (5)0.0497 (10)
H3−0.74970.33550.5640.06*
C4−0.6241 (11)0.29697 (17)0.3305 (4)0.0462 (10)
H4−0.70580.25730.35620.055*
C5−0.4756 (10)0.30923 (15)0.1671 (4)0.0416 (9)
H5−0.4510.27780.08120.05*
C6−0.2039 (9)0.38335 (15)−0.0413 (4)0.0365 (8)
C70.0000 (10)0.46502 (15)−0.2299 (4)0.0408 (9)
H7A−0.11240.4492−0.33620.049*
H7B0.22330.4493−0.23060.049*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0527 (15)0.0300 (12)0.0371 (11)−0.0025 (11)0.0110 (13)−0.0014 (10)
O20.102 (2)0.0365 (13)0.0474 (13)0.0018 (16)0.0250 (17)−0.0097 (12)
N10.077 (2)0.051 (2)0.0441 (16)−0.0096 (19)0.015 (2)−0.0089 (15)
C10.038 (2)0.0291 (15)0.0321 (15)0.0021 (15)−0.0016 (16)−0.0008 (12)
C20.058 (3)0.0334 (18)0.0457 (19)−0.0051 (19)0.008 (2)−0.0066 (15)
C30.057 (3)0.054 (2)0.0380 (18)−0.009 (2)0.008 (2)0.0021 (17)
C40.055 (3)0.0358 (18)0.0478 (19)−0.0023 (18)0.003 (2)0.0044 (15)
C50.049 (2)0.0331 (17)0.0423 (17)−0.0009 (18)0.0011 (19)−0.0043 (15)
C60.042 (2)0.0318 (17)0.0360 (16)0.0001 (16)−0.0020 (17)−0.0014 (14)
C70.047 (2)0.0460 (18)0.0294 (15)−0.0102 (19)0.0023 (18)−0.0013 (14)
O1—C61.339 (4)C3—C41.368 (5)
O1—C71.449 (4)C3—H30.93
O2—C61.198 (4)C4—C51.376 (5)
N1—C21.330 (5)C4—H40.93
N1—C31.335 (5)C5—H50.93
C1—C51.380 (4)C7—C7i1.493 (7)
C1—C21.387 (4)C7—H7A0.97
C1—C61.478 (4)C7—H7B0.97
C2—H20.93
C6—O1—C7117.3 (2)C5—C4—H4120.7
C2—N1—C3116.3 (3)C4—C5—C1118.7 (3)
C5—C1—C2118.2 (3)C4—C5—H5120.6
C5—C1—C6119.6 (3)C1—C5—H5120.6
C2—C1—C6122.2 (3)O2—C6—O1123.1 (3)
N1—C2—C1123.8 (3)O2—C6—C1124.9 (3)
N1—C2—H2118.1O1—C6—C1112.0 (3)
C1—C2—H2118.1O1—C7—C7i107.1 (3)
N1—C3—C4124.3 (3)O1—C7—H7A110.3
N1—C3—H3117.8C7i—C7—H7A110.3
C4—C3—H3117.8O1—C7—H7B110.3
C3—C4—C5118.6 (3)C7i—C7—H7B110.3
C3—C4—H4120.7H7A—C7—H7B108.6
C3—N1—C2—C1−0.2 (6)C7—O1—C6—O2−2.0 (5)
C5—C1—C2—N1−0.9 (6)C7—O1—C6—C1177.0 (3)
C6—C1—C2—N1−179.3 (4)C5—C1—C6—O2−13.3 (6)
C2—N1—C3—C40.7 (6)C2—C1—C6—O2165.1 (4)
N1—C3—C4—C50.1 (7)C5—C1—C6—O1167.8 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C1−1.3 (6)C2—C1—C6—O1−13.9 (5)
C2—C1—C5—C41.7 (6)C6—O1—C7—C7i178.5 (4)
C6—C1—C5—C4−179.9 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2···O10.932.402.735 (5)101
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
C2—H2⋯O10.932.402.735 (5)101
  7 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising.

Authors:  Frank H Allen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  Self-assembly of flexible supramolecular metallacyclic ensembles: structures and adsorption properties of their nanoporous crystalline frameworks.

Authors:  Biswaroop Chatterjee; Juan C Noveron; Marino J E Resendiz; Jie Liu; Takuya Yamamoto; Daniel Parker; Martin Cinke; Cattien V Nguyen; Atta M Arif; Peter J Stang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  A homochiral porous metal-organic framework for highly enantioselective heterogeneous asymmetric catalysis.

Authors:  Chuan-De Wu; Aiguo Hu; Lin Zhang; Wenbin Lin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  A 3D canted antiferromagnetic porous metal-organic framework with anatase topology through assembly of an analogue of polyoxometalate.

Authors:  Shengchang Xiang; Xintao Wu; Jianjun Zhang; Ruibiao Fu; Shengmin Hu; Xudong Zhang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Highly controlled acetylene accommodation in a metal-organic microporous material.

Authors:  Ryotaro Matsuda; Ryo Kitaura; Susumu Kitagawa; Yoshiki Kubota; Rodion V Belosludov; Tatsuo C Kobayashi; Hirotoshi Sakamoto; Takashi Chiba; Masaki Takata; Yoshiyuki Kawazoe; Yoshimi Mita
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Butane-1,4-diyl bis-(pyridine-3-carboxyl-ate).

Authors:  Javier Vallejos; Iván Brito; Alejandro Cárdenas; Michael Bolte
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-06-13

2.  Poly[[μ-ethane-1,2-diyl bis-(pyridine-3-carboxyl-ate)](μ-tetra-fluorido-borato)silver(I)].

Authors:  Javier Vallejos; Iván Brito; Alejandro Cárdenas; Michael Bolte
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-04-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.