Literature DB >> 21579900

Chloranilic acid: a redetermination at 100 K.

Grzegorz Dutkiewicz, H S Yathirajan, Q N M Hakim Al-Arique, B Narayana, Maciej Kubicki.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of chloranilic acid, C(6)H(2)Cl(2)O(4), was first described by Andersen in 1967 [Andersen, E. K. (1967). Acta Cryst. 22, 188-191] at room temperature using visually estimated intensities. Taking into account the importance of the title compound, we have redetermined the structure at 100 (1) K. The approximately planar mol-ecule [the maximum deviation from the mean plane through the ring is 0.0014 (9) Å for the ring atoms and 0.029 (3) Å for the other atoms] occupies a special position, lying across the center of symmetry. In the crystal structure, a two-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network sustained by O-H⋯O inter-actions runs approximately parallel to [101]. The two-dimensional layers are further packed in a parallel fashion, stabilized by Cl⋯Cl inter-actions [Cl⋯Cl = 3.2838 (8) Å, C-Cl⋯Cl = 152.96 (6)°].

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21579900      PMCID: PMC2979702          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810003387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For charge-transfer complexes of chloranilic acid, see: Gotoh et al. (2006 ▶, 2007 ▶, 2008 ▶); Gotoh & Ishida (2009 ▶); Ishida (2004 ▶); Ishida & Kashino (1999 ▶). For a recent study of the formation of either salts or co-crystals by chloranilic acid with different organic bases, see: Molčanov & Kojić-Prodić (2010 ▶). For the previous determination of the title structure, see: Andersen (1967a ▶) and of its hydrate, see: Andersen (1967b ▶). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ▶). For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: (Allen, 2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H2Cl2O4 M = 208.98 Monoclinic, a = 7.5338 (12) Å b = 5.5225 (10) Å c = 8.5720 (12) Å β = 104.868 (11)° V = 344.70 (10) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.90 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.3 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Eos diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction (2009 ▶)) T min = 0.857, T max = 1.000 6154 measured reflections 774 independent reflections 698 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.032

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.025 wR(F 2) = 0.056 S = 1.09 774 reflections 59 parameters All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 0.37 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.27 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: Stereochemical Workstation Operation Manual (Siemens, 1989 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810003387/ds2017sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536810003387/ds2017Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H2Cl2O4F(000) = 208
Mr = 208.98Dx = 2.014 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 4539 reflections
a = 7.5338 (12) Åθ = 2.8–27.8°
b = 5.5225 (10) ŵ = 0.90 mm1
c = 8.5720 (12) ÅT = 100 K
β = 104.868 (11)°Prism, red
V = 344.70 (10) Å30.3 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm
Z = 2
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Eos diffractometer774 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source698 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.032
Detector resolution: 16.1544 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.9°, θmin = 3.2°
ω–scanh = −9→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction (2009))k = −7→7
Tmin = 0.857, Tmax = 1.000l = −11→10
6154 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.056All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.09w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0204P)2 + 0.3502P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
774 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
59 parametersΔρmax = 0.37 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.27 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.8496 (2)−0.1699 (3)0.47066 (18)0.0102 (3)
Cl10.66487 (5)−0.36207 (7)0.44138 (4)0.01295 (13)
C20.9798 (2)−0.1990 (3)0.38967 (18)0.0101 (3)
O20.97189 (15)−0.3741 (2)0.28296 (13)0.0132 (3)
H21.064 (3)−0.381 (4)0.249 (3)0.034 (7)*
C31.14042 (19)−0.0274 (3)0.41584 (17)0.0095 (3)
O31.25301 (15)−0.0641 (2)0.33789 (13)0.0126 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0081 (7)0.0100 (8)0.0122 (7)−0.0022 (6)0.0020 (6)0.0014 (6)
Cl10.01094 (19)0.0138 (2)0.0150 (2)−0.00495 (14)0.00488 (13)−0.00150 (14)
C20.0113 (7)0.0081 (7)0.0102 (7)0.0005 (6)0.0016 (6)0.0013 (6)
O20.0121 (5)0.0133 (6)0.0163 (6)−0.0014 (4)0.0075 (5)−0.0045 (4)
C30.0084 (7)0.0103 (7)0.0098 (7)0.0010 (6)0.0021 (6)0.0041 (6)
O30.0121 (5)0.0131 (6)0.0147 (5)0.0003 (4)0.0072 (4)0.0008 (4)
C1—C21.349 (2)C2—C31.508 (2)
C1—C3i1.450 (2)O2—H20.82 (2)
C1—Cl11.7164 (15)C3—O31.2240 (18)
C2—O21.3217 (19)
C2—C1—C3i121.02 (14)C1—C2—C3120.71 (14)
C2—C1—Cl1121.38 (12)C2—O2—H2112.9 (17)
C3i—C1—Cl1117.59 (11)O3—C3—C1i124.53 (14)
O2—C2—C1122.23 (14)O3—C3—C2117.19 (14)
O2—C2—C3117.05 (13)C1i—C3—C2118.27 (13)
C3i—C1—C2—O2−178.48 (14)O2—C2—C3—O3−0.8 (2)
Cl1—C1—C2—O20.7 (2)C1—C2—C3—O3−179.74 (14)
C3i—C1—C2—C30.4 (2)O2—C2—C3—C1i178.55 (13)
Cl1—C1—C2—C3179.51 (11)C1—C2—C3—C1i−0.4 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O3ii0.82 (2)2.00 (2)2.7516 (15)152 (2)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O3i0.82 (2)2.00 (2)2.7516 (15)152 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  5 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising.

Authors:  Frank H Allen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  Hydrogen bonding in two solid phases of phenazine-chloranilic acid (1/1) determined at 170 and 93 K.

Authors:  Kazuma Gotoh; Tetsuo Asaji; Hiroyuki Ishida
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  Hydrogen bonding in 1,2-diazine-chloranilic acid (2/1) and 1,4-diazine-chloranilic acid (2/1) determined at 110 K.

Authors:  Kazuma Gotoh; Tetsuo Asaji; Hiroyuki Ishida
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.172

5.  Pyridine-3-carbonitrile-chloranilic acid-acetonitrile (2/1/2).

Authors:  Kazuma Gotoh; Hiroyuki Ishida
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-09-16
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Triprolidinium dichloranilate-chloranilic acid-methanol-water (2/1/2/2).

Authors:  A S Dayananda; Ray J Butcher; Mehmet Akkurt; H S Yathirajan; B Narayana
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-03-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.