Literature DB >> 21578889

(E)-1-Bromo-4-(2-nitro-prop-1-en-yl)benzene.

Bailin Li1.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(9)H(8)BrNO(2), which was synthesized by the condensation of 4-bromo-benzaldehyde with nitro-ethane, possesses a trans configuration. The dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the mean plane of the double bond is 7.31 (3)°. The crystal structure is stabilized by short inter-molecular Br⋯O contacts [3.168 (4) Å].

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21578889      PMCID: PMC2971981          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809048910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For general background to nitro­alkenes as inter­mediates in the preparation of numerous products including insecticides and pharmacologically active substances, see: Boelle et al. (1998 ▶); Vallejos et al. (2005 ▶). For related structures, see: Boys et al. (1993 ▶); Mugnoli et al. (1991 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C9H8BrNO2 M = 242.07 Triclinic, a = 6.9787 (5) Å b = 7.4123 (5) Å c = 9.7659 (6) Å α = 105.435 (2)° β = 95.087 (2)° γ = 104.323 (2)° V = 465.31 (5) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 4.38 mm−1 T = 296 K 0.21 × 0.19 × 0.08 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.388, T max = 0.703 4605 measured reflections 2112 independent reflections 1303 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.027

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.035 wR(F 2) = 0.094 S = 1.00 2112 reflections 120 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.71 e Å−3 Data collection: PROCESS-AUTO (Rigaku, 2006 ▶); cell refinement: PROCESS-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2007 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809048910/zq2017sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809048910/zq2017Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H8BrNO2Z = 2
Mr = 242.07F(000) = 240
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.728 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.9787 (5) ÅCell parameters from 3184 reflections
b = 7.4123 (5) Åθ = 3.1–27.4°
c = 9.7659 (6) ŵ = 4.38 mm1
α = 105.435 (2)°T = 296 K
β = 95.087 (2)°Platelet, yellow
γ = 104.323 (2)°0.21 × 0.19 × 0.08 mm
V = 465.31 (5) Å3
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer2112 independent reflections
Radiation source: rolling anode1303 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.027
Detector resolution: 10.00 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.4°, θmin = 3.1°
ω scansh = −9→9
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)k = −9→8
Tmin = 0.388, Tmax = 0.703l = −12→12
4605 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.094w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.012P)2 + 0.950P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.00(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2112 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.46 e Å3
120 parametersΔρmin = −0.71 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0149 (13)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.90197 (7)0.24927 (9)0.09032 (5)0.0754 (2)
N10.2076 (6)0.2311 (6)0.7592 (4)0.0660 (10)
O10.2341 (5)0.2609 (6)0.8891 (4)0.0937 (12)
O20.0411 (5)0.1719 (7)0.6875 (4)0.1038 (14)
C80.3870 (6)0.2659 (6)0.6875 (4)0.0514 (9)
C10.7334 (6)0.2408 (6)0.2327 (4)0.0567 (10)
C50.4097 (6)0.1824 (7)0.2989 (4)0.0631 (12)
H50.27120.14560.27200.076*
C70.3513 (6)0.2154 (7)0.5461 (4)0.0594 (11)
H70.21650.16330.50510.071*
C40.4907 (6)0.2283 (6)0.4430 (4)0.0524 (10)
C30.6976 (6)0.2770 (8)0.4767 (5)0.0776 (15)
H30.75690.30550.57200.093*
C90.5777 (7)0.3501 (9)0.7900 (5)0.0825 (16)
H9A0.63490.24760.79870.099*
H9B0.55280.41650.88250.099*
H9C0.66940.44090.75550.099*
C20.8179 (6)0.2840 (8)0.3723 (5)0.0742 (14)
H20.95650.31830.39760.089*
C60.5299 (6)0.1901 (7)0.1943 (4)0.0680 (13)
H60.47270.16090.09850.082*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0560 (3)0.1058 (5)0.0598 (3)0.0136 (2)0.0153 (2)0.0237 (3)
N10.055 (2)0.081 (3)0.055 (2)0.0147 (19)0.0103 (18)0.014 (2)
O10.076 (2)0.142 (4)0.056 (2)0.019 (2)0.0205 (17)0.025 (2)
O20.0467 (19)0.173 (4)0.074 (2)0.017 (2)0.0114 (17)0.020 (2)
C80.045 (2)0.056 (3)0.050 (2)0.0112 (18)0.0092 (17)0.0142 (19)
C10.052 (2)0.066 (3)0.052 (2)0.013 (2)0.0100 (19)0.019 (2)
C50.042 (2)0.087 (3)0.050 (2)0.012 (2)−0.0015 (18)0.012 (2)
C70.043 (2)0.077 (3)0.051 (2)0.015 (2)0.0032 (17)0.012 (2)
C40.042 (2)0.064 (3)0.048 (2)0.0140 (19)0.0039 (16)0.013 (2)
C30.050 (2)0.134 (5)0.044 (2)0.024 (3)−0.0013 (19)0.022 (3)
C90.052 (3)0.122 (5)0.055 (3)0.008 (3)0.003 (2)0.015 (3)
C20.038 (2)0.123 (4)0.055 (3)0.018 (2)0.0015 (19)0.022 (3)
C60.047 (2)0.103 (4)0.045 (2)0.013 (2)0.0013 (18)0.017 (2)
Br1—C11.902 (4)C7—C41.466 (5)
N1—O21.214 (5)C7—H70.9300
N1—O11.217 (4)C4—C31.385 (6)
N1—C81.488 (5)C3—C21.380 (6)
C8—C71.314 (5)C3—H30.9300
C8—C91.478 (6)C9—H9A0.9600
C1—C21.357 (6)C9—H9B0.9600
C1—C61.366 (6)C9—H9C0.9600
C5—C61.381 (6)C2—H20.9300
C5—C41.388 (5)C6—H60.9300
C5—H50.9300
O2—N1—O1122.1 (4)C5—C4—C7117.7 (4)
O2—N1—C8119.7 (4)C2—C3—C4121.6 (4)
O1—N1—C8118.2 (4)C2—C3—H3119.2
C7—C8—C9130.9 (4)C4—C3—H3119.2
C7—C8—N1115.8 (4)C8—C9—H9A109.5
C9—C8—N1113.2 (3)C8—C9—H9B109.5
C2—C1—C6120.5 (4)H9A—C9—H9B109.5
C2—C1—Br1119.2 (3)C8—C9—H9C109.5
C6—C1—Br1120.3 (3)H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C6—C5—C4121.6 (4)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
C6—C5—H5119.2C1—C2—C3119.9 (4)
C4—C5—H5119.2C1—C2—H2120.0
C8—C7—C4130.1 (4)C3—C2—H2120.0
C8—C7—H7115.0C1—C6—C5119.5 (4)
C4—C7—H7115.0C1—C6—H6120.2
C3—C4—C5116.9 (4)C5—C6—H6120.2
C3—C4—C7125.4 (4)
O2—N1—C8—C7−4.8 (6)C8—C7—C4—C5−173.5 (5)
O1—N1—C8—C7174.2 (5)C5—C4—C3—C21.5 (8)
O2—N1—C8—C9176.1 (5)C7—C4—C3—C2179.4 (5)
O1—N1—C8—C9−4.9 (6)C6—C1—C2—C3−0.1 (8)
C9—C8—C7—C4−0.7 (9)Br1—C1—C2—C3−179.5 (4)
N1—C8—C7—C4−179.7 (4)C4—C3—C2—C1−0.6 (8)
C6—C5—C4—C3−1.8 (7)C2—C1—C6—C5−0.2 (8)
C6—C5—C4—C7−179.8 (4)Br1—C1—C6—C5179.2 (4)
C8—C7—C4—C38.7 (8)C4—C5—C6—C11.1 (8)
  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Heteroarylisopropylamines as MAO inhibitors.

Authors:  Gabriel Vallejos; Angélica Fierro; Marcos Caroli Rezende; Silvia Sepúlveda-Boza; Miguel Reyes-Parada
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.641

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.