Literature DB >> 21578763

l-Serine methyl ester hydro-chloride.

Arie Schouten1, Martin Lutz.   

Abstract

In the enanti-opure crystal of the title compound, C(4)H(10)NO(3) (+)·Cl(-), inter-molecular O-H⋯Cl and N-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules into layers parallel to (001).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21578763      PMCID: PMC2971808          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809046480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

Esterification of the carboxyl group of amino acids plays an important role in the synthesis of peptides, especially due to the increased solubility in non-aquous organic solvents, see: Bodanszky (1993 ▶). For related structures, see: Bryndal et al. (2006 ▶); Görbitz (1989 ▶). For the determination of the absolute structure, see: Flack & Bernardinelli (2000 ▶); Flack & Shmueli (2007 ▶); Hooft et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C4H10NO3 +·Cl− M = 155.58 Monoclinic, a = 5.22645 (9) Å b = 6.39388 (14) Å c = 11.6420 (4) Å β = 90.090 (1)° V = 389.04 (2) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.44 mm−1 T = 150 K 0.38 × 0.33 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002 ▶) T min = 0.78, T max = 0.93 15456 measured reflections 3449 independent reflections 3242 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.030

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.022 wR(F 2) = 0.058 S = 1.07 3449 reflections 100 parameters 1 restraint H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 1599 Friedel pairs Flack parameter: 0.00 (3) Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1999 ▶); cell refinement: PEAKREF (Schreurs, 2005 ▶); data reduction: EVAL15 (Xian et al., 2006 ▶) and SADABS (Sheldrick, 2002 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809046480/vm2012sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809046480/vm2012Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C4H10NO3+·ClF(000) = 164
Mr = 155.58Dx = 1.328 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ybCell parameters from 14244 reflections
a = 5.22645 (9) Åθ = 1.8–35.0°
b = 6.39388 (14) ŵ = 0.44 mm1
c = 11.6420 (4) ÅT = 150 K
β = 90.090 (1)°Irregular plate, colourless
V = 389.04 (2) Å30.38 × 0.33 × 0.15 mm
Z = 2
Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer3449 independent reflections
Radiation source: rotating anode3242 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.030
φ and ω scansθmax = 35.0°, θmin = 1.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.78, Tmax = 0.93k = −10→10
15456 measured reflectionsl = −18→18
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.022H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.058w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0329P)2 + 0.0147P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
3449 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.25 e Å3
100 parametersΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
1 restraintAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 1600 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.00 (3)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.19488 (14)0.39944 (12)0.93010 (6)0.03194 (14)
O20.32242 (18)0.69384 (13)0.84254 (7)0.04120 (18)
O30.57878 (12)0.22667 (10)0.72179 (7)0.02923 (13)
H30.644 (3)0.119 (3)0.6913 (14)0.045 (4)*
N10.25944 (14)0.54258 (11)0.63222 (7)0.02279 (12)
H1A0.411 (3)0.597 (3)0.6391 (12)0.037 (4)*
H1B0.254 (3)0.473 (3)0.5725 (15)0.045 (4)*
H1C0.149 (2)0.643 (2)0.6261 (11)0.029 (3)*
C10.24364 (16)0.51767 (14)0.83958 (7)0.02379 (14)
C20.18095 (14)0.40362 (12)0.72813 (7)0.02175 (13)
H2−0.00840.38270.72390.026*
C30.31005 (16)0.19224 (13)0.71800 (8)0.02470 (14)
H3A0.25710.10030.78210.030*
H3B0.26160.12420.64470.030*
C40.2501 (2)0.49492 (19)1.04131 (9)0.0378 (2)
H4A0.43220.53071.04560.057*
H4B0.20790.39611.10280.057*
H4C0.14730.62201.05020.057*
Cl10.77391 (3)0.81723 (3)0.608559 (15)0.02488 (4)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0416 (3)0.0290 (3)0.0252 (3)−0.0042 (3)0.0023 (2)0.0007 (2)
O20.0668 (5)0.0250 (3)0.0317 (3)−0.0129 (4)−0.0020 (3)−0.0044 (3)
O30.0229 (3)0.0219 (3)0.0429 (4)0.0033 (2)−0.0034 (2)−0.0061 (2)
N10.0220 (3)0.0201 (3)0.0263 (3)0.0021 (2)−0.0026 (2)−0.0013 (2)
C10.0236 (3)0.0218 (3)0.0260 (3)0.0014 (3)0.0001 (3)−0.0023 (3)
C20.0187 (3)0.0196 (3)0.0270 (3)−0.0016 (3)−0.0014 (2)−0.0012 (3)
C30.0250 (3)0.0168 (3)0.0323 (4)−0.0016 (3)−0.0027 (3)−0.0025 (3)
C40.0485 (6)0.0403 (5)0.0248 (4)0.0096 (4)0.0003 (4)−0.0030 (4)
Cl10.02321 (7)0.02180 (7)0.02965 (8)0.00378 (7)0.00166 (5)0.00182 (8)
O1—C11.3221 (11)C1—C21.5235 (12)
O1—C41.4598 (13)C2—C31.5153 (12)
O2—C11.1998 (11)C2—H21.0000
O3—C31.4223 (10)C3—H3A0.9900
O3—H30.847 (18)C3—H3B0.9900
N1—C21.4852 (11)C4—H4A0.9800
N1—H1A0.867 (16)C4—H4B0.9800
N1—H1B0.825 (18)C4—H4C0.9800
N1—H1C0.865 (14)
C1—O1—C4115.45 (8)C3—C2—H2108.5
C3—O3—H3104.9 (11)C1—C2—H2108.5
C2—N1—H1A115.1 (10)O3—C3—C2107.42 (6)
C2—N1—H1B107.6 (12)O3—C3—H3A110.2
H1A—N1—H1B108.9 (14)C2—C3—H3A110.2
C2—N1—H1C108.6 (9)O3—C3—H3B110.2
H1A—N1—H1C108.6 (14)C2—C3—H3B110.2
H1B—N1—H1C107.7 (14)H3A—C3—H3B108.5
O2—C1—O1125.48 (9)O1—C4—H4A109.5
O2—C1—C2123.17 (8)O1—C4—H4B109.5
O1—C1—C2111.33 (7)H4A—C4—H4B109.5
N1—C2—C3110.58 (7)O1—C4—H4C109.5
N1—C2—C1107.14 (6)H4A—C4—H4C109.5
C3—C2—C1113.45 (7)H4B—C4—H4C109.5
N1—C2—H2108.5
C4—O1—C1—O2−1.64 (14)O2—C1—C2—C3127.65 (10)
C4—O1—C1—C2179.72 (7)O1—C1—C2—C3−53.67 (9)
O2—C1—C2—N15.33 (11)N1—C2—C3—O359.87 (9)
O1—C1—C2—N1−175.99 (7)C1—C2—C3—O3−60.53 (9)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl10.867 (16)2.390 (16)3.2237 (8)161.2 (14)
N1—H1B···Cl1i0.825 (18)2.336 (18)3.1563 (8)172.7 (16)
N1—H1C···Cl1ii0.865 (14)2.264 (14)3.0979 (7)161.9 (12)
O3—H3···Cl1iii0.847 (18)2.261 (18)3.1041 (7)173.9 (15)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl10.867 (16)2.390 (16)3.2237 (8)161.2 (14)
N1—H1B⋯Cl1i 0.825 (18)2.336 (18)3.1563 (8)172.7 (16)
N1—H1C⋯Cl1ii 0.865 (14)2.264 (14)3.0979 (7)161.9 (12)
O3—H3⋯Cl1iii 0.847 (18)2.261 (18)3.1041 (7)173.9 (15)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  5 in total

1.  The mean-square Friedel intensity difference in P1 with a centrosymmetric substructure.

Authors:  H D Flack; U Shmueli
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Comparison of the methyl ester of L-tyrosine hydrochloride and its methanol monosolvate.

Authors:  Iwona Bryndal; Mariusz Jaremko; Łukasz Jaremko; Tadeusz Lis
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  Determination of absolute structure using Bayesian statistics on Bijvoet differences.

Authors:  Rob W W Hooft; Leo H Straver; Anthony L Spek
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.304

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  l-Alanine methyl ester hydro-chloride monohydrate.

Authors:  Martin Lutz; Arie Schouten
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-02-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.