Literature DB >> 21578483

N-(5-Amino-1H-tetra-zol-1-yl)formamide.

Chun-Lin He1, Zhi-Ming Du, Zheng-Qiang Tang, Xiao-Min Cong, Ling-Qiao Meng.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(2)H(4)N(6)O, the planar [maximum deviation = 0.006 (2) Å] amino-tetra-zole group makes a dihedral angle of 83.65 (8)° with the formamide unit. In the crystal structure, inter-molecular N-H⋯N, N-H⋯O and C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds are responsible for the formation of a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21578483      PMCID: PMC2971177          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809044833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For energetic nitro­gen-rich derivatives of 1,5-diamino­tetra­zole, see: Joo et al. (2008 ▶). For nitro­gen-rich metastable green chemistry compounds, see: Steinhauser et al. (2008 ▶). For 1,5-diamino-1H-tetra­zole derivatives, see: Galvez-Ruiz et al. (2005 ▶). For the structure of N-(1-diacetyl­amino-1H-tetra­zol-5-yl)-acetamide, see: He et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C2H4N6O M = 128.11 Orthorhombic, a = 10.232 (10) Å b = 12.054 (12) Å c = 4.208 (4) Å V = 519.1 (9) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.14 mm−1 T = 93 K 0.47 × 0.27 × 0.07 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Saturn724+ diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.940, T max = 0.991 3464 measured reflections 659 independent reflections 545 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.051

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.036 wR(F 2) = 0.089 S = 1.00 659 reflections 94 parameters 1 restraint H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement Δρmax = 0.22 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2008 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809044833/si2213sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809044833/si2213Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C2H4N6OF(000) = 264
Mr = 128.11Dx = 1.639 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Pnn2Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2 -2nCell parameters from 1548 reflections
a = 10.232 (10) Åθ = 3.4–27.2°
b = 12.054 (12) ŵ = 0.14 mm1
c = 4.208 (4) ÅT = 93 K
V = 519.1 (9) Å3Platelet, colorless
Z = 40.47 × 0.27 × 0.07 mm
Rigaku Saturn724+ diffractometer659 independent reflections
Radiation source: Rotating Anode545 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.051
Detector resolution: 28.5714 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.3°, θmin = 3.4°
multi–scanh = −13→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)k = −15→14
Tmin = 0.940, Tmax = 0.991l = −5→5
3464 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.089H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.00w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0522P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
659 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
94 parametersΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.32520 (17)0.52017 (15)0.4700 (5)0.0250 (5)
N10.53348 (19)0.80213 (18)0.7377 (6)0.0200 (5)
N20.4393 (2)0.85281 (17)0.5557 (6)0.0219 (5)
N30.3276 (2)0.80311 (18)0.5797 (6)0.0213 (5)
N40.34795 (18)0.71697 (17)0.7884 (6)0.0177 (5)
N50.2526 (2)0.6400 (2)0.8533 (6)0.0189 (5)
N60.5250 (2)0.64294 (19)1.0818 (6)0.0210 (5)
C10.4751 (2)0.7167 (2)0.8815 (6)0.0178 (6)
C20.2470 (2)0.5459 (2)0.6773 (7)0.0203 (6)
H20.17690.49610.71800.024*
H5N0.196 (3)0.661 (2)0.986 (9)0.028 (8)*
H6A0.607 (3)0.645 (2)1.134 (8)0.043 (10)*
H6B0.473 (3)0.596 (2)1.192 (8)0.028 (9)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0209 (11)0.0284 (10)0.0259 (11)−0.0004 (8)0.0050 (9)−0.0016 (9)
N10.0113 (10)0.0261 (12)0.0226 (13)0.0013 (8)0.0011 (10)0.0021 (11)
N20.0133 (10)0.0263 (12)0.0262 (14)0.0021 (9)0.0010 (11)0.0016 (11)
N30.0137 (11)0.0257 (11)0.0247 (13)0.0006 (8)0.0006 (10)0.0051 (11)
N40.0093 (10)0.0220 (11)0.0216 (12)−0.0009 (8)0.0009 (10)0.0012 (10)
N50.0090 (10)0.0269 (12)0.0209 (13)−0.0011 (8)0.0050 (9)0.0021 (10)
N60.0116 (10)0.0265 (12)0.0250 (14)−0.0001 (9)−0.0023 (10)0.0025 (11)
C10.0107 (11)0.0229 (13)0.0198 (15)0.0027 (9)0.0004 (11)−0.0028 (11)
C20.0143 (12)0.0233 (15)0.0232 (13)−0.0014 (10)−0.0013 (11)0.0058 (13)
O1—C21.224 (3)N5—C21.356 (4)
N1—C11.335 (3)N5—H5N0.84 (4)
N1—N21.374 (3)N6—C11.328 (4)
N2—N31.294 (3)N6—H6A0.87 (4)
N3—N41.376 (3)N6—H6B0.90 (3)
N4—C11.359 (3)C2—H20.9500
N4—N51.374 (3)
C1—N1—N2106.4 (2)C1—N6—H6A121 (2)
N3—N2—N1111.7 (2)C1—N6—H6B121 (2)
N2—N3—N4105.4 (2)H6A—N6—H6B117 (3)
C1—N4—N5128.4 (2)N6—C1—N1129.2 (2)
C1—N4—N3109.3 (2)N6—C1—N4123.6 (2)
N5—N4—N3122.0 (2)N1—C1—N4107.2 (2)
C2—N5—N4119.1 (2)O1—C2—N5125.0 (2)
C2—N5—H5N126.0 (19)O1—C2—H2117.5
N4—N5—H5N114.4 (19)N5—C2—H2117.5
C1—N1—N2—N3−0.2 (3)N2—N1—C1—N4−0.4 (3)
N1—N2—N3—N40.7 (3)N5—N4—C1—N6−6.3 (4)
N2—N3—N4—C1−1.0 (3)N3—N4—C1—N6−179.7 (2)
N2—N3—N4—N5−174.8 (2)N5—N4—C1—N1174.2 (3)
C1—N4—N5—C2−81.1 (3)N3—N4—C1—N10.9 (3)
N3—N4—N5—C291.4 (3)N4—N5—C2—O13.8 (4)
N2—N1—C1—N6−179.9 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5N···N1i0.84 (3)2.02 (3)2.851 (4)168 (3)
N6—H6A···O1ii0.87 (3)2.54 (3)2.981 (4)113 (2)
N6—H6A···N3iii0.87 (3)2.35 (3)3.164 (4)156 (3)
N6—H6B···O1iv0.91 (3)2.12 (3)3.006 (4)167 (2)
C2—H2···N2v0.952.533.404 (5)152
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N5—H5N⋯N1i0.84 (3)2.02 (3)2.851 (4)168 (3)
N6—H6A⋯O1ii0.87 (3)2.54 (3)2.981 (4)113 (2)
N6—H6A⋯N3iii0.87 (3)2.35 (3)3.164 (4)156 (3)
N6—H6B⋯O1iv0.91 (3)2.12 (3)3.006 (4)167 (2)
C2—H2⋯N2v0.952.533.404 (5)152

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

  5 in total

1.  "Green" pyrotechnics: a chemists' challenge.

Authors:  Georg Steinhauser; Thomas M Klapötke
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Energetic nitrogen-rich derivatives of 1,5-diaminotetrazole.

Authors:  Young-Hyuk Joo; Brendan Twamley; Sonali Garg; Jean'ne M Shreeve
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Derivatives of 1,5-diamino-1H-tetrazole: a new family of energetic heterocyclic-based salts.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Gálvez-Ruiz; Gerhard Holl; Konstantin Karaghiosoff; Thomas M Klapötke; Karolin Löhnwitz; Peter Mayer; Heinrich Nöth; Kurt Polborn; Christoph J Rohbogner; Max Suter; Jan J Weigand
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  N-(1-Diacetyl-amino-1H-tetra-zol-5-yl)acetamide.

Authors:  Chun-Lin He; Zhi-Ming Du; Zheng-Qiang Tang; Xiao-Min Cong; Ling-Qiao Meng
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-07-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.