Literature DB >> 21577897

3-(3,5-Dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)propanamide.

Jian-Feng Zhang1, Feng Huang, Shu-Jiao Chen.   

Abstract

In the crystal of the title compound, C(8)H(13)N(3)O, mol-ecules are linked by inter-molecular N-H⋯N and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds into a three-dimensional network. Additional stabilization is provided by weak inter-molecular C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577897      PMCID: PMC2970388          DOI: 10.1107/S160053680903342X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the potential applications of hemilabile ligands containing substituted pyrazole groups, see: Pal et al. (2005 ▶); Shaw et al. (2004 ▶). For the design of various pyrazole ligands with special structural properties to fulfill the specific stereochemical requirement of a particular metal-binding site, see: Mukherjee (2000 ▶); Paul et al. (2004 ▶);

Experimental

Crystal data

C8H13N3O M = 167.21 Orthorhombic, a = 14.452 (5) Å b = 33.390 (7) Å c = 7.4354 (15) Å V = 3588.0 (16) Å3 Z = 16 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.47 × 0.37 × 0.36 mm

Data collection

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 ▶) T min = 0.963, T max = 0.970 4623 measured reflections 1067 independent reflections 890 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.044

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.033 wR(F 2) = 0.093 S = 1.14 1067 reflections 112 parameters 1 restraint H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.14 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3 Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ▶); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO; data reduction: CrystalStructure (Rigaku/MSC, 2004 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97. Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680903342X/lh2847sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053680903342X/lh2847Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H13N3OF(000) = 1440
Mr = 167.21Dx = 1.238 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, Fdd2Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: F 2 -2dCell parameters from 4623 reflections
a = 14.452 (5) Åθ = 3.1–27.5°
b = 33.390 (7) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 7.4354 (15) ÅT = 298 K
V = 3588.0 (16) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 160.47 × 0.37 × 0.36 mm
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer1067 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube890 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.044
Detector resolution: 0 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.1°
ω scansh = −17→18
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)k = −43→43
Tmin = 0.963, Tmax = 0.970l = −9→8
4623 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.093w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0446P)2 + 1.8694P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.14(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1067 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.14 e Å3
112 parametersΔρmin = −0.19 e Å3
1 restraintExtinction correction: SHELXTL'(Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0108 (8)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.02008 (12)0.12376 (4)0.3335 (3)0.0530 (5)
N1−0.08464 (14)0.07777 (6)0.2532 (4)0.0530 (6)
H1A−0.11850.09520.19910.064*
H1B−0.10130.05300.25560.064*
N20.15555 (13)0.04420 (5)0.1786 (2)0.0364 (5)
N30.12698 (13)0.00771 (5)0.1195 (3)0.0413 (5)
C1−0.00707 (15)0.08880 (6)0.3326 (3)0.0380 (5)
C20.04624 (16)0.05620 (6)0.4265 (3)0.0435 (6)
H2A0.01630.03070.40320.052*
H2B0.04410.06090.55510.052*
C30.14666 (15)0.05349 (7)0.3680 (3)0.0391 (5)
H3B0.17710.07880.39240.047*
H3A0.17750.03290.43790.047*
C40.2226 (2)0.10885 (7)0.0702 (5)0.0622 (8)
H4B0.27460.10820.15040.093*
H4C0.17470.12530.12100.093*
H4A0.24140.1198−0.04340.093*
C50.18687 (15)0.06742 (6)0.0435 (3)0.0422 (5)
C60.17798 (19)0.04516 (8)−0.1109 (4)0.0505 (6)
H6A0.19380.0529−0.22700.061*
C70.14038 (16)0.00856 (7)−0.0582 (3)0.0438 (6)
C80.1147 (2)−0.02660 (9)−0.1705 (5)0.0628 (8)
H8A0.1465−0.0499−0.12740.094*
H8B0.1319−0.0217−0.29320.094*
H8C0.0491−0.0309−0.16340.094*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0548 (10)0.0323 (7)0.0719 (13)−0.0018 (6)−0.0196 (10)−0.0002 (8)
N10.0488 (10)0.0381 (9)0.0720 (16)−0.0038 (8)−0.0163 (12)0.0039 (11)
N20.0386 (10)0.0338 (10)0.0369 (10)0.0008 (7)−0.0009 (9)−0.0020 (8)
N30.0410 (10)0.0342 (9)0.0486 (12)0.0007 (7)−0.0011 (10)−0.0057 (8)
C10.0391 (11)0.0335 (9)0.0415 (12)0.0025 (8)0.0025 (10)−0.0037 (9)
C20.0473 (13)0.0385 (11)0.0447 (13)0.0024 (9)0.0045 (11)0.0049 (10)
C30.0419 (12)0.0367 (10)0.0387 (12)0.0061 (9)−0.0027 (11)−0.0005 (9)
C40.0787 (19)0.0442 (13)0.0636 (18)−0.0134 (12)0.0057 (17)0.0057 (13)
C50.0425 (11)0.0419 (10)0.0422 (13)−0.0005 (9)0.0004 (12)0.0018 (10)
C60.0521 (14)0.0604 (16)0.0390 (12)−0.0001 (11)0.0008 (12)0.0009 (11)
C70.0365 (11)0.0509 (14)0.0441 (13)0.0051 (9)−0.0047 (11)−0.0113 (11)
C80.0568 (15)0.0671 (16)0.0645 (19)0.0018 (12)−0.0065 (15)−0.0243 (15)
O1—C11.232 (2)C3—H3A0.9700
N1—C11.320 (3)C4—C51.490 (3)
N1—H1A0.8598C4—H4B0.9600
N1—H1B0.8603C4—H4C0.9600
N2—C51.347 (3)C4—H4A0.9600
N2—N31.359 (3)C5—C61.373 (4)
N2—C31.448 (3)C6—C71.394 (4)
N3—C71.335 (3)C6—H6A0.9300
C1—C21.505 (3)C7—C81.488 (4)
C2—C31.518 (3)C8—H8A0.9600
C2—H2A0.9700C8—H8B0.9600
C2—H2B0.9700C8—H8C0.9600
C3—H3B0.9700
C1—N1—H1A120.2C5—C4—H4B109.5
C1—N1—H1B119.8C5—C4—H4C109.5
H1A—N1—H1B120.0H4B—C4—H4C109.5
C5—N2—N3112.13 (18)C5—C4—H4A109.5
C5—N2—C3129.18 (18)H4B—C4—H4A109.5
N3—N2—C3118.66 (18)H4C—C4—H4A109.5
C7—N3—N2104.88 (19)N2—C5—C6106.28 (19)
O1—C1—N1122.5 (2)N2—C5—C4123.4 (2)
O1—C1—C2121.3 (2)C6—C5—C4130.3 (2)
N1—C1—C2116.14 (18)C5—C6—C7106.0 (2)
C1—C2—C3113.56 (19)C5—C6—H6A127.0
C1—C2—H2A108.9C7—C6—H6A127.0
C3—C2—H2A108.9N3—C7—C6110.7 (2)
C1—C2—H2B108.9N3—C7—C8120.2 (2)
C3—C2—H2B108.9C6—C7—C8129.1 (3)
H2A—C2—H2B107.7C7—C8—H8A109.5
N2—C3—C2112.11 (19)C7—C8—H8B109.5
N2—C3—H3B109.2H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C2—C3—H3B109.2C7—C8—H8C109.5
N2—C3—H3A109.2H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C2—C3—H3A109.2H8B—C8—H8C109.5
H3B—C3—H3A107.9
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i0.862.102.936 (3)164
N1—H1B···N3ii0.862.303.084 (3)152
C3—H3B···O1iii0.972.523.413 (3)154
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i0.862.102.936 (3)164
N1—H1B⋯N3ii0.862.303.084 (3)152
C3—H3B⋯O1iii0.972.523.413 (3)154

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Copper(II) mediated anion dependent formation of Schiff base complexes.

Authors:  Sachindranath Pal; Anil Kumar Barik; Samik Gupta; Arijit Hazra; Susanta Kumar Kar; Shie-Ming Peng; Gene-Hsiang Lee; Ray J Butcher; M Salah El Fallah; Joan Ribas
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Synthesis and spectroscopy of a series of substituted N-confused tetraphenylporphyrins.

Authors:  Janet L Shaw; Shana A Garrison; Elvin A Alemán; Christopher J Ziegler; David A Modarelli
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 4.354

4.  Structures and anion-binding properties of M4L6 tetrahedral cage complexes with large central cavities.

Authors:  Rowena L Paul; Stephen P Argent; John C Jeffery; Lindsay P Harding; Jason M Lynam; Michael D Ward
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 4.390

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  3-(5-Methyl-3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)propanamide monohydrate.

Authors:  Shu-Jiao Chen; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-12-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.