Literature DB >> 21577876

(2S,3R,4R,5R)-3,4-Dihydr-oxy-5-(hydroxy-meth-yl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid [(2S,3R,4R,5R)-3,4-dihydr-oxy-5-(hydroxy-meth-yl)proline].

Daniel Best, Sarah F Jenkinson, Amber L Thompson, David J Watkin, Francis X Wilson, Robert J Nash, George W J Fleet.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of the title compound, C(6)H(11)NO(5), establishes the relative configuration at the four stereogenic centres; the absolute configuration is determined by the use of d-glucuronolactone as the starting material for the synthesis. Mol-ecules are linked by inter-molecular O-H⋯O and N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds into a three-dimensional network, with each mol-ecule acting as a donor and acceptor for five hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577876      PMCID: PMC2970405          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809035636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For related literature on imino­sugars, see: Asano et al. (2000 ▶); Watson et al. (2001 ▶). For related literature on pipecolic acids, see: Fleet et al. (1987 ▶); Booth et al. (2007 ▶); Bashyal, Chow, Fellows & Fleet (1987 ▶); Manning et al. (1985 ▶); di Bello et al. (1984 ▶); Yoshimura et al. (2008 ▶). For related literature on bulgecinine, see: Toumi et al. (2008 ▶); Bashyal et al. (1986 ▶); Bashyal, Chow & Fleet (1987 ▶); Shinagawa et al. (1984 ▶, 1985 ▶). For related literature on alexines, see: Pereira et al. (1991 ▶); Donohoe et al. (2008 ▶); Kato et al. (2003 ▶); Wormald et al. (1998 ▶). For absolute configuration, see: Flack (1983 ▶); Flack & Bernardinelli (2000 ▶); Flack & Shmueli (2007 ▶); Hooft et al. (2008 ▶); Thompson et al. (2008 ▶); Watkin (1994 ▶). For the weighting scheme, see: Prince (1982 ▶); Thompson & Watkin (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H11NO5 M = 177.16 Triclinic, a = 5.4160 (2) Å b = 5.8236 (3) Å c = 6.6006 (3) Å α = 102.836 (2)° β = 104.776 (2)° γ = 102.8244 (19)° V = 187.50 (2) Å3 Z = 1 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.14 mm−1 T = 150 K 0.25 × 0.17 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Area diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (DENZO/SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶) T min = 0.94, T max = 0.99 2314 measured reflections 834 independent reflections 814 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.025

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.027 wR(F 2) = 0.066 S = 1.00 834 reflections 109 parameters 3 restraints H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.24 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3 Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2001 ▶); cell refinement: DENZO/SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶); data reduction: DENZO/SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003 ▶); molecular graphics: CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: CRYSTALS. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809035636/lh2896sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809035636/lh2896Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H11NO5Z = 1
Mr = 177.16F(000) = 94
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.569 Mg m3
Hall symbol: P 1Melting point: not measured K
a = 5.4160 (2) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 5.8236 (3) ÅCell parameters from 696 reflections
c = 6.6006 (3) Åθ = 5–27°
α = 102.836 (2)°µ = 0.14 mm1
β = 104.776 (2)°T = 150 K
γ = 102.8244 (19)°Plate, clear_pale_colourless
V = 187.50 (2) Å30.25 × 0.17 × 0.06 mm
Area diffractometer814 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.025
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 5.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (DENZO/SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.94, Tmax = 0.99k = −6→7
2314 measured reflectionsl = −8→7
834 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.066 Method, part 1, Chebychev polynomial, (Watkin, 1994, Prince, 1982) [weight] = 1.0/[A0*T0(x) + A1*T1(x) ··· + An-1]*Tn-1(x)] where Ai are the Chebychev coefficients listed below and x = F /Fmax Method = Robust Weighting (Prince, 1982) W = [weight] * [1-(deltaF/6*sigmaF)2]2 Ai are: 22.5 35.8 21.7 10.1 2.91
S = 1.00(Δ/σ)max = 0.0001
834 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.24 e Å3
109 parametersΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
3 restraints
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.1323 (3)0.4021 (3)0.0397 (3)0.0170
C20.3330 (4)0.5769 (4)0.1694 (3)0.0124
O30.3285 (3)0.7782 (3)0.2816 (3)0.0161
C40.6067 (4)0.5299 (3)0.1892 (3)0.0118
N50.8297 (3)0.7483 (3)0.3462 (3)0.0120
C60.8425 (4)0.7309 (4)0.5744 (3)0.0130
C71.1277 (4)0.8313 (4)0.7284 (3)0.0167
O81.2417 (3)1.0809 (3)0.7415 (3)0.0209
C90.7092 (4)0.4584 (4)0.5443 (3)0.0150
C100.6269 (4)0.3243 (4)0.2968 (3)0.0135
O110.8192 (3)0.2063 (3)0.2544 (3)0.0229
O120.4844 (4)0.4511 (3)0.6175 (3)0.0252
H410.63650.49600.04770.0144*
H610.73330.82620.62780.0169*
H721.12840.82030.87470.0191*
H711.23430.73540.67700.0194*
H910.83600.39040.62570.0183*
H1010.45660.20130.25490.0154*
H811.20481.17440.83680.0313*
H510.79540.88690.33320.0177*
H520.98170.74430.32040.0178*
H1110.89930.27340.18390.0347*
H1210.42060.31120.62240.0383*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0115 (7)0.0187 (7)0.0178 (7)0.0024 (5)0.0034 (5)0.0030 (6)
C20.0128 (9)0.0137 (9)0.0134 (9)0.0052 (7)0.0051 (7)0.0074 (7)
O30.0153 (7)0.0148 (7)0.0210 (7)0.0075 (6)0.0074 (5)0.0057 (6)
C40.0113 (9)0.0115 (8)0.0130 (9)0.0032 (7)0.0050 (7)0.0032 (7)
N50.0123 (8)0.0098 (7)0.0150 (8)0.0039 (6)0.0052 (6)0.0042 (6)
C60.0142 (9)0.0115 (8)0.0136 (9)0.0030 (7)0.0053 (7)0.0041 (7)
C70.0154 (9)0.0161 (9)0.0152 (9)0.0013 (8)0.0023 (7)0.0042 (8)
O80.0246 (8)0.0151 (8)0.0190 (7)−0.0019 (6)0.0100 (6)0.0020 (6)
C90.0173 (10)0.0130 (9)0.0165 (10)0.0042 (7)0.0066 (8)0.0067 (7)
C100.0121 (9)0.0124 (9)0.0176 (9)0.0049 (7)0.0058 (7)0.0050 (7)
O110.0280 (8)0.0223 (8)0.0356 (9)0.0180 (7)0.0218 (7)0.0179 (7)
O120.0325 (9)0.0164 (7)0.0304 (9)0.0018 (7)0.0222 (8)0.0056 (7)
O1—C21.264 (3)C7—O81.421 (2)
C2—O31.249 (2)C7—H720.981
C2—C41.545 (2)C7—H710.959
C4—N51.498 (2)O8—H810.832
C4—C101.532 (3)C9—C101.545 (3)
C4—H410.972C9—O121.415 (2)
N5—C61.517 (2)C9—H910.972
N5—H510.885C10—O111.420 (2)
N5—H520.886C10—H1010.963
C6—C71.515 (3)O11—H1110.816
C6—C91.535 (3)O12—H1210.823
C6—H610.973
O1—C2—O3126.24 (18)C6—C7—O8111.22 (16)
O1—C2—C4115.43 (17)C6—C7—H72108.8
O3—C2—C4118.32 (17)O8—C7—H72109.4
C2—C4—N5110.92 (15)C6—C7—H71109.8
C2—C4—C10109.46 (14)O8—C7—H71108.5
N5—C4—C10103.55 (15)H72—C7—H71109.1
C2—C4—H41111.2C7—O8—H81110.0
N5—C4—H41108.5C6—C9—C10106.41 (15)
C10—C4—H41113.0C6—C9—O12106.33 (16)
C4—N5—C6106.33 (14)C10—C9—O12111.81 (16)
C4—N5—H51110.5C6—C9—H91110.0
C6—N5—H51109.1C10—C9—H91109.3
C4—N5—H52109.8O12—C9—H91112.7
C6—N5—H52111.2C9—C10—C4103.65 (15)
H51—N5—H52109.8C9—C10—O11109.89 (16)
N5—C6—C7110.92 (15)C4—C10—O11113.98 (15)
N5—C6—C9105.61 (15)C9—C10—H101108.3
C7—C6—C9114.30 (16)C4—C10—H101111.8
N5—C6—H61108.0O11—C10—H101109.0
C7—C6—H61109.9C10—O11—H111110.0
C9—C6—H61107.9C9—O12—H121109.5
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H71···O12i0.962.393.328 (3)166
C10—H101···O3ii0.962.473.199 (3)133
O8—H81···O1iii0.831.852.679 (3)175
N5—H51···O11iv0.882.032.873 (3)160
N5—H52···O3i0.891.932.814 (3)173
O11—H111···O1i0.821.892.696 (3)170
O12—H121···O8v0.821.912.668 (3)154
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O8—H81⋯O1i0.831.852.679 (3)175
N5—H51⋯O11ii0.882.032.873 (3)160
N5—H52⋯O3iii0.891.932.814 (3)173
O11—H111⋯O1iii0.821.892.696 (3)170
O12—H121⋯O8iv0.821.912.668 (3)154

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  8 in total

Review 1.  Polyhydroxylated alkaloids -- natural occurrence and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  A A Watson; G W Fleet; N Asano; R J Molyneux; R J Nash
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.072

2.  The mean-square Friedel intensity difference in P1 with a centrosymmetric substructure.

Authors:  H D Flack; U Shmueli
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  The absolute configuration of 1-epialexine hemihydrate.

Authors:  Amber L Thompson; David J Watkin; Zoltan A Gal; Laurence Jones; Jackie Hollinshead; Sarah F Jenkinson; George W J Fleet; Robert J Nash
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  Synthesis of both enantiomers of hydroxypipecolic acid derivatives equivalent to 5-azapyranuronic acids and evaluation of their inhibitory activities against glycosidases.

Authors:  Yuichi Yoshimura; Chiaki Ohara; Tatsushi Imahori; Yukako Saito; Atsushi Kato; Saori Miyauchi; Isao Adachi; Hiroki Takahata
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Specific inhibition of human beta-D-glucuronidase and alpha-L-iduronidase by a trihydroxy pipecolic acid of plant origin.

Authors:  I Cenci di Bello; P Dorling; L Fellows; B Winchester
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1984-10-15       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Synthesis of (+)-DGDP and (-)-7-epialexine.

Authors:  Timothy J Donohoe; Matthew D Cheeseman; Timothy J C O'Riordan; Jessica A Kershaw
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Isolation and characterization of bulgecins, new bacterial metabolites with bulge-inducing activity.

Authors:  S Shinagawa; M Maki; K Kintaka; A Imada; M Asai
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Determination of absolute structure using Bayesian statistics on Bijvoet differences.

Authors:  Rob W W Hooft; Leo H Straver; Anthony L Spek
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.304

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.