Literature DB >> 21577859

3-Cyano-anilinium bromide.

Bo Wang1.   

Abstract

In the cation of the title compound, C(7)H(7)N(2) (+)·Br(-), all non-H atoms are essentially coplanar [r.m.s. deviation = 0.010 (5) Å]. The compound is isomorphous with the chloride analogue. In the crystal, the cations and anions are connected by N-H⋯Br hydrogen bonds.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577859      PMCID: PMC2970234          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809034941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For applications of metal-organic coordination compounds, see: Fu et al. (2007 ▶); Chen et al. (2001 ▶); Fu & Xiong (2008 ▶); Xiong et al. (1999 ▶); Xie et al. (2003 ▶); Zhao et al. (2004 ▶). For nitrile derivatives, see: Fu et al. (2008 ▶); Wang et al. 2002 ▶. For the chloride analogue, see: Wen (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H7N2 +·Br M = 199.06 Triclinic, a = 4.6396 (9) Å b = 6.1757 (12) Å c = 13.542 (3) Å α = 93.07 (3)° β = 96.22 (3)° γ = 97.33 (3)° V = 381.68 (13) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 5.31 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.40 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.90, T max = 1.00 3777 measured reflections 1716 independent reflections 1378 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.063

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.052 wR(F 2) = 0.134 S = 1.10 1716 reflections 92 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.71 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.75 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809034941/bx2236sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809034941/bx2236Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H7N2+·BrZ = 2
Mr = 199.06F(000) = 196
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.732 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.6396 (9) ÅCell parameters from 1378 reflections
b = 6.1757 (12) Åθ = 3.0–27.5°
c = 13.542 (3) ŵ = 5.31 mm1
α = 93.07 (3)°T = 298 K
β = 96.22 (3)°Block, colourless
γ = 97.33 (3)°0.40 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
V = 381.68 (13) Å3
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer1716 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1378 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.063
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0°
CCD profile fitting scansh = −6→5
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −8→8
Tmin = 0.90, Tmax = 1.00l = −17→17
3777 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.134H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.053P)2 + 0.0394P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1716 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
92 parametersΔρmax = 0.71 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.75 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N20.6256 (9)0.2461 (6)0.6051 (3)0.0419 (10)
H2A0.74370.14460.59900.063*
H2B0.71750.37550.59270.063*
H2C0.46530.21180.56190.063*
N1−0.0113 (11)0.7158 (8)0.8871 (4)0.0575 (13)
C40.5438 (10)0.2565 (7)0.7064 (4)0.0339 (10)
C30.3783 (10)0.4177 (7)0.7330 (3)0.0349 (10)
H30.32150.51660.68770.042*
C20.3001 (10)0.4273 (7)0.8286 (4)0.0350 (10)
C50.6331 (11)0.1113 (7)0.7719 (4)0.0389 (11)
H50.74460.00480.75270.047*
C70.3878 (12)0.2814 (8)0.8962 (4)0.0429 (12)
H70.33450.28890.96040.051*
C60.5540 (12)0.1259 (8)0.8677 (4)0.0473 (13)
H60.61460.02870.91320.057*
C10.1216 (11)0.5910 (8)0.8593 (4)0.0422 (12)
Br10.09268 (11)0.23870 (7)0.42210 (4)0.0448 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N20.053 (3)0.044 (2)0.032 (2)0.0176 (19)0.0038 (19)0.0003 (18)
N10.058 (3)0.052 (3)0.067 (3)0.020 (2)0.016 (3)−0.004 (2)
C40.040 (3)0.028 (2)0.033 (3)0.0073 (18)0.004 (2)−0.0017 (18)
C30.039 (3)0.033 (2)0.032 (3)0.010 (2)0.000 (2)0.0010 (19)
C20.030 (2)0.034 (2)0.041 (3)0.0057 (18)0.005 (2)−0.002 (2)
C50.049 (3)0.034 (2)0.037 (3)0.018 (2)0.007 (2)−0.001 (2)
C70.056 (3)0.039 (3)0.035 (3)0.011 (2)0.010 (2)0.000 (2)
C60.062 (4)0.040 (3)0.045 (3)0.015 (2)0.010 (3)0.014 (2)
C10.045 (3)0.040 (3)0.044 (3)0.012 (2)0.011 (2)0.000 (2)
Br10.0573 (4)0.0399 (3)0.0423 (4)0.0214 (2)0.0112 (3)0.0037 (2)
N2—C41.463 (6)C3—H30.9300
N2—H2A0.8900C2—C71.384 (7)
N2—H2B0.8900C2—C11.457 (6)
N2—H2C0.8900C5—C61.388 (7)
N1—C11.121 (6)C5—H50.9300
C4—C51.365 (6)C7—C61.371 (7)
C4—C31.388 (6)C7—H70.9300
C3—C21.383 (7)C6—H60.9300
C4—N2—H2A109.5C3—C2—C1120.2 (4)
C4—N2—H2B109.5C7—C2—C1119.1 (5)
H2A—N2—H2B109.5C4—C5—C6118.6 (4)
C4—N2—H2C109.5C4—C5—H5120.7
H2A—N2—H2C109.5C6—C5—H5120.7
H2B—N2—H2C109.5C6—C7—C2119.4 (5)
C5—C4—C3122.0 (4)C6—C7—H7120.3
C5—C4—N2119.8 (4)C2—C7—H7120.3
C3—C4—N2118.2 (4)C7—C6—C5121.0 (5)
C2—C3—C4118.2 (4)C7—C6—H6119.5
C2—C3—H3120.9C5—C6—H6119.5
C4—C3—H3120.9N1—C1—C2177.0 (6)
C3—C2—C7120.7 (4)
C5—C4—C3—C2−0.9 (7)N2—C4—C5—C6179.6 (5)
N2—C4—C3—C2179.8 (4)C3—C2—C7—C60.0 (7)
C4—C3—C2—C70.7 (7)C1—C2—C7—C6179.5 (5)
C4—C3—C2—C1−178.8 (4)C2—C7—C6—C5−0.6 (8)
C3—C4—C5—C60.3 (7)C4—C5—C6—C70.5 (8)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···Br1i0.892.593.434 (4)159
N2—H2B···Br1ii0.892.463.337 (4)169
N2—H2C···Br10.892.453.299 (4)160
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N2—H2A⋯Br1i0.892.593.434 (4)159
N2—H2B⋯Br1ii0.892.463.337 (4)169
N2—H2C⋯Br10.892.453.299 (4)160

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  4 in total

1.  Dielectric anisotropy of a homochiral trinuclear nickel(II) complex.

Authors:  Da-Wei Fu; Yu-Mei Song; Guo-Xi Wang; Qiong Ye; Ren-Gen Xiong; Tomoyuki Akutagawa; Takayoshi Nakamura; Philip Wai Hong Chan; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  The first metal-organic framework (MOF) of Imazethapyr and its SHG, piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties.

Authors:  Da-Wei Fu; Wen Zhang; Ren-Gen Xiong
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  3-Cyano-anilinium chloride.

Authors:  Xiao-Chun Wen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-07-12
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  2-Cyano-1-methyl-pyridinium nitrate.

Authors:  Lynn V Koplitz; Joel T Mague; Michael N Kammer; Cameron A McCormick; Heather E Renfro; David J Vumbaco
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-05-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.