Literature DB >> 21577160

Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: long-term outcome, morbidity, and the learning curve from the first 50 cases.

Richard J Mannion1, Matthew R Guilfoyle, Johnny Efendy, Adrian M Nowitzke, Rodney J Laing, Martin J Wood.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with the first 50 cases of minimally invasive lumbar canal decompression in terms of patient outcome up to 2 years, the learning curve incurred, and complications when compared with our most recent 50 cases. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar canal stenosis is a common condition in the elderly population, the symptoms of which respond well to surgical decompression. A minimally invasive approach offers potential short and long-term benefits to patients but the technique is associated with a learning curve and equivalence to open surgery regarding efficacy and complications needs to be demonstrated.
METHODS: Fifty patients (mean age 70 y) who presented with clinical and radiological features of lumbar canal stenosis and who had failed a period of conservative management underwent lumbar canal decompression through a paramedian oblique, muscle splitting approach using a 16 to 18 mm operating tube and microscope. Outcome was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index and Short Form-36 at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years.
RESULTS: Significant clinical improvements were seen at 3 months that were sustained at 1 and 2 years. Clinical outcome improved whereas operative time and complications fell as experience increased, helping to define the learning curve with this technique.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive lumbar decompression seems to offer patients a clinical benefit comparable to that observed in published open series, with potential advantages in terms of postoperative pain and recovery. However, there is a learning curve and whether this technique offers long-term benefits with regard to a reduction in back pain or postoperative spondylolisthesis is not yet known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21577160     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31820baa1e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  10 in total

Review 1.  Multilevel mini-open TLIFs and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: description of a simple technical nuance used to increase intraoperative safety and improve workflow. Tips and tricks and review of the literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Francesco Certo; Massimiliano Visocchi; Giovanni Sciacca; Mario Piccini; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao; Andrew C Kam; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: The Learning Curve of a Single Surgeon.

Authors:  Gil Kimchi; Alon Orlev; Amir Hadanny; Nachshon Knoller; Ran Harel
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-10-10

Review 4.  The clinical course of pain and disability following surgery for spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Carolina G Fritsch; Manuela L Ferreira; Christopher G Maher; Robert D Herbert; Rafael Z Pinto; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparing miniopen and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion in single-level lumbar degeneration.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Lo; Chien-Min Lin; Yi-Shian Yeh; Yu-Kai Su; Yuan-Yun Tseng; Shun-Tai Yang; Jai-Wei Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Assessment of the Learning Curve for Microendoscopic Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis through an Analysis of 480 Cases Involving a Single Surgeon.

Authors:  Kazunori Nomura; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-02-01

7.  Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jinqiu Zhao; Shujun Zhang; Xiaosong Li; Bin He; Yunsheng Ou; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-12-01

8.  Physician-Related Variability in the Outcomes of an Invasive Treatment for Neck and Back Pain: A Multi-Level Analysis of Data Gathered in Routine Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ana Royuela; Francisco M Kovacs; Jesús Seco-Calvo; Borja M Fernández-Félix; Víctor Abraira; Javier Zamora
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  CT and MRI Determination of Intermuscular Space within Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles at Different Intervertebral Disc Levels.

Authors:  Xuefei Deng; Youzhi Zhu; Shidong Wang; Yu Zhang; Hui Han; Dengquan Zheng; Zihai Ding; Kelvin K L Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Differences in the Exposure of the Lumbar Nerve Root Between Experts and Novices: Results From a Realistic Simulation Pilot Study With Force Sensors.

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; Werner Korb; Esther Fenyöházi; Davide Iacovazzi; Luis Bernal; Michael H Mayer
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-04-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.