Literature DB >> 2157554

A randomized trial fo three cisplatin-containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a study of the Umbrian Lung Cancer Group.

L Crino1, M Tonato, S Darwish, M L Meacci, E Corgna, F Di Costanzo, F Buzzi, G Fornari, E Santi, E Ballatori.   

Abstract

Survival in patients with locally advanced (stage III Mo) and metastatic (Ml) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is short. Phase II studies have reported objective responses ranging from 20% to 60% using cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimens, yet few have shown improvement in median survival. In our phase II pilot studies with cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (VP-16), we observed a 26% response rate; with CDDP, VP-16, and mitomycin-C, a 38% response rate was obtained in advanced NSCLC patients. A total of 156 consecutive patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC were randomized to one of three treatment arms to determine whether the chemotherapy protocols had any effect on response rate and median survival in a large, randomized study. Arm 1 consisted of CDDP (120 mg/m2 x 3 weeks); arm 2, of CDDP (120 mg/m2) and VP-16 (100 mg/m2 given i.v. on days 1-3), repeated every 3 weeks; and arm 3, of CDDP (120 mg/m2) and VP-16 (100 mg/m2 on days 1-3) given every 3 weeks, plus mitomycin C (10 mg/m2 on days 1, 21, and 42, then every 6 weeks, for a maximal dose of 100 mg). After 71 patients had been enrolled in the study, we stopped accrual in the CDDP arm due to a lack of response [1 complete response (CR) in 24 patients; 4%] and continued enrollment in the two combination-chemotherapy arms. In the CDDP/VP-16 arm a 30% response rate [1 CR, 18 partial responses (PRs)] was obtained, and in the CDDP/VP-16 mitomycin C arm a 26% response rate (4 CRs, 11 PRs) was seen among a total of 150 evaluable patients. Responses were observed in 31% of patients with favorable performance status (PS) (ECOG 0-1) vs 14% in patients with a poor PS (ECOG 2-3). Of patients with locally advanced disease (III Mo), 17 (33%) obtained an objective response, compared with 20 patients (20%) with metastatic disease. Median survival was 18 weeks in the CDDP arm, 35 weeks in the CDDP/VP-16 arm, and 37 weeks in the CDDP/VP-16/mitomycin C arm. The median survival in the multimodal chemotherapy arms was significantly greater than that obtained with CDDP alone. Toxicity was predominantly myelosuppression in the mitomycin C-containing arm (27%, wtto grade 3-4). Our study shows that combination chemotherapy using CDDP/VP-16 is active and safe in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients with a good performance status. The addition of mitomycin C did not improve the therapeutic response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2157554     DOI: 10.1007/BF02940294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  15 in total

1.  Random prospective study of vindesine versus vindesine plus high-dose cisplatin versus vindesine plus cisplatin plus mitomycin C in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  L H Einhorn; P J Loehrer; S D Williams; S Meyers; T Gabrys; S R Nattan; R Woodburn; R Drasga; J Songer; W Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: to treat or not to treat?

Authors:  H H Hansen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Brief overview of combination chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  P Bonomi
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 4.  A new international staging system for lung cancer.

Authors:  C F Mountain
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  The importance of dose intensity in chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  W Hryniuk; H Bush
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Survival with inoperable lung cancer: an integration of prognostic variables based on simple clinical criteria.

Authors:  V J Lanzotti; D R Thomas; L E Boyle; T L Smith; E A Gehan; M L Samuels
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A randomized trial of the four most active regimens for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J C Ruckdeschel; D M Finkelstein; D S Ettinger; R H Creech; B A Mason; R A Joss; S Vogl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Chemotherapy can prolong survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer--report of a Canadian multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  E Rapp; J L Pater; A Willan; Y Cormier; N Murray; W K Evans; D I Hodson; D A Clark; R Feld; A M Arnold
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Evaluation of response criteria in advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  R T Eagan; T R Fleming; V Schoonover
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Cisplatin and vindesine combination chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the lung: A randomized trial investigating two dosage schedules.

Authors:  R J Gralla; E S Casper; D P Kelsen; D W Braun; M E Dukeman; N Martini; C W Young; R B Golbey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  7 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of gemcitabine single agent therapy compared with standard treatment in stage IIIB and IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  G R Tennvall; J O Fernberg
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Cisplatin/carboplatin + etoposide + vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Gruppo Oncologico Campano.

Authors:  P Comella; G Frasci; G De Cataldis; N Panza; R Cioffi; C Curcio; M Belli; A Bianco; G Ianniello; L Maiorino; M Della Vittoria; J Perchard; G Comella
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 3.  Platinum drugs in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J Cosaert; E Quoix
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  The role of mitomycin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  J P Sculier; L Ghisdal; T Berghmans; F Branle; J J Lafitte; F Vallot; A P Meert; F Lemaitre; E Steels; A Burniat; C Mascaux
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Phase III randomized trial comparing moderate-dose cisplatin to combined cisplatin and carboplatin in addition to mitomycin and ifosfamide in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  J P Sculier; J J Lafitte; M Paesmans; J Thiriaux; C G Alexopoulos; J Baumöhl; J Schmerber; G Koumakis; M C Florin; C Zacharias; T Berghmans; P Mommen; V Ninane; J Klastersky
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Pharmacoeconomic benefit of cisplatin and etoposide chemoregimen for metastatic non small cell lung cancer: An Indian study.

Authors:  Mangesh P Kamath; K C Lakshmaiah; K Govind Babu; D Loknatha; Linu A Jacob; Suresh Mc Babu
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  The case for the introduction of new chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer in the wake of the findings of The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE).

Authors:  J S Waters; M E R O'Brien
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.