Literature DB >> 3510278

A randomized trial of the four most active regimens for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

J C Ruckdeschel, D M Finkelstein, D S Ettinger, R H Creech, B A Mason, R A Joss, S Vogl.   

Abstract

Between October 1981 and June 1983, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a prospectively randomized trial (EST 1581) of the four most active chemotherapy regimens for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Four hundred eighty-six good performance status patients (PS 0 or 1; 81%) were randomized to receive cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and procarbazine (CAMP); mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP); etoposide and cisplatin (VP-P); or vindesine and cisplatin (VDA-P). All regimens were administered in the doses and schedules originally reported. Complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) rates for the four regimens were CAMP, 17%; MVP, 31%; VP-P, 20%; and VDA-P, 25%. The response rate for MVP was significantly higher in patients with squamous and adenocarcinoma histologies, but there was no impact on median survival (overall, 24.5 weeks). The duration of response did not differ by treatment as previously suggested for VDA-P. There were 15 CRs (CAMP, one; MVP, six; VP-P, two; VDA-P, six), and 12 patients have survived more than 2 years. Toxicity was significant with 20 treatment-related deaths. CAMP was significantly less toxic than the other regimens (P less than .001). VDA-P demonstrated significantly more life-threatening (seven) and lethal (three) episodes of nephrotoxicity (P less than .001) despite an aggressive hydration program that in itself caused significant morbidity. Analysis of the toxicity data showed, however, that most of the severe toxicity occurred in the 19% of patients who were initially PS 2, suggesting that they are not appropriate candidates for trials of new agents or combinations. None of these regimens can be recommended as a standard therapy for metastatic NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3510278     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  51 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C J Sweeney; A B Sandler
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  F Nomura; K Shimokata; H Saito; S Sakai; A Watanabe; H Saka
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer: multiregression analysis in the National Cancer Center Hospital (Japan).

Authors:  M Sakurai; T Shinkai; K Eguchi; Y Sasaki; T Tamura; K Miura; Y Fujiwara; A Otsu; N Horiuchi; H Nakano
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer with vinblastine and very high-dose cisplatin. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  S M Grunberg; J J Crowley; R B Livingston; F M Muggia; J S MacDonald; S K Williamson; R L Stephens
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Phase II study of mitomycin C, etoposide and vindesine in metastatic stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  C Gridelli; R Pepe; S Palmeri; S Iacobelli; M Gentile; V Gebbia; C Garufi; G Airoma; G Palmieri; A Russo
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  The benefit of cisplatin-based polychemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the lung. The Kyushu Lung Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group.

Authors:  N Hara; M Ohta; Y Ichikawa; T Kanda; K Shima; K Tamura; M Hokama
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Comprehensive metastatic lung cancer care must include palliative care.

Authors:  A M Rosenblum; M Chasen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  Clinician Perspectives on Current Issues in Lung Cancer Drug Development.

Authors:  Saiama N Waqar; Philip D Bonomi; Ramaswamy Govindan; Fred R Hirsch; Gregory J Riely; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Dickran Kazandjian; Sean Khozin; Erin Larkins; Dane J Dickson; Shakun Malik; Leora Horn; Andrea Ferris; Alice T Shaw; Pasi A Jänne; Tony S K Mok; Roy Herbst; Patricia Keegan; Richard Pazdur; Gideon M Blumenthal
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer in routine care: a retrospective analysis of 212 consecutive patients treated in a community based oncology group practice.

Authors:  Hubert Koeppler; Jochen Heymanns; Joerg Thomalla; Kristina Kleboth; Ulrike Mergenthaler; Rudolf Weide
Journal:  Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2009-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.