Literature DB >> 21575119

Ethnic differences in macular thickness.

Yasser M Tariq1, Haitao Li, George Burlutsky, Paul Mitchell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine ethnic differences in time-domain (Stratus) optical coherence tomography-measured macular thickness in 12-year-old children.
DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2367 children from grade 7 (mean age 12.7 ± 0.45 years) examined during the Sydney Myopia Study during 2004-2005.
METHODS: Examination included determination of best corrected visual acuity. Autorefraction was performed after cycloplegia. Axial length was measured using non-contact interferometry and OCT was performed using Stratus OCT. Ethnicity was self reported by participants' parents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Macular thickness.
RESULTS: The four largest ethnic groups were Caucasian (n = 1224), East Asian (n = 291), South Asian (n = 107) and Middle Eastern (n = 146). The greatest ethnic differences were found at the central macula, which was significantly thicker in Caucasian compared with East Asian, South Asian and Middle Eastern children (mean differences 9.0 µm, 12.1 µm and 6.5 µm, respectively; all P < 0.0001). The average inner macula was significantly thicker in Caucasian than East Asian and South Asian children (P = 0.005 and P < 0.0001, respectively). The average outer macula was significantly thicker in Caucasian than Middle Eastern and South Asian children (P = 0.03 and P < 0.0001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Macular parameters were found to vary by ethnicity in 12-year-old children. Caucasian children had the thickest macular parameters and South Asian children had the thinnest. The greatest differences were found in the central macula.
© 2011 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2011 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21575119     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02593.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  9 in total

1.  A sloped piecemeal Gaussian model for characterising foveal pit shape.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Elise N Harb; Wei Hou; Qinghua Zhang; Heather A Anderson; Thomas T Norton; Katherine K Weise; Jane E Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Macular findings in healthy full-term Hispanic newborns observed by hand-held spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Michelle T Cabrera; Rachelle V O'Connell; Cynthia A Toth; Ramiro S Maldonado; Du Tran-Viet; Michael J Allingham; Stephanie J Chiu; Sina Farsiu; Gabriela M Maradiaga Panayotti; Geeta K Swamy; Sharon F Freedman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.300

3.  Association Between Fluid Volume in Inner Nuclear Layer and Visual Acuity in Diabetic Macular Edema.

Authors:  Kotaro Tsuboi; Qi Sheng You; Yukun Guo; Jie Wang; Christina J Flaxel; Steven T Bailey; David Huang; Yali Jia; Thomas S Hwang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Macular thickness in healthy eyes of adults (N = 4508) and relation to sex, age and refraction: the Tromsø Eye Study (2007-2008).

Authors:  Therese von Hanno; Anette C Lade; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Tunde Peto; Inger Njølstad; Geir Bertelsen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 3.761

5.  Association of Macular Thickness With Age and Age-Related Macular Degeneration in the Carotenoids in Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (CAREDS2), An Ancillary Study of the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Tyler Etheridge; Zhe Liu; Marine Nalbandyan; Spencer Cleland; Barbara A Blodi; Julie A Mares; Steven Bailey; Robert Wallace; Karen Gehrs; Lesley F Tinker; Ronald Gangnon; Amitha Domalpally
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Normative data and repeatability for macular ganglion cell layer thickness in healthy Swedish children using swept source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Philip Wolf; Eva Larsson; Hanna Åkerblom
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  All retinas are not created equal: Fovea-to-macula thickness ratio and foveal microvasculature in healthy young children.

Authors:  Pelsin Demir; Nathaniel Hovsepian; Peter Pagels; Vanja Petersson; Karthikeyan Baskaran; Antonio Filipe Macedo
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.992

8.  Retinal thickness in healthy Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.

Authors:  Rebecca A Cox; Scott A Read; Shelley Hopkins; David Alonso-Caneiro; Joanne M Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Retinal Parameters as Compared with Head Circumference, Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index in Children in Kenya and Bhutan.

Authors:  Sara J Grundy; Lhab Tshering; Stanley W Wanjala; Megan B Diamond; Martin S Audi; Sashank Prasad; Russell T Shinohara; Debora Rogo; Dechen Wangmo; Ugyen Wangdi; Abi Aarayang; Thukten Tshering; Thomas F Burke; Farrah J Mateen
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.345

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.