Literature DB >> 27790770

A sloped piecemeal Gaussian model for characterising foveal pit shape.

Lei Liu1, Wendy Marsh-Tootle2, Elise N Harb3, Wei Hou4, Qinghua Zhang4, Heather A Anderson5, Thomas T Norton2, Katherine K Weise2, Jane E Gwiazda6, Leslie Hyman4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High-quality optical coherence tomography (OCT) macular scans make it possible to distinguish a range of normal and diseased states by characterising foveal pit shape. Existing mathematical models lack the flexibility to capture all known pit variations and thus characterise the pit with limited accuracy. This study aimed to develop a new model that provides a more robust characterisation of individual foveal pit variations.
METHODS: A Sloped Piecemeal Gaussian (SPG) model, consisting of a linear combination of a tilted line and a piecemeal Gaussian function (two halves of a Gaussian connected by a separate straight line), was developed to fit retinal thickness data with the flexibility to characterise different degrees of pit asymmetry and pit bottom flatness. It fitted the raw pit data between the two rims of the fovea to improve accuracy. The model was tested on 3488 macular scans from both eyes of 581 young adults (376 myopes and 206 non-myopes, mean (S.D.) age 21.9 (1.4) years). Estimates for retinal thickness, wall height and slope, pit depth and width were derived from the best-fitting model curve. Ten variations of Gaussian and Difference of Gaussian models were fitted to the same scans and compared with the SPG model for goodness of fit (by Root mean square error, RMSE), model complexity (by the Bayesian Information Criteria) and model fidelity.
RESULTS: The SPG model produced excellent goodness of fit (mean RMSE = 4.25 and 3.89 μm; 95% CI: 4.20, 4.30 and 3.86, 3.93 for fitting horizontal and vertical profiles respectively). The SPG model showed pit asymmetry, with average nasal walls 17.6 (11.6) μm higher and 0.96 (0.61)° steeper than temporal walls and average superior walls 7.0 (12.2) μm higher and 0.41 (0.65)° steeper than the inferior walls. The SPG model also revealed a continuum of human foveal shapes, from round bottoms to extended flat bottoms (up to 563 μm). 49.1% of foveal profiles were best fitted with a flat bottom >30 μm wide. Compared with the other tested models, the SPG was the preferred model overall based on the Bayesian Information Criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: The SPG is a new parsimonious mathematical model that improves upon other models by accounting for wall asymmetry and flat pit bottoms, providing an excellent fit and more faithful characterisation of typical foveal pit shapes and their known variations. This new model may be helpful in distinguishing normal foveal shape variations by refractive status as well by other characteristics such as sex, ethnicity and age.
© 2016 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2016 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  foveal pit; human retina; mathematical model; optical coherence tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27790770      PMCID: PMC7027304          DOI: 10.1111/opo.12321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  56 in total

1.  Development of the primate area of high acuity. 1. Use of finite element analysis models to identify mechanical variables affecting pit formation.

Authors:  A D Springer; A E Hendrickson
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

2.  Use of optical coherence tomography to assess variations in macular retinal thickness in myopia.

Authors:  Marcus C C Lim; Sek-Tien Hoh; Paul J Foster; Tock-Han Lim; Sek-Jin Chew; Steve K L Seah; Tin Aung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Parametric model for the 3D reconstruction of individual fovea shape from OCT data.

Authors:  Patrick Scheibe; Anfisa Lazareva; Ulf-Dietrich Braumann; Andreas Reichenbach; Peter Wiedemann; Mike Francke; Franziska Georgia Rauscher
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Comparison of OCT measurements between high myopic and low myopic children.

Authors:  Hyun-Taek Lim; Bo Young Chun
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Prevalence and progression of myopic retinopathy in Chinese adults: the Beijing Eye Study.

Authors:  Hai Hua Liu; Liang Xu; Ya Xing Wang; Shuang Wang; Qi Sheng You; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Measurement of retinal thickness in macular region of high myopic eyes using spectral domain OCT.

Authors:  Ai-Ping Song; Xin-Yi Wu; Jian-Rong Wang; Wei Liu; Yan Sun; Tao Yu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Foveal shape and structure in a normal population.

Authors:  Sarah Tick; Florence Rossant; Itebeddine Ghorbel; Alain Gaudric; José-Alain Sahel; Philippe Chaumet-Riffaud; Michel Paques
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Macular thickness assessment in healthy eyes based on ethnicity using Stratus OCT optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Patrick J Kelty; John F Payne; Rupal H Trivedi; Jason Kelty; Esther M Bowie; Berdine M Burger
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Retinal thickness analysis by race, gender, and age using Stratus OCT.

Authors:  Amir H Kashani; Ingrid E Zimmer-Galler; Syed Mahmood Shah; Laurie Dustin; Diana V Do; Dean Eliott; Julia A Haller; Quan Dong Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  FOVEA: a new program to standardize the measurement of foveal pit morphology.

Authors:  Bret A Moore; Innfarn Yoo; Luke P Tyrrell; Bedrich Benes; Esteban Fernandez-Juricic
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  7 in total

1.  Wide-based foveal pit: a predisposition to idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  I-Hsin Ma; Chung-May Yang; Yi-Ting Hsieh
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  CuBe: parametric modeling of 3D foveal shape using cubic Bézier.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar Yadav; Seyedamirhosein Motamedi; Timm Oberwahrenbrock; Frederike Cosima Oertel; Konrad Polthier; Friedemann Paul; Ella Maria Kadas; Alexander U Brandt
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Direct modeling of foveal pit morphology from distortion-corrected OCT images.

Authors:  Katharina Breher; Rajat Agarwala; Alexander Leube; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Interindividual Variations in Foveal Anatomy and Artifacts Seen on Inner Retinal Probability Maps from Spectral Domain OCT Scans of the Macula.

Authors:  Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Hassan Muhammad; Khushmit Kaur; Diane Wang; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  POTENTIAL UTILITY OF FOVEAL MORPHOLOGY IN PRETERM INFANTS MEASURED USING HAND-HELD OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY SCREENING.

Authors:  Samira Anwar; Mintu Nath; Aarti Patel; Helena Lee; Samantha Brown; Irene Gottlob; Frank A Proudlock
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.975

6.  Myopia induces meridional growth asymmetry of the retina: a pilot study using wide-field swept-source OCT.

Authors:  Katharina Breher; Arne Ohlendorf; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Fovea in Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Authors:  James D Akula; Ivana A Arellano; Emily A Swanson; Tara L Favazza; Theodore S Bowe; Robert J Munro; R Daniel Ferguson; Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz; Anne B Fulton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.