Vanessa Beavan1, John Read, Claire Cartwright. 1. First Episode Psychosis Team, St Lukes Community Mental Health Centre, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is increasingly understood that voice-hearing is neither a rare phenomenon experienced only by 'psychiatric patients' nor a meaningless symptom of a 'mental illness'. AIMS: To estimate the prevalence of voice-hearing in the adult general population. METHODS: PsycINFO and relevant literature reviews were searched for studies of the prevalence of verbal auditory hallucinations among adults. RESULTS: Seventeen surveys, from nine countries, were identified. Comparisons across studies were problematic due to differences in definitions, methodologies, and cultural factors. Prevalence ranged from 0.6% to 84%, with an interquartile range (excluding the highest and lowest quartiles) of 3.1%-19.5%, and a median of 13.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in prevalence can be attributed in part to differences in definitions and methodologies, but also to true variations based on gender, ethnicity and environmental context. The findings support the current movement away from pathological models of unusual experiences and towards understanding voice-hearing as occurring on a continuum in the general population, and having meaning in relation to the voice-hearer's life experiences.
BACKGROUND: It is increasingly understood that voice-hearing is neither a rare phenomenon experienced only by 'psychiatricpatients' nor a meaningless symptom of a 'mental illness'. AIMS: To estimate the prevalence of voice-hearing in the adult general population. METHODS: PsycINFO and relevant literature reviews were searched for studies of the prevalence of verbal auditory hallucinations among adults. RESULTS: Seventeen surveys, from nine countries, were identified. Comparisons across studies were problematic due to differences in definitions, methodologies, and cultural factors. Prevalence ranged from 0.6% to 84%, with an interquartile range (excluding the highest and lowest quartiles) of 3.1%-19.5%, and a median of 13.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in prevalence can be attributed in part to differences in definitions and methodologies, but also to true variations based on gender, ethnicity and environmental context. The findings support the current movement away from pathological models of unusual experiences and towards understanding voice-hearing as occurring on a continuum in the general population, and having meaning in relation to the voice-hearer's life experiences.
Authors: Sara Siddi; Susana Ochoa; Aida Farreny; Gildas Brébion; Frank Larøi; Jorge Cuevas-Esteban; Josep Maria Haro; Christian Stephan-Otto; Antonio Preti Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Mark Shevlin; Tara O'Neill; James E Houston; John Read; Richard P Bentall; Jamie Murphy Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2012-09-09 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Richard P Bentall; Paulo de Sousa; Filippo Varese; Sophie Wickham; Katarzyna Sitko; Maria Haarmans; John Read Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 4.328