Literature DB >> 21572404

The dichotomy in carcinogenesis of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction: intestinal-type vs cardiac-type mucosa-associated adenocarcinoma.

Elizabeth G Demicco1, Alton B Farris, Yoshifumi Baba, Brian Agbor-Etang, Kristin Bergethon, Rajni Mandal, Diane Daives, Junya Fukuoka, Michio Shimizu, Dora Dias-Santagata, Shuji Ogino, A John Iafrate, Henning A Gaissert, Mari Mino-Kenudson.   

Abstract

Adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction continues to rise in incidence. An intestinal metaplasia (Barrett esophagus)-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence induced by gastroesophageal reflux disease is well established. However, a significant number of adenocarcinomas in the vicinity of the esophagogastric junction are seen in the background of gastric/cardiac-type mucosa without intestinal metaplasia. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of Barrett esophagus (intestinal-type mucosa) in the classification and prognosis of tumors of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics were examined in 157 consecutively resected adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction and were compared between tumors arising in association with intestinal-type and cardiac-type mucosa. Intestinal-type mucosa-associated adenocarcinomas were more likely to be associated with younger age (P=0.0057), reflux symptoms (P<0.0001), proximal location (P=0.0009), lower T stage (P<0.0001), fewer nodal metastases (P=0.0001), absence of lymphatic (P<0.0001), venous (P=0.0060) or perineural (P<0.0001) invasion. Histologically, intestinal-type mucosa-associated tumors were more likely to be low-grade glandular tumors (P=0.0095) of intestinal or mixed immunophenotype (P=0.015) and express nuclear β-catenin (P=0.0080), whereas tumors arising in a background of cardiac-type mucosa were more frequently associated with EGFR amplification (P=0.0051). Five-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in patients with intestinal-type mucosa-associated tumors (28 vs 9%, P=0.0015), although no survival benefit was seen after adjusting for potential confounders. Our findings support the theory that multiple distinct pathways of tumorigenesis exist in the vicinity of the esophagogastric junction, including one in which tumors arise from dysplastic intestinal metaplasia (intestinal pathway), and one potentially involving dysplasia of the cardiac-type mucosa (non-intestinal pathway). Additional studies are warranted to further clarify their pathogenesis and the molecular mechanisms involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21572404     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Barrett's esophagus. An update].

Authors:  G B Baretton; D E Aust
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  Barrett's Esophagus: A Comprehensive and Contemporary Review for Pathologists.

Authors:  Bita V Naini; Rhonda F Souza; Robert D Odze
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: controversial classification, surgical management, and clinicopathology.

Authors:  Lei Huang; A-Man Xu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: prevalence of prior and concurrent Barrett's oesophagus in oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

Authors:  Mimi C Tan; Nabil Mansour; Donna L White; Amy Sisson; Hashem B El-Serag; Aaron P Thrift
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Kyoto international consensus report on anatomy, pathophysiology and clinical significance of the gastro-oesophageal junction.

Authors:  Kentaro Sugano; Stuart Jon Spechler; Emad M El-Omar; Kenneth E L McColl; Kaiyo Takubo; Takuji Gotoda; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Katsunori Iijima; Haruhiro Inoue; Takashi Kawai; Yoshikazu Kinoshita; Hiroto Miwa; Ken-Ichi Mukaisho; Kazunari Murakami; Yasuyuki Seto; Hisao Tajiri; Shobna Bhatia; Myung-Gyu Choi; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Kwong Ming Fock; Khean-Lee Goh; Khek Yu Ho; Varocha Mahachai; Maria O'Donovan; Robert Odze; Richard Peek; Massimo Rugge; Prateek Sharma; Jose D Sollano; Michael Vieth; Justin Wu; Ming-Shiang Wu; Duowu Zou; Michio Kaminishi; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 31.793

6.  MUC2 expression is an adverse prognostic factor in superficial gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Jon M Davison; Shane T Ellis; Tyler J Foxwell; James D Luketich; Michael K Gibson; Shih-Fan Kuan; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Dysplasia discrimination in intestinal-type neoplasia of the esophagus and colon via digital image analysis.

Authors:  David R Martin; David R Braxton; Alton B Farris
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Esophageal carcinoma cell line with high EGFR polysomy is responsive to gefitinib.

Authors:  Astrid Drenckhan; Tobias Grob; Anna Dupree; Thorsten Dohrmann; Oliver Mann; Jakob R Izbicki; Stephanie J Gros
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Histology of Barrett's Metaplasia: Do Goblet Cells Matter?

Authors:  Robert Odze
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Barrett esophagus: history, definition and etiopathogeny.

Authors:  C Gindea; R Birla; P Hoara; A Caragui; S Constantinoiu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.