Literature DB >> 21572115

Clinical evaluation of cardiovascular devices: principles, problems, and proposals for European regulatory reform. Report of a policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology.

Alan G Fraser1, Jean-Claude Daubert, Frans Van de Werf, N A Mark Estes, Sidney C Smith, Mitchell W Krucoff, Panos E Vardas, Michel Komajda.   

Abstract

The European Commission announced in 2008 that a fundamental revision of the medical device directives is being considered in order to clarify and strengthen the current legal framework. The system for testing and approving devices in Europe was established >20 years ago as a 'New Approach' to a previously little-regulated industry. It is recognized by many that the regulatory system has not kept pace with technological advances and changing patterns of medical practice. New legislation will be drafted during 2011, but medical experts have been little involved in this important process. This context makes it an opportune time for a professional association to advise from both clinical and academic perspectives about changes which should be made to improve the safety and efficacy of devices used in clinical practice and to develop more appropriate systems for their clinical evaluation and post-marketing surveillance. This report summarizes how medical devices are regulated and it reviews some serious clinical problems that have occurred with cardiovascular devices. Finally, it presents the main recommendations from a Policy Conference on the Clinical Evaluation of Cardiovascular Devices that was held at the European Heart House in January 2011.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21572115     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  15 in total

1.  Regulation of medical devices used in diabetology in Europe: time for reform?

Authors:  A J M Boulton; S Del Prato
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Design of a pulsatile flow facility to evaluate thrombogenic potential of implantable cardiac devices.

Authors:  Sivakkumar Arjunon; Pablo Hidalgo Ardana; Neelakantan Saikrishnan; Shalv Madhani; Brent Foster; Ari Glezer; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Rejoinder.

Authors:  S Shamanna Iyengar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2014-03-04

Review 4.  An evaluation of regulatory and commercial barriers to stratified medicine development and adoption.

Authors:  N A Meadows; A Morrison; D A Brindley; A Schuh; R W Barker
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 5.  Primary hip replacement prostheses and their evidence base: systematic review of literature.

Authors:  F Kynaston-Pearson; A M Ashmore; T T Malak; I Rombach; A Taylor; D Beard; N K Arden; A Price; D Prieto-Alhambra; A Judge; A J Carr; S Glyn-Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-12-19

Review 6.  Post-marketing surveillance in the published medical and grey literature for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheters: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Polisena; Alan J Forster; Karen Cimon; Danielle Rabb
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-10

7.  Contrasting clinical evidence for market authorisation of cardio-vascular devices in Europe and the USA: a systematic analysis of 10 devices based on Austrian pre-reimbursement assessments.

Authors:  Claudia Wild; Judit Erdös; Ingrid Zechmeister
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Comparison of rates of safety issues and reporting of trial outcomes for medical devices approved in the European Union and United States: cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas J Hwang; Elisaveta Sokolov; Jessica M Franklin; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 9.  How does medical device regulation perform in the United States and the European union? A systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel B Kramer; Shuai Xu; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Medical device regulation: time to improve performance.

Authors:  Sanket S Dhruva; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.