A Scott Nielsen1, John D Halamka, R Philip Kinkel. 1. Department of Neurology, Section of Demyelinating Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. anielsen@bidmc.harvard.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of a secure internet portal in an academic Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective case-control chart review of 240 patients during the years 2008 and 2009. Patient demographic and clinical information was extracted from our online medical records, and portal use metrics were provided by Information Systems. Descriptive statistics were utilized to explore characteristics of portal users, how the portal is used, and what associations exist between medical resource utilization and active portal use. Logistic regression identified independent patient predictors and barriers to portal use. RESULTS: Portal users tended to be young professionals with minimal physical disability. The most frequently used portal feature was secure patient-physician messaging. Message content largely consisted of requests for medications or refills in addition to self-reported side effects. Independent predictors and barriers of portal use include the number of medications prescribed by our staff (OR 1.69, p<0.0001), Caucasian ethnicity (OR 5.04, p=0.007), arm and hand disability (OR 0.23, p=0.01), and impaired vision (OR 0.31, p=0.01). Discussion MS patients use the internet in a greater proportion than the general US population, yet physical disability limits their access. Technological adaptations such as voice-activated commands and easy font-size adjustment may help patients overcome these barriers. CONCLUSION: Future research should explore the influence of portal technology on healthcare resource utilization and cost. Additional emedicine applications could be linked to the patient portal for disease monitoring and prospective investigation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of a secure internet portal in an academic Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective case-control chart review of 240 patients during the years 2008 and 2009. Patient demographic and clinical information was extracted from our online medical records, and portal use metrics were provided by Information Systems. Descriptive statistics were utilized to explore characteristics of portal users, how the portal is used, and what associations exist between medical resource utilization and active portal use. Logistic regression identified independent patient predictors and barriers to portal use. RESULTS: Portal users tended to be young professionals with minimal physical disability. The most frequently used portal feature was secure patient-physician messaging. Message content largely consisted of requests for medications or refills in addition to self-reported side effects. Independent predictors and barriers of portal use include the number of medications prescribed by our staff (OR 1.69, p<0.0001), Caucasian ethnicity (OR 5.04, p=0.007), arm and hand disability (OR 0.23, p=0.01), and impaired vision (OR 0.31, p=0.01). Discussion MSpatients use the internet in a greater proportion than the general US population, yet physical disability limits their access. Technological adaptations such as voice-activated commands and easy font-size adjustment may help patients overcome these barriers. CONCLUSION: Future research should explore the influence of portal technology on healthcare resource utilization and cost. Additional emedicine applications could be linked to the patient portal for disease monitoring and prospective investigation.
Authors: Deborah M Miller; Shirley M Moore; Robert J Fox; Ashish Atreja; Alex Z Fu; Jar-Chi Lee; Welf Saupe; Maria Stadtler; Swati Chakraborty; C M Harris; Richard A Rudick Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2011-01-09 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: S P Morrissey; D H Miller; B E Kendall; D P Kingsley; M A Kelly; D A Francis; D G MacManus; W I McDonald Journal: Brain Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Gilles Edan; Massimo Filippi; Hans-Peter Hartung; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Luanne M Metz; Henry F McFarland; Paul W O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Brian G Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Terese Otte-Trojel; Antoinette de Bont; Thomas G Rundall; Joris van de Klundert Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Bradley H Crotty; Yonas Tamrat; Arash Mostaghimi; Charles Safran; Bruce E Landon Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Xiaoqian Jiang; Aziz A Boxwala; Robert El-Kareh; Jihoon Kim; Lucila Ohno-Machado Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Terese Otte-Trojel; Antoinette de Bont; Joris van de Klundert; Thomas G Rundall Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-11-21 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Peter Joseph Jongen; Evert Sanders; Cees Zwanikken; Jan Koeman; Leo H Visser; Petra Koopmans; Dirk Lehnick Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 2.711