Literature DB >> 21571031

Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair.

B A C Loomans1, M V Cardoso, N J M Opdam, F J M Roeters, J De Munck, M C D N J M Huysmans, B Van Meerbeek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In search for clinically effective composite repair protocols, the effect of various etching protocols on the surface roughness of composite resins with different filler composition were investigated.
METHODS: Of two composite resins (hybrid-filled Clearfil AP-X; nano-filled Filtek Supreme XT) specimens of 3mm thick with a diameter of 7 mm were prepared (n=24). The top surface was polished with 4000-grit SiC-abrasive paper and subjected to one of eight surface treatments: (n=3): negative control (NC), 37% phosphoric acid for 20s (37PA-20s), 3% hydrofluoric acid for 20s (3HF-20s), for 120 s (3HF-120 s), 9.6% hydrofluoric acid for 20s (9.6HF-20s), for 120 s (9.6%HF-120 s), 37PA-20s followed by 9.6%HF for 120 s (37PA-20s/9.6HF-120 s) and 9.6%HF for 120 s followed by 37PA-20s (9.6HF-120s/37PA-20s). Roughness (S(a)) was measured using a 3D noncontact optical interferometer (WYKO) and surface topography imaged by SEM. Multilevel models were used to estimate the variances within a sample and between samples in each group. Using the resulting overall variances and the means for each group, the eight groups were compared consecutively using t-tests (p<0.05).
RESULTS: The hybrid-filled composite resin demonstrated a significantly rougher surface than the nano-filled (p<0.05). For both composites 9.6%HF-120 s, 37PA-20s/9.6HF-120 s and 9.6%HF-120 s/37PA-20s resulted in a large increase in roughness compared to the other groups (p<0.05). For the hybrid-filled, the succeeding groups (37PA-20s, 3HF-20s, 3HF-120 s and 9.6HF-20s) resulted in a statistically significant increase in surface roughness (p<0.02). For the nano-filled only a statistically significant increase in roughness was found between 3HF-20s and 3HF-120 s (p<0.001) and between 9.6HF-20s and 9.6HF-120 s (p<0.001). SEM surface characterization revealed that the hybrid-filled composite resin was much more affected by etching than the nano-filled. SIGNIFICANCE: Composite resins should not be seen as a group of materials having identical properties when it comes to repair. The effect of etching will depend on the composition of the filler particles.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21571031     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  13 in total

1.  Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN.

Authors:  Valeria V Gordan; Joseph L Riley; Donald C Worley; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Repair of Bulk-Fill and Nanohybrid Resin Composites: Effect of Surface Conditioning, Adhesive Promoters, and Long-Term Aging.

Authors:  Muhittin Ugurlu; Nadin Al-Haj Husain; Mutlu Özcan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  The clinical success of repaired posterior composite restorations with and without silane application.

Authors:  Muhittin Ugurlu; Fatmanur Sari
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Repair Micro-shear Bond Strength of Silica- and Zirconia-filled Composite Resins.

Authors:  Mohammad Joulaei; Mahmoud Bahari; Anahid Ahmadi; Siavash Savadi Oskoee
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2012-12-11

5.  Repair bond strength of dual-cured resin composite core buildup materials.

Authors:  Heba A El-Deeb; Radwa M Ghalab; Mai M Elsayed Akah; Enas H Mobarak
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 10.479

6.  Effect of an Extra Hydrophobic Resin Layer on Repair Shear Bond Strength of a Silorane-Based Composite Resin.

Authors:  Narmin Mohammadi; Mahmoud Bahari; Soodabeh Kimyai; Behnam Rahbani Nobar
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-12

7.  Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive.

Authors:  Pinar Altinci; Murat Mutluay; Arzu Tezvergil-Mutluay
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2017-12-12

8.  Adhesive system affects repair bond strength of resin composite.

Authors:  Ozgur Irmak; Ozge Celiksoz; Begum Yilmaz; Batu Can Yaman
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2017-10-02

9.  Shear bond strength of different surface treatments in bulk fill, microhybrid, and nanoparticle repair resins.

Authors:  Rudys Rodolfo de Jesus Tavarez; Lauber Jose Dos Santos Almeida Júnior; Tayanne Christine Gomes Guará; Izabella Santos Ribeiro; Etevaldo Matos Maia Filho; Leily Macedo Firoozmand
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2017-07-03

10.  Effects of different etching strategies on the microtensile repair bond strength of beautifil II giomer material.

Authors:  Mahmoud Bahari; Siavash Savadi-Oskoee; Soodabeh Kimyai; Ayda Savadi-Oskoee; Farhang Abbasi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.