Literature DB >> 21570802

Femoral impaction grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 540 hips.

Tony D Lamberton1, Paddy J Kenny, Sarah L Whitehouse, A John Timperley, Graham A Gie.   

Abstract

Between 1987 and 1999, 540 revision total hip arthroplasties in 487 patients were performed at our institution using the femoral impaction grafting technique with a cemented femoral stem. All patients were prospectively followed up for 2 to 15 years postoperatively with no loss to follow-up. A total of 494 hips remained successfully in situ at an average of 6.7 years. The 10-year survival rate was 98.0% (95% confidence interval, 96.2-99.8) with aseptic loosening as the end point and 84.2% (95% confidence interval, 78.5-89.9) for reoperation for any reason. Indication for surgery and the use of any kind of reinforcement significantly influenced outcome (P < .001). This is the largest known series of revision THA with femoral impaction grafting, and the results support continued use of this technique.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21570802     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  [Revision implants of the future: trends and new developments].

Authors:  S Winkler; F-X Köck; C Baier; H-R Springorum; A Beifuss; P Lechler; J Grifka; J Schaumburger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Femoral impaction grafting.

Authors:  John A Scanelli; Thomas E Brown
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-01-18

Review 3.  Management bone loss of the proximal femur in revision hip arthroplasty: Update on reconstructive options.

Authors:  Vasileios I Sakellariou; George C Babis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

4.  Novel Acetabular Cup for Revision THA Improves Hip Center of Rotation: A Radiographic Evaluation.

Authors:  Anton Khlopas; Morad Chughtai; Randa K Elmallah; David Hip-Flores; Arthur L Malkani; Steven F Harwin; Michael A Mont; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA: reliable osseointegration but frequent complications.

Authors:  Nicholas M Brown; Matthew Tetreault; Cara A Cipriano; Craig J Della Valle; Wayne Paprosky; Scott Sporer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.

Authors:  Martijn A J Te Stroet; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Revision of hip resurfacing arthroplasty with a bone-conserving short-stem implant: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Lorenz Wanke-Jellinek; Volkmar Jansson; Andreas Fottner; Farhad Mazoochian
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-08-20

8.  What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?

Authors:  Jason Verspeek; Thijs A Nijenhuis; Martijn F L Kuijpers; Wim H C Rijnen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Medium-term follow-up of 92 femoral component revisions using a third-generation cementing technique.

Authors:  Martijn A J Te Stroet; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert Van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.