BACKGROUND: Although exercise treadmill testing (ETT) is less sensitive and specific for diagnosis of coronary disease in women, little is known about gender differences in the prognostic importance of ETT variables. METHODS: We studied 9,569 consecutive patients (46.8% women) referred for ETT between July 2001 and June 2004 in a community-based system. We assessed the association between ETT variables (exercise capacity, symptoms, ST-segment deviations, heart rate recovery, and chronotropic response) and time to all-cause death and myocardial infarction (MI), adjusting for patient and stress test characteristics. Models were stratified by gender to determine the relationship between ETT variables and outcomes. RESULTS: In the entire population, exercise capacity and heart rate recovery were significantly associated with all-cause death, whereas exercise capacity, chest pain, and ST-segment deviations were significantly associated with subsequent MI. The relationship between ETT variables and outcomes were similar between men and women, except for abnormal exercise capacity, which had a significantly stronger association with death in men (men: hazard ratio [HR] 2.89 and 95% CI 1.89-4.44, women: HR 0.99 and 95% CI 0.52-1.93, and interaction P = .01), and chronotropic incompetence, which had a significantly stronger relationship with MI in women (men: HR 1.29 and 95% CI 0.74-2.20, women: HR 2.79 and 95% CI 0.94-8.27, and interaction P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Although many traditional ETT variables had similar prognostic value in both men and women, exercise capacity was more prognostically important in men, and chronotropic incompetence was more important in women. Future studies should confirm these findings in additional populations.
BACKGROUND: Although exercise treadmill testing (ETT) is less sensitive and specific for diagnosis of coronary disease in women, little is known about gender differences in the prognostic importance of ETT variables. METHODS: We studied 9,569 consecutive patients (46.8% women) referred for ETT between July 2001 and June 2004 in a community-based system. We assessed the association between ETT variables (exercise capacity, symptoms, ST-segment deviations, heart rate recovery, and chronotropic response) and time to all-cause death and myocardial infarction (MI), adjusting for patient and stress test characteristics. Models were stratified by gender to determine the relationship between ETT variables and outcomes. RESULTS: In the entire population, exercise capacity and heart rate recovery were significantly associated with all-cause death, whereas exercise capacity, chest pain, and ST-segment deviations were significantly associated with subsequent MI. The relationship between ETT variables and outcomes were similar between men and women, except for abnormal exercise capacity, which had a significantly stronger association with death in men (men: hazard ratio [HR] 2.89 and 95% CI 1.89-4.44, women: HR 0.99 and 95% CI 0.52-1.93, and interaction P = .01), and chronotropic incompetence, which had a significantly stronger relationship with MI in women (men: HR 1.29 and 95% CI 0.74-2.20, women: HR 2.79 and 95% CI 0.94-8.27, and interaction P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Although many traditional ETT variables had similar prognostic value in both men and women, exercise capacity was more prognostically important in men, and chronotropic incompetence was more important in women. Future studies should confirm these findings in additional populations.
Authors: Ali Morshedi-Meibodi; Martin G Larson; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Raymond J Gibbons; Gary J Balady; J Timothy Bricker; Bernard R Chaitman; Gerald F Fletcher; Victor F Froelicher; Daniel B Mark; Ben D McCallister; Aryan N Mooss; Michael G O'Reilly; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jonathan Myers; Manish Prakash; Victor Froelicher; Dat Do; Sara Partington; J Edwin Atwood Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martha Gulati; Dilip K Pandey; Morton F Arnsdorf; Diane S Lauderdale; Ronald A Thisted; Roxanne H Wicklund; Arfan J Al-Hani; Henry R Black Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Samia Mora; Rita F Redberg; Yadong Cui; Maura K Whiteman; Jodi A Flaws; A Richey Sharrett; Roger S Blumenthal Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-09-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: D B Mark; L Shaw; F E Harrell; M A Hlatky; K L Lee; J R Bengtson; C B McCants; R M Califf; D B Pryor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-09-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas M Maddox; Colleen Ross; P Michael Ho; Frederick A Masoudi; David Magid; Stacie L Daugherty; Pam Peterson; John S Rumsfeld Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Deepak P Vivekananthan; Eugene H Blackstone; Claire E Pothier; Michael S Lauer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Rebecca M Kappus; Sushant M Ranadive; Huimin Yan; Abbi D Lane-Cordova; Marc D Cook; Peng Sun; I Shevon Harvey; Kenneth R Wilund; Jeffrey A Woods; Bo Fernhall Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 5.027
Authors: Helmut K Lackner; Manfred G Moertl; Karin Schmid-Zalaudek; Miha Lucovnik; Elisabeth M Weiss; Vassiliki Kolovetsiou-Kreiner; Ilona Papousek Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Ricardo Quental Coutinho; Ulisses Ramos Montarroyos; Isly Maria Lucena de Barros; Maria José Bezerra Guimarães; Laura Olinda Bregieiro Fernandes Costa; Ana Kelley de Lima Medeiros; Maria de Fátima Monteiro; Moacir de Novaes Lima Ferreira; William Azem Chalela; Rodrigo Pedrosa Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Nóra Sydó; Tibor Sydó; Karina A Gonzalez Carta; Nasir Hussain; Shausha Farooq; Joseph G Murphy; Béla Merkely; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Thomas G Allison Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 5.501