Literature DB >> 18926155

The prognostic importance of abnormal heart rate recovery and chronotropic response among exercise treadmill test patients.

Thomas M Maddox1, Colleen Ross, P Michael Ho, Frederick A Masoudi, David Magid, Stacie L Daugherty, Pam Peterson, John S Rumsfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart rate recovery (HRR) and chronotropic response to exercise (CR) each have prognostic value among patients undergoing exercise treadmill testing (ETT). However, little is known about their prognostic use in combination and in addition to the Duke Treadmill Score (DTS).
METHODS: We studied 9,519 outpatients undergoing ETT between 2001 and 2004. Patients were categorized by HRR and CR. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to control for demographics, clinical history, and DTS.
RESULTS: After multivariable adjustment for DTS and other demographic and clinical variables, patients with abnormal HRR and CR had higher rates of all-cause mortality or nonfatal MI, as compared to patients with normal HRR and CR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.90, 95% CI 1.35-2.69). Addition of the HRR and CR to the DTS improved outcome prediction (c-statistic improved from 0.61 to 0.68). Low-risk DTS patients with abnormal HRR and CR had significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality or nonfatal MI (HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.55-4.32), compared to low-risk DTS patients with normal HRR and CR.
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal HRR and CR identified ETT patients with higher rates of all-cause mortality or nonfatal MI and provided additional risk stratification among low-risk DTS patients. These results support the routine incorporation of HRR and CR in ETT reporting and suggest the need to evaluate whether further testing and/or more intensive treatment of these higher risk patients can improve outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18926155     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  19 in total

1.  The year of 2008 in electrocardiology.

Authors:  Shlomo Stern
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Influence of the maximum heart rate attained during exercise testing on subsequent heart rate recovery.

Authors:  Sina Zaim; Joel Schesser; Linda S Hirsch; Ronald Rockland
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  Cardiovascular recovery from psychological and physiological challenge and risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Vanessa Panaite; Kristen Salomon; Alvin Jin; Jonathan Rottenberg
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Gender differences in the prognostic value of exercise treadmill test characteristics.

Authors:  Stacie L Daugherty; David J Magid; Jennifer R Kikla; John E Hokanson; Judith Baxter; Colleen A Ross; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Cardiovascular Response to Exercise Testing in Children and Adolescents Late After Kawasaki Disease According to Coronary Condition Upon Onset.

Authors:  Hugo Gravel; Daniel Curnier; Frédéric Dallaire; Anne Fournier; Michael Portman; Nagib Dahdah
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Improvements in heart rate recovery among women after cardiac rehabilitation completion.

Authors:  Theresa M Beckie; Jason W Beckstead; Kevin E Kip; Gerald Fletcher
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Could heart rate recovery and exercise capacity predict abnormal 99mTc-MIBI myocardial perfusion scan findings?

Authors:  Aryan Naghedi; Nasim Namiranian; Mohsen Goudarzi; Reza Nafisi Moghadam; Seid Kazem Razavi-Ratki
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2021-04-30

8.  Detection of autonomic dysfunction in hemodialysis patients using the exercise treadmill test: the role of the chronotropic index, heart rate recovery, and R-R variability.

Authors:  Maria Angela M Q Carreira; André B Nogueira; Felipe M Pena; Marcio G Kiuchi; Ronaldo C Rodrigues; Rodrigo R Rodrigues; Jorge P S Matos; Jocemir R Lugon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Heart rate recovery in the first minute at the six-minute walk test in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Sabrina Lindemberg; Sergio Chermont; Mônica Quintão; Milena Derossi; Sergio Guilhon; Sabrina Bernardez; Luana Marchese; Wolney Martins; Antônio Claudio L Nóbrega; Evandro Tinoco Mesquita
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Heart rate recovery in asymptomatic patients with Chagas disease.

Authors:  Maria Clara Noman de Alencar; Manoel Otávio da Costa Rocha; Márcia Maria de Oliveira Lima; Henrique Silveira Costa; Giovane Rodrigo Sousa; Renata de Carvalho Bicalho Carneiro; Guilherme Canabrava Rodrigues Silva; Fernando Vieira Brandão; Lucas Jordan Kreuser; Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro; Maria Carmo Pereira Nunes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.