Literature DB >> 21569564

Trends in refractive surgery at an academic center: 2007-2009.

Irene C Kuo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The United States officially entered a recession in December 2007, and it officially exited the recession in December 2009, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research. Since the economy may affect not only the volume of excimer laser refractive surgery, but also the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing surgery, our goal was to compare the characteristics of patients completing excimer laser refractive surgery and the types of procedures performed in the summer quarter in 2007 and the same quarter in 2009 at an academic center. A secondary goal was to determine whether the volume of astigmatism- or presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) has concurrently changed because like laser refractive surgery, these "premium" IOLs involve out-of-pocket costs for patients.
METHODS: Retrospective case series. Medical records were reviewed for all patients completing surgery at the Wilmer Laser Vision Center in the summer quarter of 2007 and the summer quarter of 2009. Outcome measures were the proportions of treated refractive errors, the proportion of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) vs. laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and the mean age of patients in each quarter. Chi-square test was used to compare the proportions of treated refractive errors and the proportions of procedures; two-tailed t-test to compare the mean age of patients; and two-tailed z-test to compare proportions of grouped refractive errors in 2007 vs. 2009; alpha = 0.05 for all tests. Refractive errors were grouped by the spherical equivalent of the manifest refraction and were considered "low myopia" for 6 diopters (D) of myopia or less, "high myopia" for more than 6 D, and "hyperopia" for any hyperopia. Billing data were reviewed to obtain the volume of premium IOLs.
RESULTS: Volume of laser refractive procedures decreased by at least 30%. The distribution of proportions of treated refractive errors did not change (p = 0.10). The proportion of high myopes, however, decreased (p = 0.05). The proportions of types of procedure changed, with an increase in the proportion of PRK between 2007 and 2009 (p = 0.02). The mean age of patients did not change [42.4 ± 14.4 (standard deviation) years in 2007 vs. 39.6 ± 14.5 years in 2009; p = 0.4]. Astigmatism-correcting IOL and presbyopia-correcting IOL volumes increased 15-fold and three-fold, respectively, between 2007 and 2009.
CONCLUSIONS: Volume of excimer laser refractive surgery decreased by at least 30% between 2007 and 2009. No significant change in mean age or in the distribution of refractive error was seen, although the proportion of high myopes decreased between summer quarters of 2007 and 2009. PRK gained as a proportion of total cases. Premium IOL volume increased, but still comprised a very small proportion of total IOL volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21569564      PMCID: PMC3115925          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-11-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1471-2415            Impact factor:   2.209


  6 in total

1.  The prevalence of refractive errors among adults in the United States, Western Europe, and Australia.

Authors:  John H Kempen; Paul Mitchell; Kristine E Lee; James M Tielsch; Aimee T Broman; Hugh R Taylor; M Kamran Ikram; Nathan G Congdon; Benita J O'Colmain
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04

Review 2.  Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.

Authors:  A J Shortt; B D S Allan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

3.  Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  T Oshika; S D Klyce; R A Applegate; H C Howland; M A El Danasoury
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Joshua A Schliesser; Joann C Chang; Thomas J Oberg; Mark D Mifflin; Richard Townley; Myrna K Livingston; Christopher J Kurz
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Effect of larger ablation zone and transition zone on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  M J Endl; C E Martinez; S D Klyce; M B McDonald; S J Coorpender; R A Applegate; H C Howland
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-08

6.  Flap-induced and laser-induced ocular aberrations in a two-step LASIK procedure.

Authors:  Samra Waheed; Maria Regina Chalita; Meng Xu; Ronald R Krueger
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Impact of Economic Downturn on the Surgical Volumes of Common Hand Procedures.

Authors:  Nasa Fujihara; Yuki Fujihara; Jennifer M Sterbenz; Melissa J Shauver; Ting-Ting Chung; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Monochromatic higher order aberrations in highly myopic eyes with Staphyloma.

Authors:  Santiago Delgado-Tirado; Alberto López-Miguel; Yazmin Báez-Peralta; Lucía González-Buendía; Itziar Fernández; Jorge L Alió; Miguel J Maldonado; Rosa M Coco-Martín
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Preparation and Thickness Profile of Endothelial Keratoplasty Lenticules from Donated Whole Eyes with Previous Photorefractive Keratectomy.

Authors:  Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi; Pejman Fahim; Mohsen Rahmanian; Tahereh Chamani; Bahar Kheiri; Sahar Balagholi; Mohammad Ali Javadi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

4.  Outcomes of Refractive Surgery Consultations at an Academic Center: Characteristics Associated with Proceeding (or Not Proceeding) with Surgery.

Authors:  Irene C Kuo; Benjamin Lee; Jiangxia Wang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  James A Katz; Paul M Karpecki; Alexandra Dorca; Sima Chiva-Razavi; Heather Floyd; Elizabeth Barnes; Mark Wuttke; Eric Donnenfeld
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-24

6.  Increased preference of surface ablation over laser in situ keratomileusis between 2008-2011 is correlated to risk of ecatasia.

Authors:  Elad Moisseiev; Tzahi Sela; Liza Minkev; David Varssano
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.