| Literature DB >> 21569551 |
Kamal A Amin1, Hamdy H Kamel, Mohamed A Abd Eltawab.
Abstract
AIMS: This study aimed to examine the effect of high fat diet (HFD) to modulate brain dysfunction, and understand the linkages between obesity, metabolic disturbances and the brain oxidative stress (BOS) dysfunction and modulation with hydroxyl citric acid of G. Cambogia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21569551 PMCID: PMC3104359 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-74
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Effect of initial, final and gain of body weight (gm) in the different groups of experiment. In this study, final BW, BW gains (Figure 1) was significantly increased in HFD compared with control group. G. Cambogia treatment result in decrease BW, energy intake and adipose tissues in relation to HFD group.
Figure 2Means of total energy intake k/calory in total period of experiment (3 months) in different groups of rats. Figure (2) illustrated significant increase in energy intake in HFD compared with control. Values are statistically analyzed by one way ANOVA. Column have different letters indicate significant variation at (P ≤ 0.05), while the same letters indicate non significant variation.
Changes in blood metabolic parameters CK, γGT, α-amylase, BCHE activity, Uric acid, abdominal fat and glucose level in control, HFD and HFD+G in rat.
| Control | HFD | HFD+ G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 70.0 ± 4.2a | 63.0 ± 2.2a | 69.0 ± 4.8a | |
| 30.0 ± 2.7a | 65.0 ± 6.2b | 33.0 ± 3.5a | |
| 93.0 ± 4.8a | 150.0 ± 13b | 110.0 ± 9.6c | |
| 260 ± 22a | 500.0 ± 39b | 300.0 ± 21a | |
| 3.2 ± 0.13a | 6.3 ± 0.32b | 4.1 ± 0.16a | |
| 4.98 ± 0.61a | 9.2 ± 0.71b | 5.0 ± 0.64c | |
| 59.0 ± 1.6a | 111.0 ± 4.1b | 91.0 ± 3.9c | |
Table (1) showed decreased activity of CK, while significant increase in γGT, α-amylase, BCHE activities. Moreover significant increase in abdominal adipose tissue, uric acid level increases significantly and hyperglycemia occur in HFD group relative to control. Some of these changes were significantly rearranged in HFD+G compared with HFD group ≤ 0.05.
Each value is the mean ± SEM. Means have different superscript letters indicate significant variation at (P ≤ 0.05), while the same letters indicate non significant variation
Figure 3Effect of lipid profile TC, TG, LDL and HDL (gm/dl) in the different groups of experiment. Figure (3) demonstrated significant increase in serum lipid profile TC, TG and LDL level due to ingestion of HFD compared with control while, G. Cambogia extract improve these changes.
Means of brain catalase, MDA and Nitric oxide levels in different groups of rats (3 months).
| Control | HFD | HFD+G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 ± 0.69a | 12.2 ± 0.63b | 10.3 ± 0.32b | |
| 2.6 ± 0.24a | 5.7 ± 0.31b | 4.9 ± 0.61c | |
| 1.3 ± 0.08a | 0.8 ± 0.11b | ||
In brain tissues, MDA level and catalase activities were significantly increased in HFD compared with control group and treatment with G. Cambogia ameliorated these changes (Table 2).
Values are statically analyzed by one way ANOVA and reported as means ± SEM.
Means have different letters indicate significant variation at (P ≤ 0.05), while the same letters indicate non significant variation
Correlation coeffecient between parameters in different groups of rats.
| BChE | TG | TC | Glucose | Abdomin Fat | Final BW | Brain Catalase | Brain NO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ---- | P < 0.033 | P < 0.001 | NS | P < 0.007 | NS | NS | P < 0.04 | |
| ----- | ____ | P < 0.048 | P < 0.02 | P < 0.021 | ------- | P < 0.04 | P < 0.004 | |
| NS | P < 0.05 | NS | P < 0.007 | NS | P < 0.03 | P < 0.005 | P < 0.05 | |
| NS | ----- | NS | P < 0.006 | NS | P < 0.03 | ____ | P < 0.04 | |
| ------ | ------ | P < 0.05 | P < 0.024 | P < 0.02 | NS | P < 0.05 | ____ | |
| NS | P < 0.008 | NS | P < 0.013 | P < 0.035 | ----- | P < 0.03 | P < 0.002 | |
r = Value of correlation coefficient. P ≤ 0.05 indicate significant variation.
Significant positive correlation was detected between BChE activity and serum TG level (P < 0.03 and r = 0.96), TC (P < 0.001 and r = 0.99) and abdominal fat weight (P < 0.007 and r = 0.99), while serum BChE activity had a negative correlation with Brain NO concentration (P < 0.04 and r = -0.96) (Table 3).
Brain MDA positively correlated with TG (P < 0.05 and r = 0.95), blood glucose (P < 0.007 and r = 0.99) and final BW (P < 0.03 and r = 0.91) while, negatively correlated with NO (P < 0.05 and r = -0.95). There were negative correlation between blood glucose and brain NO (P < 0.024 and r = -0.9) (Table 3) in rats group. Also the data showed negative correlation between brain NO and MDA levels (P = 0.05 and r = -0.95), (Table 3).