PURPOSE: To directly compare perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of laparoscopic renal cryoablation and open partial nephrectomy using a matched pair analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 41 patients who underwent laparoscopic cryoablation for an incidental, solid clinical T(1a)N(0)M(0) renal tumor were matched with 82 patients who received partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia, using optimal matching based on propensity scores, which were created on the basis of preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomic classification of renal tumors (PADUA) score, preoperative glomerular filtration rate, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, and sex. Median follow-up was 33.6 months. RESULTS: No differences in the overall incidence of complications (cryoablation, 20%; partial nephrectomy, 17%; P=0.739) and grade of complications (P=0.424) were observed. After cryoablation, local recurrence developed in four patients with renal-cell carcinoma (n=35) after a median duration of 14 months (range 6-18 mos), but none after partial nephrectomy. The 3-year recurrence-free survival probabilities after laparoscopic renal cryoablation vs open partial nephrectomy were 83% vs 100%, respectively (P=0.015). The average decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate during follow-up was 7.8±3.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) after laparoscopic cryoablation and 9.8±2.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2) after open partial nephrectomy, which was not statistically significant (P=0.602). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative complications and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic cryoablation and open partial nephrectomy are similar; however, laparoscopic cryoablation confers a substantially higher local recurrence risk of about 17% after 3 years. Therefore, laparoscopic renal cryoablation should be reserved for high-risk patients with decreased life expectancy. Careful patient counseling is advocated. Study limitations include the small sample size, the lack of randomization, and the short follow-up.
PURPOSE: To directly compare perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of laparoscopic renal cryoablation and open partial nephrectomy using a matched pair analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 41 patients who underwent laparoscopic cryoablation for an incidental, solid clinical T(1a)N(0)M(0) renal tumor were matched with 82 patients who received partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia, using optimal matching based on propensity scores, which were created on the basis of preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomic classification of renal tumors (PADUA) score, preoperative glomerular filtration rate, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, and sex. Median follow-up was 33.6 months. RESULTS: No differences in the overall incidence of complications (cryoablation, 20%; partial nephrectomy, 17%; P=0.739) and grade of complications (P=0.424) were observed. After cryoablation, local recurrence developed in four patients with renal-cell carcinoma (n=35) after a median duration of 14 months (range 6-18 mos), but none after partial nephrectomy. The 3-year recurrence-free survival probabilities after laparoscopic renal cryoablation vs open partial nephrectomy were 83% vs 100%, respectively (P=0.015). The average decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate during follow-up was 7.8±3.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) after laparoscopic cryoablation and 9.8±2.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2) after open partial nephrectomy, which was not statistically significant (P=0.602). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative complications and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic cryoablation and open partial nephrectomy are similar; however, laparoscopic cryoablation confers a substantially higher local recurrence risk of about 17% after 3 years. Therefore, laparoscopic renal cryoablation should be reserved for high-risk patients with decreased life expectancy. Careful patient counseling is advocated. Study limitations include the small sample size, the lack of randomization, and the short follow-up.
Authors: Hiten D Patel; Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael H Johnson; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Mohamad E Allaf; Eric B Bass; Stephen M Sozio Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael H Johnson; Hiten D Patel; Stephen M Sozio; Ritu Sharma; Emmanuel Iyoha; Eric B Bass; Mohamad E Allaf Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Christopher J Long; Daniel J Canter; Marc C Smaldone; Tianyu Li; Jay Simhan; Boris Rozenfeld; Ervin Teper; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Rosalia Viterbo; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov Journal: Can J Urol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.344
Authors: Johannes Uhlig; Arne Strauss; Gerta Rücker; Ali Seif Amir Hosseini; Joachim Lotz; Lutz Trojan; Hyun S Kim; Annemarie Uhlig Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: J J Wendler; B Friebe; D Baumunk; A Blana; T Franiel; R Ganzer; B Hadaschik; T Henkel; K U Köhrmann; J Köllermann; T Kuru; S Machtens; A Roosen; G Salomon; H P Schlemmer; L Sentker; U Witzsch; U B Liehr; J Ricke; M Schostak Journal: Urologe A Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Tobias Klatte; Nils Kroeger; Uwe Zimmermann; Martin Burchardt; Arie S Belldegrun; Allan J Pantuck Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Aaron C Weinberg; Solomon L Woldu; Timothy Wen; Christopher M Deibert; Ruslan Korets; Ketan K Badani Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Malte W Vetterlein; Tarun Jindal; Andreas Becker; Marc Regier; Luis A Kluth; Derya Tilki; Felix K-H Chun Journal: Investig Clin Urol Date: 2016-07-05