Literature DB >> 21568649

Minimum 5-year follow-up results of skipped pedicle screw fixation for flexible idiopathic scoliosis.

Chang Ju Hwang1, Choon-Ki Lee, Bong-Soon Chang, Min-Seok Kim, Jin S Yeom, Jin-Man Choi.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to evaluate after more than 5 years the outcome of surgical treatment for flexible idiopathic scoliosis using skipped pedicle screw fixation.
METHODS: For patients with spine curves < 90° and flexibility > 20%, pedicle screws had been inserted into every other segment on the corrective side and 2-4 screws per curve had been inserted on the supportive side. The authors analyzed the results in 57 patients, including the correction rate of coronal curvature and rotational deformity, correction loss, sagittal balance, complications, blood loss, operation time, and implant costs.
RESULTS: The mean Cobb angle was 54° preoperatively and 17° immediately after surgery (69% correction). At the last follow-up, the mean Cobb angle was 18° (2% correction loss). Rotation of the apical vertebra was corrected by 50% on average and showed only a 6% correction loss at the last follow-up. None of the patients had problems in maintaining sagittal balance. An adding-on phenomenon was detected in 4 patients (7%). Twelve of 14 patients with coronal decompensation showed improvement after surgery, whereas postoperative decompensation developed in 3 patients. Four patients had implant failures, and 4 had postoperative infections. The mean blood loss during surgery was 832 ml, and the mean operation time was 167 minutes. Compared with conventional methods, the authors' method used up to 48% fewer screws.
CONCLUSIONS: Skipped pedicle screw fixation of flexible idiopathic scoliosis showed satisfactory results. This method has several advantages, including reduced blood loss, shorter operation time, and reduced cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568649     DOI: 10.3171/2011.4.SPINE10321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  16 in total

1.  A randomized double-blinded clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel superelastic nickel-titanium spinal rod in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Kelvin Yeung; Michael To; Keith Dip Kei Luk; Kenneth Man-Chee Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes using pedicle screw only constructs in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven W Hwang; Amer F Samdani; Michelle Marks; Tracy Bastrom; Hitesh Garg; Baron Lonner; James T Bennett; Joshua Pahys; Suken Shah; Firoz Miyanji; Harry Shufflebarger; Peter Newton; Randal Betz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Use of a novel corrective device for correction of deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Iain Feeley; Andrew Hughes; Noelle Cassidy; Connor Green
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Do vertebral derotation techniques offer better outcomes compared to traditional methods in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Paul R P Rushton; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Influence of implant density and flexibility index on curve correction after scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  J M Wolfram; V A Kristen; J Cip; C M Bach
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  Does Implant Density Impact Three-Dimensional Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with Lenke 1 and 2 Curves Treated by Posterior Spinal Fusion without Ponte Osteotomies?

Authors:  Thamrong Lertudomphonwanit; Chirag A Berry; Viral V Jain; Peter F Sturm
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-05-10

7.  Low-Density Pedicle Screw Constructs for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evaluation of Effectiveness and Cost.

Authors:  Oliver O Tannous; Kelly E Banagan; Eric J Belin; Ehsan Jazini; Tristan B Weir; Steven C Ludwig; Daniel E Gelb
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-10-05

8.  Significant variability in surgeons' preferred correction maneuvers and instrumentation strategies when planning adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Franck Le Navéaux; A Noelle Larson; Hubert Labelle; Carl-Eric Aubin
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2018-10-07

9.  COMPARISON OF IMPLANT DENSITY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LENKE 1B AND 1C ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS.

Authors:  Bekir Eray Kilinc; Dong Phuong Tran; Charles Johnston
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

10.  Utilization of Offset Iliac Connectors as Anchoring Sites in Severe Rigid Scoliosis: New Technique.

Authors:  Ahmed Barakat; Yasser El Mansy; Hesham El Saghir
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.