Literature DB >> 21568358

Intravenous esomeprazole: a pharmacoeconomic profile of its use in the prevention of recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding.

Gillian M Keating1.   

Abstract

Intravenous esomeprazole (Nexium®) is approved in Europe for the prevention of rebleeding following therapeutic endoscopy for acute bleeding gastric or duodenal ulcers. In a pivotal clinical trial, patients with peptic ulcer bleeding and high-risk stigmata who received intravenous esomeprazole for 72 hours following endoscopic haemostatic therapy were significantly less likely than those receiving intravenous placebo to experience recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding at days 3, 7 and 30. In addition, the need for repeat endoscopic haemostatic therapy, the total amount of blood transfused and the number of additional hospital days required because of rebleeding were significantly lower in intravenous esomeprazole recipients than in intravenous placebo recipients. All patients received oral esomeprazole for 27 days following intravenous study drug administration. Intravenous esomeprazole was generally well tolerated in the pivotal trial, with infusion-site reactions being among the most commonly reported adverse events. Two pharmacoeconomic analyses conducted from a healthcare payer perspective used decision-tree models with 30-day time horizons to examine the cost effectiveness and cost utility of intravenous esomeprazole in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers who had undergone endoscopic haemostatic therapy. With regard to the incremental cost per bleed averted, intravenous esomeprazole was predicted to be dominant in Spain and cost effective in Sweden and the US compared with no intravenous esomeprazole. Efficacy results and resource utilization data from the pivotal clinical trial were inputted into this model, and the results of the analysis were generally robust to plausible variations in key variables. In the cost-utility analysis, which was conducted in the UK and is available as an abstract and poster, esomeprazole was considered to be the most cost-effective treatment alternative, compared with omeprazole or pantoprazole. For this analysis, clinical outcomes data were obtained from a systematic review and mixed treatment comparison (given the absence of head-to-head trial data), and utility values were proxied from the literature. In conclusion, intravenous esomeprazole prevents peptic ulcer rebleeding in patients who have undergone endoscopic haemostatic therapy. Pharmacoeconomic analyses support the use of intravenous esomeprazole following endoscopic haemostatic therapy in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding and high-risk stigmata.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21568358     DOI: 10.2165/11207430-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  29 in total

Review 1.  Treatment with proton pump inhibitors in acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed S Khuroo; Mehnaaz S Khuroo; Karim L C Farahat; Ingvar E Kagevi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 2.  Bleeding peptic ulcer.

Authors:  L Laine; W L Peterson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effect of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.

Authors:  J Y Lau; J J Sung; K K Lee; M Y Yung; S K Wong; J C Wu; F K Chan; E K Ng; J H You; C W Lee; A C Chan; S C Chung
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A prospective randomized comparative trial showing that omeprazole prevents rebleeding in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer after successful endoscopic therapy.

Authors:  H J Lin; W C Lo; F Y Lee; C L Perng; G Y Tseng
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-01-12

5.  Cost effectiveness of high-dose intravenous esomeprazole for peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Viviane Adam; Joseph J Y Sung; Ernst J Kuipers; Joachim Mössner; Dennis Jensen; Robert Stuart; James Y Lau; Emma Nauclér; Jan Kilhamn; Helena Granstedt; Bengt Liljas; Tore Lind
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Trends in management and outcomes of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: 1993-2003.

Authors:  Laura E Targownik; Alice Nabalamba
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Marc Bardou; Ernst J Kuipers; Joseph Sung; Richard H Hunt; Myriam Martel; Paul Sinclair
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Systematic reviews of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  G I Leontiadis; A Sreedharan; S Dorward; P Barton; B Delaney; C W Howden; M Orhewere; J Gisbert; V K Sharma; A Rostom; P Moayyedi; D Forman
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in central Greece: the role of clinical and endoscopic variables in bleeding outcome.

Authors:  A N Kapsoritakis; E A Ntounas; E A Makrigiannis; E A Ntouna; V D Lotis; A K Psychos; G A Paroutoglou; A M Kapetanakis; S P Potamianos
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Marc Bardou; John K Marshall
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.