Literature DB >> 2156792

Induction of beta-lactamase and methicillin resistance in unusual strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

J M Boyce1, A A Medeiros, E F Papa, C J O'Gara.   

Abstract

Two unusual, heterogeneously-resistant, strains of Staphylococcus aureus appeared resistant to oxacillin, but susceptible to methicillin by disc diffusion methods. In agar dilution tests, both strains were oxacillin-resistant. One was susceptible to methicillin, and the other gave a paradoxical reaction, with growth only on plates containing low (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/l) and high (32 and 64 mg/l) concentrations of antibiotic. Induction of methicillin resistance was tested by inoculating each strain on to agar plates containing an inhibitory concentration of methicillin (8 mg/l), and then placing discs containing inducers (oxacillin, nafcillin, methicillin and CBAP [2-(2'-carboxyphenyl) benzoyl-6-aminopenicillanic acid]) on the agar surface. Colonies grew only around discs containing effective inducers. Oxacillin and CBAP were much more potent inducers of methicillin resistance and beta-lactamase than was nafcillin or methicillin. These data suggest that the mechanism that regulates induction of the low-affinity penicillin binding protein (PBP-2') may be altered in these strains. Similar mechanisms appear to induce both beta-lactamase and methicillin resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2156792     DOI: 10.1093/jac/25.1.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  8 in total

1.  Correlation between regulation of mecA transcription and expression of methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  C Ryffel; F H Kayser; B Berger-Bächi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Inducibly cefoxitin-resistant Macrococcus-like organism falsely identified as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on CHROMagar with oxacillin.

Authors:  Joseph E Rubin; Manuel Chirino-Trejo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Failure of routine susceptibility tests to detect imipenem resistance among strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Boyce; E Papa; R Dickenson; A A Medeiros
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Effects of ceftobiprole and oxacillin on mecA expression in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates.

Authors:  Wenchi Shang; Todd A Davies; Robert K Flamm; Karen Bush
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Roles of lytic transglycosylases in biofilm formation and β-lactam resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Anne-Aurelie Lopes; Yutaka Yoshii; Satomi Yamada; Mari Nagakura; Yuki Kinjo; Yoshimitsu Mizunoe; Ken-Ichi Okuda
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Altered production of penicillin-binding protein 2a can affect phenotypic expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C J Hackbarth; C Miick; H F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Suppression of methicillin resistance in a mecA-containing pre-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain is caused by the mecI-mediated repression of PBP 2' production.

Authors:  K Kuwahara-Arai; N Kondo; S Hori; E Tateda-Suzuki; K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications.

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 26.132

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.