Literature DB >> 21567662

Exploring commonalities across participants in the neural representation of objects.

Svetlana V Shinkareva1, Vicente L Malave, Marcel Adam Just, Tom M Mitchell.   

Abstract

The question of whether the neural encodings of objects are similar across different people is one of the key questions in cognitive neuroscience. This article examines the commonalities in the internal representation of objects, as measured with fMRI, across individuals in two complementary ways. First, we examine the commonalities in the internal representation of objects across people at the level of interobject distances, derived from whole brain fMRI data, and second, at the level of spatially localized anatomical brain regions that contain sufficient information for identification of object categories, without making the assumption that their voxel patterns are spatially matched in a common space. We examine the commonalities in internal representation of objects on 3T fMRI data collected while participants viewed line drawings depicting various tools and dwellings. This exploratory study revealed the extent to which the representation of individual concepts, and their mutual similarity, is shared across participants.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21567662      PMCID: PMC6870121          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  40 in total

1.  Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.

Authors:  N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming.

Authors:  P Vuilleumier; R N Henson; J Driver; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Group analysis in functional neuroimaging: selecting subjects using similarity measures.

Authors:  Ferath Kherif; Jean-Baptiste Poline; Sébastien Mériaux; Habib Benali; Guillaume Flandin; Matthew Brett
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Where bottom-up meets top-down: neuronal interactions during perception and imagery.

Authors:  Andrea Mechelli; Cathy J Price; Karl J Friston; Alumit Ishai
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Sean M Polyn; Greg J Detre; James V Haxby
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans.

Authors:  John-Dylan Haynes; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Information-based functional brain mapping.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Rainer Goebel; Peter Bandettini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Prediction and interpretation of distributed neural activity with sparse models.

Authors:  Melissa K Carroll; Guillermo A Cecchi; Irina Rish; Rahul Garg; A Ravishankar Rao
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Cerebral cortical mechanisms of copying geometrical shapes: a multidimensional scaling analysis of fMRI patterns of activation.

Authors:  Charidimos Tzagarakis; Trenton A Jerde; Scott M Lewis; Kâmil Uğurbil; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A neurosemantic theory of concrete noun representation based on the underlying brain codes.

Authors:  Marcel Adam Just; Vladimir L Cherkassky; Sandesh Aryal; Tom M Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Similarity of fMRI activity patterns in left perirhinal cortex reflects semantic similarity between words.

Authors:  Rose Bruffaerts; Patrick Dupont; Ronald Peeters; Simon De Deyne; Gerrit Storms; Rik Vandenberghe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Monitoring the growth of the neural representations of new animal concepts.

Authors:  Andrew James Bauer; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A mathematical theory of semantic development in deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andrew M Saxe; James L McClelland; Surya Ganguli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Decoding the representation of numerical values from brain activation patterns.

Authors:  Saudamini Roy Damarla; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Modality-independent representations of small quantities based on brain activation patterns.

Authors:  Saudamini Roy Damarla; Vladimir L Cherkassky; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Decoding abstract and concrete concept representations based on single-trial fMRI data.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Laura B Baucom; Svetlana V Shinkareva
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Representations of modality-specific affective processing for visual and auditory stimuli derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Svetlana V Shinkareva; Jing Wang; Jongwan Kim; Matthew J Facciani; Laura B Baucom; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Multiple Subject Barycentric Discriminant Analysis (MUSUBADA): how to assign scans to categories without using spatial normalization.

Authors:  Hervé Abdi; Lynne J Williams; Andrew C Connolly; M Ida Gobbini; Joseph P Dunlop; James V Haxby
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Unique semantic space in the brain of each beholder predicts perceived similarity.

Authors:  Ian Charest; Rogier A Kievit; Taylor W Schmitz; Diana Deca; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Examining similarity structure: multidimensional scaling and related approaches in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Svetlana V Shinkareva; Jing Wang; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.