Literature DB >> 21567278

Physicians' perception of CPOE implementation.

Benoît Allenet1, Pierrick Bedouch, Stéphanie Bourget, Magalie Baudrant, Luc Foroni, Jean Calop, Jean-Luc Bosson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify perceptions held by physicians of the benefits of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and factors influencing its successful implementation in the context of the increased presence of a clinical pharmacist on ward.
SETTING: A 2000-bed University Hospital.
METHOD: A cross-section opinion survey was conducted of all permanent physicians of the hospital to determine their perception on the benefits, or otherwise, of CPOE. Questionnaires, built upon the analysis of 10 preliminary semi-structured interviews with physicians, were sent to physicians by electronic and paper mail. It comprised three sections with a 4 level Likert scale: general perception of CPOE benefits (items 1.1-1.8); opinion on the introduction of the CPOE system in the hospital (item 2); opinion on the presence of a pharmacist on ward (item 3). A fourth section recorded the respondent's profile. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Level of agreement on the items describing the general perception of CPOE benefits; opinion on the introduction of a CPOE system in the hospital; and opinion on the pharmacist's presence on ward. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted on sections one and two. Analysis of this PCA representation in terms of the respondents' profile was performed.
RESULTS: One hundred and one physicians (18%) participated in the survey. Most (83%) physicians favoured the implementation of a CPOE (item 2). Among the advantages of CPOE, the greatest agreement concerned items related to safety and regulatory issues (from 80 to 76% agreement). Other items related to management issues were perceived as less tangible benefits (from 50 to 67% agreement). The increased presence of a pharmacist on the ward was supported by 94% of physicians. The PCA representation using profile items produced a 2-factor solution, accounting for 68% of the variance, with former experience of collaboration with a pharmacist (P = 0.002) and senior physician status (P = 0.013) positively influencing the perception of the CPOE.
CONCLUSION: Endorsement by senior physicians and the presence of a clinical pharmacist on ward promote a positive attitude towards CPOE and facilitate its implementation.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21567278     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-011-9521-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  41 in total

1.  A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. 1995.

Authors:  Y Donchin; D Gopher; M Olin; Y Badihi; M Biesky; C L Sprung; R Pizov; S Cotev
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

2.  Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Hagop S Mekhjian; Rajee R Kumar; Lynn Kuehn; Thomas D Bentley; Phyllis Teater; Andrew Thomas; Beth Payne; Asif Ahmad
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Organizational considerations for the implementation of a computerized physician order entry.

Authors:  Sylvia Pelayo; Marie-Catherine Beuscart-Zephir
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2010

4.  Effects of implementing computerized practitioner order entry and nursing documentation on nursing workflow in an emergency department.

Authors:  Gerald A Banet; Donna B Jeffe; Jennifer A Williams; Phillip V Asaro
Journal:  J Healthc Inf Manag       Date:  2006

Review 5.  The impact of computerized physician medication order entry in hospitalized patients--a systematic review.

Authors:  Saeid Eslami; Nicolette F de Keizer; Ameen Abu-Hanna
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Assessment of clinical pharmacists' interventions in French hospitals: results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Pierrick Bedouch; Bruno Charpiat; Ornella Conort; François-Xavier Rose; Laurence Escofier; Michel Juste; Renaud Roubille; Benoît Allenet
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 7.  Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art.

Authors:  D F Sittig; W W Stead
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education.

Authors:  T A Massaro
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Contrasting views of physicians and nurses about an inpatient computer-based provider order-entry system.

Authors:  M Weiner; T Gress; D R Thiemann; M Jenckes; S L Reel; S F Mandell; E B Bass
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors.

Authors:  Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does Computerized Physician Order Entry Benefit from Dynamic Structured Data Entry? A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Authors:  George Linn; Yung-Hsiang Ying; Koyin Chang
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Information and Communication Technologies in Lung Transplantation: Perception of Patients and Medical Teams.

Authors:  Sébastien Chanoine; Christelle Roch; Léa Liaigre; Matthieu Roustit; Céline Genty; Elisa Vitale; Jean-Luc Bosson; Christophe Pison; Benoît Allenet; Pierrick Bedouch
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.