| Literature DB >> 21566184 |
Robert E Blankenship1, David M Tiede, James Barber, Gary W Brudvig, Graham Fleming, Maria Ghirardi, M R Gunner, Wolfgang Junge, David M Kramer, Anastasios Melis, Thomas A Moore, Christopher C Moser, Daniel G Nocera, Arthur J Nozik, Donald R Ort, William W Parson, Roger C Prince, Richard T Sayre.
Abstract
Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies is not a simple issue. Although both processes harvest the energy in sunlight, they operate in distinctly different ways and produce different types of products: biomass or chemical fuels in the case of natural photosynthesis and nonstored electrical current in the case of photovoltaics. In order to find common ground for evaluating energy-conversion efficiency, we compare natural photosynthesis with present technologies for photovoltaic-driven electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen. Photovoltaic-driven electrolysis is the more efficient process when measured on an annual basis, yet short-term yields for photosynthetic conversion under optimal conditions come within a factor of 2 or 3 of the photovoltaic benchmark. We consider opportunities in which the frontiers of synthetic biology might be used to enhance natural photosynthesis for improved solar energy conversion efficiency.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21566184 DOI: 10.1126/science.1200165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN: 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728