Literature DB >> 21565735

Prognostic value of CT angiography for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain from the emergency department: 2-year outcomes of the ROMICAT trial.

Christopher L Schlett1, Dahlia Banerji, Emily Siegel, Fabian Bamberg, Sam J Lehman, Maros Ferencik, Thomas J Brady, John T Nagurney, Udo Hoffmann, Quynh A Truong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the 2-year prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography (CT) for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain.
BACKGROUND: CT has high potential for early triage of acute chest pain patients. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the prognostic value of CT in this ED cohort.
METHODS: We followed 368 patients from the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial (age 53 ± 12 years; 61% male) who presented to the ED with acute chest pain, negative initial troponin, and a nonischemic electrocardiogram for 2 years. Contrast-enhanced 64-slice CT was obtained during index hospitalization, and caregivers and patients remained blinded to the results. CT was assessed for the presence of plaque, stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing), and left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA). The primary endpoint was MACE, defined as composite cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization.
RESULTS: Follow-up was completed in 333 patients (90.5%) with a median follow-up period of 23 months. At the end of the follow-up period, 25 patients (6.8%) experienced 35 MACE (no cardiac deaths, 12 myocardial infarctions, and 23 revascularizations). Cumulative probability of 2-year MACE increased across CT strata for coronary artery disease (CAD) (no CAD 0%; nonobstructive CAD 4.6%; obstructive CAD 30.3%; log-rank p < 0.0001) and across combined CT strata for CAD and RWMA (no stenosis or RWMA 0.9%; 1 feature-either RWMA [15.0%] or stenosis [10.1%], both stenosis and RWMA 62.4%; log-rank p < 0.0001). The c statistic for predicting MACE was 0.61 for clinical Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction risk score and improved to 0.84 by adding CT CAD data and improved further to 0.91 by adding RWMA (both p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: CT coronary and functional features predict MACE and have incremental prognostic value beyond clinical risk score in ED patients with acute chest pain. The absence of CAD on CT provides a 2-year MACE-free warranty period, whereas coronary stenosis with RWMA is associated with the highest risk of MACE.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21565735      PMCID: PMC3220274          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  39 in total

1.  Burden of disease--implications for future research.

Authors:  C M Michaud; C J Murray; B R Bloom
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making.

Authors:  E M Antman; M Cohen; P J Bernink; C H McCabe; T Horacek; G Papuchis; B Mautner; R Corbalan; D Radley; E Braunwald
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-08-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience.

Authors:  Michael Lell; Mohamed Marwan; Tiziano Schepis; Tobias Pflederer; Katharina Anders; Thomas Flohr; Thomas Allmendinger; Willi Kalender; Dirk Ertel; Carsten Thierfelder; Axel Kuettner; Dieter Ropers; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Incremental diagnostic value of regional left ventricular function over coronary assessment by cardiac computed tomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain: from the ROMICAT trial.

Authors:  Sujith K Seneviratne; Quynh A Truong; Fabian Bamberg; Ian S Rogers; Michael D Shapiro; Christopher L Schlett; Claudia U Chae; Ricardo Cury; Suhny Abbara; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Benjamin J W Chow; George A Wells; Li Chen; Yeung Yam; Paul Galiwango; Arun Abraham; Tej Sheth; Carole Dennie; Rob S Beanlands; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Incremental prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Vincenzo Russo; Andrea Zavalloni; Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani; Katia Buttazzi; Valentina Gostoli; Simone Bartolini; Rossella Fattori
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Incremental prognostic significance of left ventricular dysfunction to coronary artery disease detection by 64-detector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for the prediction of all-cause mortality: results from a two-centre study of 5330 patients.

Authors:  James K Min; Fay Y Lin; Allison M Dunning; Augustin Delago; John Egan; Leslee J Shaw; Daniel S Berman; Tracy Q Callister
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Triage of patients with acute chest pain and possible cardiac ischemia: the elusive search for diagnostic perfection.

Authors:  Lee Goldman; Ajay J Kirtane
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The disposition decision on emergency department patients with chest pain is affected by the results of multi-detector computed axial tomography scan of the coronary arteries.

Authors:  John T Nagurney; Fabian Bamberg; John H Nichols; Keith Marill; David F M Brown; David A Peak; N Stuart Harris; Stewart Worrell; Blair Parry; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.484

View more
  52 in total

1.  Assessing risk in acute chest pain: The value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department.

Authors:  Faisal Nabi; Su Min Chang; Jiaqiong Xu; Elizabeth Gigliotti; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Assessment of coronary heart disease by CT angiography: current and evolving applications.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Interobserver agreement for the detection of atherosclerotic plaque in coronary CT angiography: comparison of two low-dose image acquisition protocols with standard retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruction.

Authors:  Annika Schuhbäck; Mohamed Marwan; Sören Gauss; Gerd Muschiol; Dieter Ropers; Christian Schneider; Michael Lell; Johannes Rixe; Christian Hamm; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Prognostic utility of coronary computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Yuka Otaki; Daniel S Berman; James K Min
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-04-12

Review 6.  New insights from major prospective cohort studies with cardiac CT.

Authors:  Sumbal A Janjua; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER.

Authors:  Erica Maffei; Sara Seitun; Andrea I Guaricci; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Cost and resource utilization associated with use of computed tomography to evaluate chest pain in the emergency department: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) study.

Authors:  Edward Hulten; Alexander Goehler; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Fabian Bamberg; Christopher L Schlett; Quynh A Truong; John Nichols; Khurram Nasir; Ian S Rogers; Scott G Gazelle; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-10

9.  Osteogenic monocytes within the coronary circulation and their association with plaque vulnerability in patients with early atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Julia Collin; Mario Gössl; Yoshiki Matsuo; Rebecca R Cilluffo; Andreas J Flammer; Darrell Loeffler; Ryan J Lennon; Robert D Simari; Daniel B Spoon; Raimund Erbel; Lilach O Lerman; Sundeep Khosla; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Comparison of traditional cardiovascular risk models and coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by computed tomography for prediction of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Maros Ferencik; Christopher L Schlett; Fabian Bamberg; Quynh A Truong; John H Nichols; Antonio J Pena; Michael D Shapiro; Ian S Rogers; Sujith Seneviratne; Blair Alden Parry; Ricardo C Cury; Thomas J Brady; David F Brown; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.