Literature DB >> 21564260

Strategic adaptation to performance objectives in a dual-task setting.

Christian P Janssen1, Duncan P Brumby.   

Abstract

How do people interleave attention when multitasking? One dominant account is that the completion of a subtask serves as a cue to switch tasks. But what happens if switching solely at subtask boundaries led to poor performance? We report a study in which participants manually dialed a UK-style telephone number while driving a simulated vehicle. If the driver were to exclusively return his or her attention to driving after completing a subtask (i.e., using the single break in the xxxxx-xxxxxx representational structure of the number), then we would expect to see a relatively poor driving performance. In contrast, our results show that drivers choose to return attention to steering control before the natural subtask boundary. A computational modeling analysis shows that drivers had to adopt this strategy to meet the required performance objective of maintaining an acceptable lateral position in the road while dialing. Taken together these results support the idea that people can strategically control the allocation of attention in multitask settings to meet specific performance criteria.
Copyright © 2010 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21564260     DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01124.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  10 in total

1.  Multitasking as a choice: a perspective.

Authors:  Laura Broeker; Roman Liepelt; Edita Poljac; Stefan Künzell; Harald Ewolds; Rita F de Oliveira; Markus Raab
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-10-30

2.  Distracted driving in elderly and middle-aged drivers.

Authors:  Kelsey R Thompson; Amy M Johnson; Jamie L Emerson; Jeffrey D Dawson; Erwin R Boer; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2011-10-24

Review 3.  Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alva O Ferdinand; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Flight-deck Surface Trajectory-Based Operations (STBO).

Authors:  David C Foyle; Becky L Hooey; Deborah L Bakowski; Christina L Kunkle
Journal:  Int J Aviat Psychol       Date:  2016-02-02

5.  Naturalistic distraction and driving safety in older drivers.

Authors:  Nazan Aksan; Jeffrey D Dawson; Jamie L Emerson; Lixi Yu; Ergun Y Uc; Steven W Anderson; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Strategic Adaptation to Task Characteristics, Incentives, and Individual Differences in Dual-Tasking.

Authors:  Christian P Janssen; Duncan P Brumby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Strategic predictors of performance in a divided attention task.

Authors:  Róbert Adrian Rill; Kinga Bettina Faragó; András Lőrincz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Dividing Attention Between Tasks: Testing Whether Explicit Payoff Functions Elicit Optimal Dual-Task Performance.

Authors:  George D Farmer; Christian P Janssen; Anh T Nguyen; Duncan P Brumby
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-06-27

9.  Attention control in a demanding dynamic time-sharing environment: An eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Jaakko Kulomäki; Lauri Oksama; Esa Rantanen; Jukka Hyönä
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Individual differences in skill acquisition and transfer assessed by dual task training performance and brain activity.

Authors:  Pratusha Reddy; Patricia A Shewokis; Kurtulus Izzetoglu
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2022-04-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.