PURPOSE: To compare the hippocampal volumes in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy controls, obtained by applying different segmentation methods (manual, Freesurfer [FS], and FSL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 27 patients with BD and 40 healthy controls. T1-weighted images in the sagittal plane were acquired on a 3 Tesla (T) MR scanner. Hippocampal volumetry was performed using one manual and two automated methods (FS and FSL). One-way repeated analysis of variance was applied to test the differences in hippocampal volumes using the three segmentation methods. To evaluate the agreement among the three tested volumetric segmentation methods the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. RESULTS: Hippocampal volumes obtained from all methods were significantly different (P < 0.05) in BD patients after intracranial volume correction, indicating a reduction in volume, unless from the manual method of the left hippocampal volume. The ICCs of the hippocampal volume between the manual method and FS were 0.846 (right) and 0.859 (left), and between the manual method and FSL were 0.746 (right) and 0.654 (left). CONCLUSION: Both manual and automatic segmentation methods detected reductions in the hippocampal volumes in BD patients. Automated segmentation methods are a robust and reproducible option for assessing hippocampal volume.
PURPOSE: To compare the hippocampal volumes in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy controls, obtained by applying different segmentation methods (manual, Freesurfer [FS], and FSL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 27 patients with BD and 40 healthy controls. T1-weighted images in the sagittal plane were acquired on a 3 Tesla (T) MR scanner. Hippocampal volumetry was performed using one manual and two automated methods (FS and FSL). One-way repeated analysis of variance was applied to test the differences in hippocampal volumes using the three segmentation methods. To evaluate the agreement among the three tested volumetric segmentation methods the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. RESULTS: Hippocampal volumes obtained from all methods were significantly different (P < 0.05) in BDpatients after intracranial volume correction, indicating a reduction in volume, unless from the manual method of the left hippocampal volume. The ICCs of the hippocampal volume between the manual method and FS were 0.846 (right) and 0.859 (left), and between the manual method and FSL were 0.746 (right) and 0.654 (left). CONCLUSION: Both manual and automatic segmentation methods detected reductions in the hippocampal volumes in BDpatients. Automated segmentation methods are a robust and reproducible option for assessing hippocampal volume.
Authors: Chadi G Abdallah; Ramiro Salas; Andrea Jackowski; Philip Baldwin; João R Sato; Sanjay J Mathew Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Curtis L Johnson; Hillary Schwarb; Matthew D J McGarry; Aaron T Anderson; Graham R Huesmann; Bradley P Sutton; Neal J Cohen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Jiansong Xu; Hedy Kober; Xin Wang; Elise E DeVito; Kathleen M Carroll; Marc N Potenza Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: F Bartel; M van Herk; H Vrenken; F Vandaele; S Sunaert; K de Jaeger; N J Dollekamp; C Carbaat; E Lamers; E M T Dieleman; Y Lievens; D de Ruysscher; S B Schagen; M B de Ruiter; J C de Munck; J Belderbos Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Sara J M Arnold; Elena I Ivleva; Tejas A Gopal; Anil P Reddy; Haekyung Jeon-Slaughter; Carolyn B Sacco; Alan N Francis; Neeraj Tandon; Anup S Bidesi; Bradley Witte; Gaurav Poudyal; Godfrey D Pearlson; John A Sweeney; Brett A Clementz; Matcheri S Keshavan; Carol A Tamminga Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Dorothee Schoemaker; Claudia Buss; Kevin Head; Curt A Sandman; Elysia P Davis; M Mallar Chakravarty; Serge Gauthier; Jens C Pruessner Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 6.556