Benjamin J Morasco1, Jonathan P Duckart, Steven K Dobscha. 1. Mental Health and Clinical Neurosciences Division, Portland VA Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, 3710 SW US Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA. benjamin.morasco@va.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) have high rates of substance use disorders (SUD). SUD complicates pain treatment and may lead to worse outcomes. However, little information is available describing adherence to opioid treatment guidelines for CNCP generally, or guideline adherence for patients with comorbid SUD. OBJECTIVE: Examine adherence to clinical guidelines for opioid therapy over 12 months, comparing patients with SUD diagnoses made during the prior year to patients without SUD. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Administrative data were collected from veterans with CNCP receiving treatment within a Veterans Affairs regional healthcare network who were prescribed chronic opioid therapy in 2008 (n = 5814). KEY RESULTS: Twenty percent of CNCP patients prescribed chronic opioid therapy had a prior-year diagnosis of SUD. Patients with SUD were more likely to have pain diagnoses and psychiatric comorbidities. In adjusted analyses, patients with SUD were more likely than those without SUD to have had a mental health appointment (29.7% versus 17.2%, OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.26-1.77) and a urine drug screen (UDS) (47.0% versus 18.2%, OR = 3.53, 95% CI = 3.06-4.06) over 12 months. There were no significant differences between groups on receiving more intensive treatment in primary care (63.4% versus 61.0%), long-acting opioids (26.9% versus 26.0%), prescriptions for antidepressants (88.2% versus 85.8%, among patients with depression), or participating in physical therapy (30.6% versus 28.6%). Only 35% of patients with SUD received substance abuse treatment. CONCLUSIONS: CNCP patients with SUD were more likely to have mental health appointments and receive UDS monitoring, but not more likely to participate in other aspects of pain care compared to those without SUD. Given data suggesting patients with comorbid SUD may need more intensive treatment to achieve improvements in pain-related function, SUD patients may be at high risk for poor outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) have high rates of substance use disorders (SUD). SUD complicates pain treatment and may lead to worse outcomes. However, little information is available describing adherence to opioid treatment guidelines for CNCP generally, or guideline adherence for patients with comorbid SUD. OBJECTIVE: Examine adherence to clinical guidelines for opioid therapy over 12 months, comparing patients with SUD diagnoses made during the prior year to patients without SUD. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Administrative data were collected from veterans with CNCP receiving treatment within a Veterans Affairs regional healthcare network who were prescribed chronic opioid therapy in 2008 (n = 5814). KEY RESULTS: Twenty percent of CNCP patients prescribed chronic opioid therapy had a prior-year diagnosis of SUD. Patients with SUD were more likely to have pain diagnoses and psychiatric comorbidities. In adjusted analyses, patients with SUD were more likely than those without SUD to have had a mental health appointment (29.7% versus 17.2%, OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.26-1.77) and a urine drug screen (UDS) (47.0% versus 18.2%, OR = 3.53, 95% CI = 3.06-4.06) over 12 months. There were no significant differences between groups on receiving more intensive treatment in primary care (63.4% versus 61.0%), long-acting opioids (26.9% versus 26.0%), prescriptions for antidepressants (88.2% versus 85.8%, among patients with depression), or participating in physical therapy (30.6% versus 28.6%). Only 35% of patients with SUD received substance abuse treatment. CONCLUSIONS: CNCP patients with SUD were more likely to have mental health appointments and receive UDS monitoring, but not more likely to participate in other aspects of pain care compared to those without SUD. Given data suggesting patients with comorbid SUD may need more intensive treatment to achieve improvements in pain-related function, SUD patients may be at high risk for poor outcomes.
Authors: Beatrix M Schieffer; Quyhn Pham; Jennifer Labus; Ariel Baria; Walter Van Vort; Philip Davis; Frederick Davis; Bruce D Naliboff Journal: J Pain Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Roger Chou; Gilbert J Fanciullo; Perry G Fine; Jeremy A Adler; Jane C Ballantyne; Pamela Davies; Marilee I Donovan; David A Fishbain; Kathy M Foley; Jeffrey Fudin; Aaron M Gilson; Alexander Kelter; Alexander Mauskop; Patrick G O'Connor; Steven D Passik; Gavril W Pasternak; Russell K Portenoy; Ben A Rich; Richard G Roberts; Knox H Todd; Christine Miaskowski Journal: J Pain Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Brook I Martin; Richard A Deyo; Sohail K Mirza; Judith A Turner; Bryan A Comstock; William Hollingworth; Sean D Sullivan Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael Von Korff; Michael Von Korff; Kathleen Saunders; Gary Thomas Ray; Denise Boudreau; Cynthia Campbell; Joseph Merrill; Mark D Sullivan; Carolyn M Rutter; Michael J Silverberg; Caleb Banta-Green; Constance Weisner Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Charles S Cleeland; Cielito C Reyes-Gibby; Marie Schall; Kevin Nolan; Judith Paice; Jack M Rosenberg; Jane H Tollett; Robert D Kerns Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: C S Cleeland; R Gonin; A K Hatfield; J H Edmonson; R H Blum; J A Stewart; K J Pandya Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-03-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Julie R Gaither; Joseph L Goulet; William C Becker; Stephen Crystal; E Jennifer Edelman; Kirsha Gordon; Robert D Kerns; David Rimland; Melissa Skanderson; Daniel F Weisberg; Amy C Justice; David A Fiellin Journal: J Pain Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Jane M Liebschutz; Ziming Xuan; Christopher W Shanahan; Marc LaRochelle; Julia Keosaian; Donna Beers; George Guara; Kristen O'Connor; Daniel P Alford; Victoria Parker; Roger D Weiss; Jeffrey H Samet; Julie Crosson; Phoebe A Cushman; Karen E Lasser Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Melissa B Weimer; Tara A Macey; Christina Nicolaidis; Steven K Dobscha; Jonathan P Duckart; Benjamin J Morasco Journal: Pain Med Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Karen H Seal; Brian Borsari; Jennifer Tighe; Beth E Cohen; Kevin Delucchi; Benjamin J Morasco; Yongmei Li; Emily Sachs; Linda Abadjian; Erin C Watson; Jennifer K Manuel; Lea Vella; Jodie Trafton; Amanda Midboe Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-12-17 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Mark J Edlund; Bradley C Martin; Joan E Russo; Andrea DeVries; Jennifer B Braden; Mark D Sullivan Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Kelly S Barth; Sarah Ball; Rachel S Adams; Ruslan Nikitin; Nikki R Wooten; Zaina P Qureshi; Mary J Larson Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2017 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Karen E Lasser; Christopher Shanahan; Victoria Parker; Donna Beers; Ziming Xuan; Orlaith Heymann; Allison Lange; Jane M Liebschutz Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2015-07-15