Literature DB >> 21562896

[Evidence-based anesthesiology: knowledge transfer from research into clinical practice].

H R Grobe1, F Kunath, M R Tramèr, B Lang, J J Meerpohl.   

Abstract

In the interest of patients evidence-based healthcare should be provided and is increasingly being demanded worldwide. In the daily medical practice however, healthcare based on proven scientific findings has not yet become firmly established. There are several causes for this. Problems occur at the level of knowledge generation, knowledge transfer from research into practice and also at the individual level of the treating healthcare professional. Nowadays, with a rapidly growing amount of knowledge it is almost impossible for the individual to quickly filter out the relevant facts. This article aims to shed light on the various aspects of the process of knowledge transfer from a clinical trial to evidence-based guidelines. It will make the reader aware of potential problems during this process and show some feasible approaches to solving them. Wherever possible, the field of anesthesiology will be used as the reference point. Evidence-based information sources will be presented and advice on how to use them will be given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21562896     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-011-1895-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  32 in total

1.  Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.

Authors:  K D Kelly; A Travers; M Dorgan; L Slater; B H Rowe
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Randomized controlled trials of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: could clinical equipoise have stopped the bleeding?

Authors:  Dean Fergusson; Kathleen Cranley Glass; Brian Hutton; Stan Shapiro
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study.

Authors:  M R Tramèr; D J Reynolds; R A Moore; H J McQuay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

Review 4.  Publication bias in the medical literature: a review by a Canadian Research Ethics Board.

Authors:  Richard Hall; Cecilia de Antueno; Adam Webber
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence.

Authors:  K Dickersin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Iveta Simera; John Hoey; David Moher; Ken Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Susceptibility to fraud in systematic reviews: lessons from the Reuben case.

Authors:  Emmanuel Marret; Nadia Elia; Jørgen B Dahl; Henry J McQuay; Steen Møiniche; R Andrew Moore; Sebastian Straube; Martin R Tramèr
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Ensuring safe and effective drugs: who can do what it takes?

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Peter Doshi; Matthew Thompson; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-01-11

Review 9.  Becoming a medical information master: feeling good about not knowing everything.

Authors:  D C Slawson; A F Shaughnessy; J H Bennett
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?

Authors:  Taixiang Wu; Youping Li; Zhaoxiang Bian; Guanjian Liu; David Moher
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.