Literature DB >> 21561787

Contemporary results after surgical repair of type A aortic dissection in patients aged 80 years and older: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fausto Biancari1, Francesco Vasques, Vincenzo Benenati, Tatu Juvonen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The benefits of surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection (AAD) in patients aged 80 years and older are questioned by the perceived high operative risk of these patients. This issue has been investigated in the present meta-analysis of observational studies.
METHODS: Studies on surgical repair of AAD in patients aged 80 years and older were identified up to January 2011. The results were expressed as pooled proportions with 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
RESULTS: Pooled analysis showed that patients aged 80 years and older included in six studies had a significantly higher risk of immediate postoperative mortality compared with younger patients (risk ratio 2.32, 95% CI 1.47-3.66, p<0.0001, pooled estimates 45.7% vs 19.5%). Analysis of data retrieved from nine studies reporting on the results of surgical treatment of AAD in a total of 308 patients aged 80 years and older showed a pooled mortality rate of 36.7% (95% CI 23.8-51.8%, 111/308 patients). The pooled stroke rate was 11.9% (95% CI 7.3-18.7%, 37/347 patients). Pooled analysis of data from two studies evaluating patients surgically or medically treated showed a non-significant reduced risk of immediate postoperative death after surgery (risk ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.14-1.29, pooled estimates: 25.2% vs 59.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate postoperative survival rates after surgery for AAD in patients aged 80 years and older are satisfactory. These findings suggest a confident approach toward emergency repair of AAD in this fragile patient population. More data on the intermediate survival and quality of life of these patients are, however, needed to better establish the role of emergency surgery for AAD in octogenarians and nonagenarians.
Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21561787     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  11 in total

Review 1.  Aortic dissections in the elderly: ethical dilemmas of treatment.

Authors:  Anthony L Estrera; Hazim J Safi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

2.  Successful surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection without the use of blood products.

Authors:  N Papalexopoulou; R Q Attia; V N Bapat
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Outcomes in the current surgical era following operative repair of acute Type A aortic dissection in the elderly: a single-institutional experience.

Authors:  Ahmet Kilic; Richard Tang; Bryan A Whitson; John H Sirak; Chittoor B Sai-Sudhakar; Juan Crestanello; Robert S D Higgins
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-05

4.  A single preoperative FGF23 measurement is a strong predictor of outcome in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Timo Speer; Heinrich V Groesdonk; Beate Zapf; Vanessa Buescher; Miriam Beyse; Laura Duerr; Stella Gewert; Patrizia Krauss; Aaron Poppleton; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Danilo Fliser; Hans-Joachim Schaefers; Matthias Klingele
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  A Simple Emergency Prediction Tool for Acute Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Wen Peng; Qing-Yi Zhu; Xiang-Hong Zhou; Xiang-Ping Chai
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.429

6.  Hospital mortality of patients aged 80 and older after surgical repair for type A acute aortic dissection in Japan.

Authors:  Tetsu Ohnuma; Daisuke Shinjo; Kiyohide Fushimi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Outcomes of surgery for acute type A dissection in octogenarians versus non-octogenarians: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Aditya Eranki; Michael Merakis; Michael L Williams; Campbell D Flynn; Claudia Villanueva; Ashley Wilson-Smith; Yangsin Lee; Ross Mejia
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 8.  Surgical repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection in elderly patients: a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vito D Bruno; Pierpaolo Chivasso; Gustavo Guida; Hunaid A Vohra
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-07

Review 9.  The evolution of cardiovascular surgery in elderly patient: a review of current options and outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Nicolini; Andrea Agostinelli; Antonella Vezzani; Tullio Manca; Filippo Benassi; Alberto Molardi; Tiziano Gherli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Outcomes of Acute Aortic Dissection Surgery in Octogenarians.

Authors:  Ming-En Hsu; An-Hsun Chou; Yu-Ting Cheng; Hsiu-An Lee; Kuo-Sheng Liu; Dong-Yi Chen; Victor Chien-Chia Wu; Pao-Hsien Chu; Tien-Hsing Chen; Shao-Wei Chen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.