Literature DB >> 21560169

Statistical analysis of protein structures suggests that buried ionizable residues in proteins are hydrogen bonded or form salt bridges.

Jeffrey Bush1, George I Makhatadze.   

Abstract

It is well known that nonpolar residues are largely buried in the interior of proteins, whereas polar and ionizable residues tend to be more localized on the protein surface where they are solvent exposed. Such a distribution of residues between surface and interior is well understood from a thermodynamic point: nonpolar side chains are excluded from the contact with the solvent water, whereas polar and ionizable groups have favorable interactions with the water and thus are preferred at the protein surface. However, there is an increasing amount of information suggesting that polar and ionizable residues do occur in the protein core, including at positions that have no known functional importance. This is inconsistent with the observations that dehydration of polar and in particular ionizable groups is very energetically unfavorable. To resolve this, we performed a detailed analysis of the distribution of fractional burial of polar and ionizable residues using a large set of ˜2600 nonhomologous protein structures. We show that when ionizable residues are fully buried, the vast majority of them form hydrogen bonds and/or salt bridges with other polar/ionizable groups. This observation resolves an apparent contradiction: the energetic penalty of dehydration of polar/ionizable groups is paid off by favorable energy of hydrogen bonding and/or salt bridge formation in the protein interior. Our conclusion agrees well with the previous findings based on the continuum models for electrostatic interactions in proteins.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21560169     DOI: 10.1002/prot.23067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  10 in total

1.  The role of cross-chain ionic interactions for the stability of collagen model peptides.

Authors:  Neelam Keshwani; Shounak Banerjee; Barbara Brodsky; George I Makhatadze
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Peptide-lipid interactions of the stress-response peptide TisB that induces bacterial persistence.

Authors:  Thomas Steinbrecher; Sebastian Prock; Johannes Reichert; Parvesh Wadhwani; Benjamin Zimpfer; Jochen Bürck; Marina Berditsch; Marcus Elstner; Anne S Ulrich
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Isotope-Labeled Aspartate Sidechain as a Non-Perturbing Infrared Probe: Application to Investigate the Dynamics of a Carboxylate Buried Inside a Protein.

Authors:  Rachel M Abaskharon; Stephen P Brown; Wenkai Zhang; Jianxin Chen; Amos B Smith; Feng Gai
Journal:  Chem Phys Lett       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.328

4.  Protons as second messenger regulators of G protein signaling.

Authors:  Daniel G Isom; Vishwajith Sridharan; Rachael Baker; Sarah T Clement; David M Smalley; Henrik G Dohlman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Structural features of cholesteryl ester transfer protein: a molecular dynamics simulation study.

Authors:  Dongsheng Lei; Xing Zhang; Shengbo Jiang; Zhaodi Cai; Matthew J Rames; Lei Zhang; Gang Ren; Shengli Zhang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-11-12

6.  ProteinVolume: calculating molecular van der Waals and void volumes in proteins.

Authors:  Calvin R Chen; George I Makhatadze
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Molecular determinant of the effects of hydrostatic pressure on protein folding stability.

Authors:  Calvin R Chen; George I Makhatadze
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Antiproliferative and Proapoptotic Effects of a Protein Component Purified from Aspongopus chinensis Dallas on Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Jun Tan; Ying Tian; Renlian Cai; Tianci Yi; Daochao Jin; Jianjun Guo
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  Design of buried charged networks in artificial proteins.

Authors:  Michael Röpke; Max E Mühlbauer; Mona Baumgart; Sam Asami; Sophie L Mader; Kai Fredriksson; Michael Groll; Ana P Gamiz-Hernandez; Ville R I Kaila
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Exploring CCRL2 chemerin binding using accelerated molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Marianna Bufano; Mattia Laffranchi; Silvano Sozzani; Domenico Raimondo; Romano Silvestri; Antonio Coluccia
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2022-04-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.