Literature DB >> 21559952

53BP1 and MDC1 foci formation in HT-1080 cells for low- and high-LET microbeam irradiations.

Marita Mosconi1, Ulrich Giesen, Frank Langner, Christian Mielke, Ilaria Dalla Rosa, Wilhelm G Dirks.   

Abstract

An improved assessment of the biological effects and related risks of low doses of ionizing radiation is currently an important issue in radiation biology. Irradiations using microbeams are particularly well suited for precise and localized dose depositions, whereas recombinant cell lines with fluorescent proteins allow the live observation of radiation-induced foci. Living cells of the fibrosarcoma cell line HT-1080 stably expressing 53BP1 or full-length reconstituted MDC1 fused to Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) were irradiated with protons and α-particles of linear energy transfers (LETs) of 15 and 75 keV/μm, respectively. Using a microbeam, the irradiations were carried out in line patterns, which facilitated the discrimination between undefined background and radiation-induced foci. As expected, foci formation and respective kinetics from α-particle irradiations with a high LET of 75 keV/μm could be detected in a reliable manner by both fusion proteins, as reported previously. Colocalization of γ-H2AX foci confirmed the DSB nature of the detected foci. As a novel result, the application of protons with low LET of 15 keV/μm generated 53BP1- and MDC1-mediated foci of almost equal size and slightly different kinetics. This new data expands the capability of 53BP1 and wild-type MDC1 on visible foci formation in living cells after irradiation with low-LET particles. Furthermore, the kinetics in HT-1080 cells for α-particle irradiation show a delay of about 20 s for 53BP1 foci detection compared to wild-type MDC1, confirming the hierarchical assembly of both proteins. Preliminary data for proton irradiations are shown and also these indicate a delay for 53BP1 versus MDC1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21559952     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-011-0366-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  19 in total

1.  Live cell imaging of heavy-ion-induced radiation responses by beamline microscopy.

Authors:  B Jakob; J H Rudolph; N Gueven; M F Lavin; G Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Dose response and kinetics of foci disappearance following exposure to high- and low-LET ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Rasa Ugenskiene; Kevin Prise; Melvyn Folkard; Janusz Lekki; Zbigniew Stachura; Monika Zazula; Jerzy Stachura
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  BRIT1 regulates early DNA damage response, chromosomal integrity, and cancer.

Authors:  Rekha Rai; Hui Dai; Asha S Multani; Kaiyi Li; Koei Chin; Joe Gray; John P Lahad; Jiyong Liang; Gordon B Mills; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Shiaw-Yih Lin
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination in mismatch repair-defective mammalian cells.

Authors:  B Elliott; M Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Dicistronic transcription units for gene expression in mammalian cells.

Authors:  W Dirks; M Wirth; H Hauser
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1993-06-30       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  The 3' to 5' exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  T T Paull; M Gellert
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  GammaH2AX and cancer.

Authors:  William M Bonner; Christophe E Redon; Jennifer S Dickey; Asako J Nakamura; Olga A Sedelnikova; Stéphanie Solier; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Crucial role for DNA ligase III in mitochondria but not in Xrcc1-dependent repair.

Authors:  Deniz Simsek; Amy Furda; Yankun Gao; Jérôme Artus; Erika Brunet; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis; Bennett Van Houten; Stewart Shuman; Peter J McKinnon; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways.

Authors:  Minli Wang; Weizhong Wu; Wenqi Wu; Bustanur Rosidi; Lihua Zhang; Huichen Wang; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks after low-dose gamma-irradiation.

Authors:  Aroumougame Asaithamby; David J Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  New challenges in radiobiology research with microbeams.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Anna A Friedl
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 2.  Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond.

Authors:  Antoni Rucinski; Anna Biernacka; Reinhard Schulte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Quantitative estimation of DNA damage by photon irradiation based on the microdosimetric-kinetic model.

Authors:  Yusuke Matsuya; Yosuke Ohtsubo; Kaori Tsutsumi; Kohei Sasaki; Rie Yamazaki; Hiroyuki Date
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Microbeam irradiation of C. elegans nematode in microfluidic channels.

Authors:  M Buonanno; G Garty; M Grad; M Gendrel; O Hobert; D J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Changes in the number of double-strand DNA breaks in Chinese hamster V79 cells exposed to γ-radiation with different dose rates.

Authors:  Konstantin V Kotenko; Andrey Y Bushmanov; Ivan V Ozerov; Denis V Guryev; Natalya A Anchishkina; Nadezhda M Smetanina; Ekaterina Y Arkhangelskaya; Natalya Y Vorobyeva; Andreyan N Osipov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Proteomic Analysis Implicates Dominant Alterations of RNA Metabolism and the Proteasome Pathway in the Cellular Response to Carbon-Ion Irradiation.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Hua Guan; Da-Fei Xie; Yi Xie; Xiao-Dan Liu; Qi Wang; Li Sui; Man Song; Hong Zhang; Jianhua Zhou; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Single α-particle irradiation permits real-time visualization of RNF8 accumulation at DNA damaged sites.

Authors:  Giovanna Muggiolu; Michal Pomorski; Gérard Claverie; Guillaume Berthet; Christine Mer-Calfati; Samuel Saada; Guillaume Devès; Marina Simon; Hervé Seznec; Philippe Barberet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Estimation of the radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks number by considering cell cycle and absorbed dose per cell nucleus.

Authors:  Ryosuke Mori; Yusuke Matsuya; Yuji Yoshii; Hiroyuki Date
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Recruitment kinetics of DNA repair proteins Mdc1 and Rad52 but not 53BP1 depend on damage complexity.

Authors:  Volker Hable; Guido A Drexler; Tino Brüning; Christian Burgdorf; Christoph Greubel; Anja Derer; Judith Seel; Hilmar Strickfaden; Thomas Cremer; Anna A Friedl; Günther Dollinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of early DNA damage response proteins on complex DNA lesions.

Authors:  Frank Tobias; Daniel Löb; Nicor Lengert; Marco Durante; Barbara Drossel; Gisela Taucher-Scholz; Burkhard Jakob
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.