Literature DB >> 26337266

Efficacy of selected anthelmintic drugs against cyathostomins in horses in the federal state of Brandenburg, Germany.

Juliane K Fischer1, Barbara Hinney2, Matthew J Denwood3, Donato Traversa4, Georg von Samson-Himmelstjerna5, Peter-Henning Clausen6.   

Abstract

Cyathostomins are currently the most common internal parasites of horses. With the intensive use of anthelmintic drugs over the past decades, resistance of cyathostomins to anthelmintics is becoming a growing problem in many countries. The aim of this study was to assess the current situation on horse farms in the German federal state of Brandenburg. A pre-selected population of horses from 24 premises that had shown a prevalence of cyathostomins higher than the average in a previous study was examined for anthelmintic efficacy. Faecal egg count reduction tests (FECRTs) were performed for ivermectin (IVM) and pyrantel (PYR). For IVM, the egg reappearance period (ERP) was also examined, as a shortened ERP can be indicative of developing resistance. The efficacy of IVM on cyathostomins was high: 99.1 % of 224 horses had a zero egg count 14 days after treatment. No shortening of the ERP was detected. For the data of the FECRT for PYR, three different methods of calculation were employed: (a) the method as recommended by the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP), (b) a bootstrapping method and (c) a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Two methods of interpretation for these data were used: Resistance was declared (a) when FECR was <90 % and the lower 95 % confidence interval (LCL) <80 % and (b) when additionally the upper 95 % confidence level (UCL) was <95 %. When applying the first interpretation, resistance against PYR was found on four yards, while, when considering the UCL, all three methods for calculation only detected resistance on one single yard. Twelve species of cyathostomins were detected in larval cultures derived from strongyle egg positive faecal samples collected 14 days after treatment with PYR by reverse line blot hybridization (RLB). In order to generate comparable data, it is suggested to establish international standards for the calculation of FECRT data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthelmintics; Cyathostomins; Horses; Nematodes; Resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26337266     DOI: 10.1007/s00436-015-4685-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitol Res        ISSN: 0932-0113            Impact factor:   2.289


  29 in total

1.  Anthelmintic resistance and the control of worms.

Authors:  G C Coles
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Detection of anthelmintic resistance: a comparison of mathematical techniques.

Authors:  P R Torgerson; M Schnyder; H Hertzberg
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 2.738

3.  Statistical approach to measure the efficacy of anthelmintic treatment on horse farms.

Authors:  A N Vidyashankar; R M Kaplan; S Chan
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Methods to determine resistance to anthelmintics when continuing larval development occurs.

Authors:  M Lyndal-Murphy; A J Swain; P M Pepper
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.738

5.  Monitoring drug efficacy against gastrointestinal nematodes when faecal egg counts are low: do the analytic sensitivity and the formula matter?

Authors:  Bruno Levecke; Laura Rinaldi; Johannes Charlier; Maria Paola Maurelli; Maria Elena Morgoglione; Jozef Vercruysse; Giuseppe Cringoli
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Anthelmintic resistance in goats in southern Thailand.

Authors:  S Kochapakdee; V S Pandey; W Pralomkarn; S Choldumrongkul; W Ngampongsai; A Lawpetchara
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1995-07-29       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  [Field study of anthelmintic resistance of strongylids in horses].

Authors:  C Bauer; R Gandras; M Stoye; H J Bürger
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  1983-09-01       Impact factor: 0.328

8.  Anthelmintic efficacy against cyathostomins in horses in Southern England.

Authors:  H E Lester; J Spanton; C H Stratford; D J Bartley; E R Morgan; J E Hodgkinson; K Coumbe; T Mair; B Swan; G Lemon; R Cookson; J B Matthews
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 2.738

9.  A survey of helminth control practices in equine establishments in Ireland.

Authors:  Bryan O'Meara; Grace Mulcahy
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 2.738

10.  Comparison of three alternative methods for analysis of equine Faecal Egg Count Reduction Test data.

Authors:  M J Denwood; S W J Reid; S Love; M K Nielsen; L Matthews; I J McKendrick; G T Innocent
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.670

View more
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy of ivermectin against gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle in Denmark evaluated by different methods for analysis of faecal egg count reduction.

Authors:  Miguel Peña-Espinoza; Stig M Thamsborg; Matthew J Denwood; Markus Drag; Tina V Hansen; Vibeke F Jensen; Heidi L Enemark
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Cyathostomin resistance to moxidectin and combinations of anthelmintics in Australian horses.

Authors:  Ghazanfar Abbas; Abdul Ghafar; John Hurley; Jenni Bauquier; Anne Beasley; Edwina J A Wilkes; Caroline Jacobson; Charles El-Hage; Lucy Cudmore; Peter Carrigan; Brett Tennent-Brown; Charles G Gauci; Martin K Nielsen; Kristopher J Hughes; Ian Beveridge; Abdul Jabbar
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.876

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.