Literature DB >> 21558765

Sharps injuries among employees of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, 2002-2007.

Angela K Laramie1, Vivian C Pun, Shona C Fang, David Kriebel, Letitia Davis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sharps with engineered sharps injury protections (SESIPs) have been found to reduce risk of sharps injuries (SIs). We examined trends in SI rates among employees of acute care hospitals in Massachusetts, including the impact of SESIPs on SI trends during 2002-2007.
DESIGN: Prospective surveillance.
SETTING: Seventy-six acute care hospitals licensed by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. PARTICIPANTS: Employees of acute care hospitals who reported SIs to their employers.
METHODS: Data on SIs in acute care hospitals collected by the Massachusetts Sharps Injury Surveillance System were used to examine trends in SI rates over time by occupation, hospital size, and device. Negative binomial regression was used to assess trends.
RESULTS: During 2002-2007, 16,158 SIs among employees of 76 acute care hospitals were reported to the surveillance system. The annual SI rate decreased by 22%, with an annual decline of 4.7% (P < .001). Rates declined significantly among nurses (-7.2% per year; P < .001) but not among physicians (-0.9% per year; P = .553). SI rates associated with winged steel needles and hypodermic needles and syringes also declined significantly as the proportion of injuries involving devices with sharps injury prevention features increased during the same time period.
CONCLUSION: SI rates involving devices for which SESIPs are widely available and appear to be increasingly used have declined. The continued use of devices lacking SI protections for which SESIPs are available needs to be addressed. The extent to which injuries involving SESIPs are due to flaws in design or lack of experience and training must be examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21558765     DOI: 10.1086/660012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  6 in total

Review 1.  Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.

Authors:  Viraj K Reddy; Marie-Claude Lavoie; Jos H Verbeek; Manisha Pahwa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-14

2.  Temporal trends in occupational accidents involving exposure to biological material in Brazil, 2010 to 2016.

Authors:  Sâmea Cristina Santos Gomes; Thais Furtado Ferreira; Arlene de Jesus Mendes Caldas
Journal:  Rev Bras Med Trab       Date:  2021-04-30

3.  Understanding sharps injuries in home healthcare: The Safe Home Care qualitative methods study to identify pathways for injury prevention.

Authors:  Pia Markkanen; Catherine Galligan; Angela Laramie; June Fisher; Susan Sama; Margaret Quinn
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Risk of Sharps Injuries to Home Care Nurses and Aides: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Natalie M Brouillette; Margaret M Quinn; David Kriebel
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  Time Trends of Percutaneous Injuries in Hospital Nurses: Evidence of the Interference between Effects of Adoption of Safety Devices and Organizational Factors.

Authors:  Marco M Ferrario; Giovanni Veronesi; Rossana Borchini; Marco Cavicchiolo; Oriana Dashi; Daniela Dalla Gasperina; Giovanna Martinelli; Francesco Gianfagna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Understanding the hospital sharps injury reporting pathway.

Authors:  Leslie I Boden; Yolanta V Petrofsky; Karen Hopcia; Gregory R Wagner; Dean Hashimoto
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.214

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.