Literature DB >> 21558133

Preoperative chemotherapy for operable breast cancer improves surgical outcomes in the community hospital setting.

Ian K Komenaka1, Michael L Hibbard, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Boo Ghee Low, Jason A Salganick, Marcia E Bouton, Chandra Jha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemotherapy (PC) for operable breast cancer has demonstrated significant benefits in clinical trials. Many patients are treated in the community setting and some may question the applicability of PC outside the university setting. The potential benefits of PC in terms of surgical outcomes in a community practice were examined.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of stage II and stage IIIA breast cancer patients from January 1, 2002 to July 31, 2009. Surgical outcomes of margin status, volume of lumpectomy, rate of lumpectomy, and re-excision lumpectomy were evaluated.
RESULTS: There were 212 patients included. Seventy-nine percent of patients who underwent PC had a clinical response and 25% had a pathologic complete response. For clinical stage T2 and stage T3 tumors, the PC group underwent lumpectomy more often than patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) group (78% versus 50%; p = .016 and 60% versus 29%; p = .015, respectively). The rate of close or positive margins in the PC group was half the rate in the AC group (23% versus 46%; p = .04) and this resulted in fewer re-excisions (p = .01). The volume of tissue removed was also smaller in the PC group (143.6 cm³ versus 273.9 cm³; p = .003). Conclusions. PC for operable breast cancer can significantly improve surgical outcomes in community-based practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21558133      PMCID: PMC3228206          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  32 in total

Review 1.  Consensus statement: treatment of early-stage breast cancer. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy.

Authors:  S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation.

Authors:  S K Al-Ghazal; R W Blamey; J Stewart; A A Morgan
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.

Authors:  N Wolmark; J Wang; E Mamounas; J Bryant; B Fisher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2001

5.  The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC 'boost vs. no boost' trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups.

Authors:  C Vrieling; L Collette; A Fourquet; W J Hoogenraad; J H Horiot; J J Jager; M Pierart; P M Poortmans; H Struikmans; B Maat; E Van Limbergen; H Bartelink
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  A gene expression signature that predicts the therapeutic response of the basal-like breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yiing Lin; Shin Lin; Mark Watson; Kathryn M Trinkaus; Sacha Kuo; Michael J Naughton; Katherine Weilbaecher; Timothy P Fleming; Rebecca L Aft
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27.

Authors:  Harry D Bear; Stewart Anderson; Ann Brown; Roy Smith; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Bernard Fisher; Richard Margolese; Heather Theoret; Atilla Soran; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma.

Authors:  D E Wazer; T DiPetrillo; R Schmidt-Ullrich; L Weld; T J Smith; D J Marchant; N J Robert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised.

Authors:  R A Cochrane; P Valasiadou; A R M Wilson; S K Al-Ghazal; R D Macmillan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Stefano Zurrida; Viviana Galimberti; Mattia Intra; Paolo Veronesi; Chris Robertson; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giuseppe Renne; Concetta De Cicco; Francesca De Lucia; Roberto Gennari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm shift in the local treatment of breast cancer: mastectomy to breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Kowsi Murugappan; Apoorva Saboo; Lu Kuo; Owen Ung
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population.

Authors:  Rozbeh Torabi; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Prahladbhai N Patel; Harikrishna Dave; Marcia E Bouton; Ian K Komenaka
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  José H Volders; Vera L Negenborn; Pauline E Spronk; Nicole M A Krekel; Linda J Schoonmade; Sybren Meijer; Isabel T Rubio; M Petrousjka van den Tol
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.