Literature DB >> 21557303

Repair of complete nerve lacerations at the forearm: an outcome study using Rosén-Lundborg protocol.

Spyridon P Galanakos1, Aristides B Zoubos, Ioannis Ignatiadis, Ioannis Papakostas, Nikolaos E Gerostathopoulos, Panayotis N Soucacos.   

Abstract

A comparison of outcomes based on a scoring system for assessments, described by Rosén and Lundborg, after sharp complete laceration of median and/or ulnar nerves at various levels in the forearm was carried out. There were 66 males (90.4%) and 7 females (9.6%), with a mean age of 31 years (range: 14-62 years). The patients were categorized into three groups according to the type of nerve injury. The median nerve was injured in 25 cases (group M, 34.3%), the ulnar in 27 (group U, 36.9%), and both the nerves in 21 (group MU, 28.8%). The demographic data of the patients and the mechanism of injury were recorded. We also examined the employment status at the time of the injury and we estimated the percentage of patients who returned to their work after trauma. In all cases, a primary epineural repair was performed. Concomitant injuries were repaired in the same setting. The mean period of time between injury and surgery was 5.3 hours (range: 2-120 hours). A rehabilitation protocol and a reeducation program were followed in all cases. The mean follow-up was 3 years (range: 2-6 years), with more distal injuries having a shorter follow-up period. The total score was 2.71 in group M (range: 0.79-2.99) and 2.63 in group U (range: 0.63-3), with no significant differences observed. There was a significant difference between these two groups and group MU (total score 2.03, range: 0.49-2.76, P = 0.02). Up to the last follow-up, 61 patients (83.5%) had returned to their previous work. The Rosén-Lundborg model can be a useful and simple tool for the evaluation of the functional outcome after nerve injury and repair temporally reflecting the processes of regeneration and reinnervation.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21557303     DOI: 10.1002/micr.20845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  5 in total

1.  Peripheral nerve injuries in the pediatric population: a review of the literature. Part I: traumatic nerve injuries.

Authors:  Javier Robla Costales; Mariano Socolovsky; Jaime A Sánchez Lázaro; Rubén Álvarez García
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Nerve injuries of the upper extremity associated with vascular trauma-surgical treatment and outcome.

Authors:  Lukas Rasulic; Ilijas Cinara; Miroslav Samardzic; Andrija Savic; Bojana Zivkovic; Filip Vitosevic; Mirko Micovic; Vladimir Bascarevic; Vladimir Puzovic; Stefan Mandic-Rajcevic
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Outcomes and Return to Work Following Complex Nerve Lacerations in the Volar Forearm in an Underserved Spanish-Speaking Population.

Authors:  Ryan B Bucknam; John C Dunn; Isaac Fernandez; Leon J Nesti; Gilberto A Gonzalez
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2020-02-20

4.  Outcome following nerve repair of high isolated clean sharp injuries of the ulnar nerve.

Authors:  René Post; Kornelis S de Boer; Martijn J A Malessy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Consequences and adaptation in daily life - patients' experiences three decades after a nerve injury sustained in adolescence.

Authors:  Anette Chemnitz; Lars B Dahlin; Ingela K Carlsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.