OBJECTIVE: Comparison of image quality in DE-CTA with and without automatic head bone removal (BR) versus CTA with 16-detectors as a tool in postoperative evaluation of patients after neurosurgical clipping. METHODS: In this study 30 aneurysms that had undergone neurosurgical clipping were included: 18 with DE-CTA and 12 with conventional CTA. The images were further processed using the volume rendering technique (VRT) and BR. Two experienced neuroradiologists reviewed the images regarding the severity of artefacts surrounding the clip, visibility of the vessels and remnant necks. The results were compared with DSA images, if performed. RESULTS: Significantly fewer disturbances by artefacts were observed in DE-CTA versus CTA in a 16-row system. Visibility of the surrounding vessels was satisfying in both techniques and there were comparable results with DSA with only one exception. All images produced with 140 kV provided fewer artefacts than those with 80 kV. CONCLUSION: DE-CTA provides better image quality with fewer disturbances by clip artefact, a satisfying evaluation of remnant aneurysm necks and the surrounding vessels. As this method is easily performed and readily accessible with fast image post-processing using BR it provides an opportunity to avoid invasive DSA in the evaluation of suspected aneurysm rests.
OBJECTIVE: Comparison of image quality in DE-CTA with and without automatic head bone removal (BR) versus CTA with 16-detectors as a tool in postoperative evaluation of patients after neurosurgical clipping. METHODS: In this study 30 aneurysms that had undergone neurosurgical clipping were included: 18 with DE-CTA and 12 with conventional CTA. The images were further processed using the volume rendering technique (VRT) and BR. Two experienced neuroradiologists reviewed the images regarding the severity of artefacts surrounding the clip, visibility of the vessels and remnant necks. The results were compared with DSA images, if performed. RESULTS: Significantly fewer disturbances by artefacts were observed in DE-CTA versus CTA in a 16-row system. Visibility of the surrounding vessels was satisfying in both techniques and there were comparable results with DSA with only one exception. All images produced with 140 kV provided fewer artefacts than those with 80 kV. CONCLUSION: DE-CTA provides better image quality with fewer disturbances by clip artefact, a satisfying evaluation of remnant aneurysm necks and the surrounding vessels. As this method is easily performed and readily accessible with fast image post-processing using BR it provides an opportunity to avoid invasive DSA in the evaluation of suspected aneurysm rests.
Authors: Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Axel Kuettner; Thomas Flohr; Bernd Ohnesorge; Herbert Bruder; Heike Theessen; Meri Karakaya; Werner G Daniel; Werner Bautz; Willi A Kalender; Katharina Anders Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2006-01-19 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Jean Marie U-King-Im; Brendan Koo; Rikin A Trivedi; Nicholas J Higgins; Keng Y Tay; Justin J Cross; Nagui M Antoun; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-02-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nicolaas A Bakker; Henriette E Westerlaan; Jan D M Metzemaekers; J Marc C van Dijk; Omid S Eshghi; Jan Jakob A Mooij; Rob J M Groen Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Dominik Morhard; Christian Fink; Anno Graser; Maximilian F Reiser; Christoph Becker; Thorsten R C Johnson Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Aikaterini Fitsiori; Steve Philippe Martin; Alix Juillet De Saint Lager; Joanna Gariani; Karl-Olof Lovblad; Xavier Montet; Maria Isabel Vargas Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Su Young Yun; Young Jin Heo; Hae Woong Jeong; Jin Wook Baek; Hye Jung Choo; Gi Won Shin; Sung Tae Kim; Young Gyun Jeong; Ji Young Lee; Hyun Seok Jung Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 2.804