BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial. The purpose of our analysis was to explore the outcome of patients with RCC who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy at our institution. METHODS: We reviewed data on 25 patients who underwent resection of lung metastasis from 1998 to 2008 at our institution. RESULTS: All patients were treated by radical nephrectomy for primary RCC. Progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 0.3 to 198.8 months (median 7.4 months), and overall survival (OS) ranged from 2.4 to 198.8 months (median 33.9 months). The 5-year PFS rate was 24.9%, and the OS rate was 35.5%. Although differences in the resectability of the metastasectomy and OS were not significant in univariate or multivariate analyses, the relationship between PFS and the radicality of pulmonary metastasectomy was significant in both the univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.004, 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of pulmonary metastasectomy for patients with RCC at our institution indicate that pulmonary metastasectomy should be performed only when the pulmonary metastasis can be completely resected. Additional studies are therefore necessary to evaluate the prognostic factors and to determine the selection criteria for pulmonary metastasectomy in the new era of molecular-targeted agents.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial. The purpose of our analysis was to explore the outcome of patients with RCC who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy at our institution. METHODS: We reviewed data on 25 patients who underwent resection of lung metastasis from 1998 to 2008 at our institution. RESULTS: All patients were treated by radical nephrectomy for primary RCC. Progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 0.3 to 198.8 months (median 7.4 months), and overall survival (OS) ranged from 2.4 to 198.8 months (median 33.9 months). The 5-year PFS rate was 24.9%, and the OS rate was 35.5%. Although differences in the resectability of the metastasectomy and OS were not significant in univariate or multivariate analyses, the relationship between PFS and the radicality of pulmonary metastasectomy was significant in both the univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.004, 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of pulmonary metastasectomy for patients with RCC at our institution indicate that pulmonary metastasectomy should be performed only when the pulmonary metastasis can be completely resected. Additional studies are therefore necessary to evaluate the prognostic factors and to determine the selection criteria for pulmonary metastasectomy in the new era of molecular-targeted agents.
Authors: Joachim Pfannschmidt; Hans Hoffmann; Thomas Muley; Sabine Krysa; Christine Trainer; Hendrik Dienemann Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Joachim Pfannschmidt; Gerlinde Egerer; Marc Bischof; Michael Thomas; Hendrik Dienemann Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Juliane Hoerner-Rieber; Marciana Duma; Oliver Blanck; Guido Hildebrandt; Andrea Wittig; Fabian Lohaus; Michael Flentje; Frederick Mantel; Robert Krempien; Michael J Eble; Klaus Henning Kahl; Judit Boda-Heggemann; Stefan Rieken; Matthias Guckenberger Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Till Markowiak; Beshir Dakkak; Elena Loch; Christian Großer; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Hans-Stefan Hofmann; Michael Ried Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 1.637