Literature DB >> 21556305

No-fault compensation following adverse events attributed to vaccination: a review of international programmes.

Clare Looker1, Heath Kelly.   

Abstract

Programmes that provide no-fault compensation for an adverse event following vaccination have been implemented in 19 countries worldwide, the first in Germany in 1961 and the most recent in Hungary in 2005. We performed a review of these programmes and determined elements that were common to all of them: administration and funding, eligibility, process and decision-making, standard of proof, elements of compensation and litigation rights. Most programmes were administered by state or national governments except in Finland and Sweden where they are coordinated by pharmaceutical manufacturers. Although funding is usually from Treasury, Taiwan (China) and the United States of America impose a tax on vaccine doses distributed. Decisions on compensation are made using established criteria or assessed on a case-by-case basis, while the standard of proof required is usually less than that required for court cases. Benefits provided by programmes include medical costs, disability pensions and benefits for noneconomic loss and death. Most countries allow claimants to seek legal damages through the courts or a compensation scheme payout but not both. We conclude that a variety of programmes, based on ethical principles, have been successful and financially viable in developed countries throughout the world. We believe there is a strong argument for widespread implementation of these programmes in other developed countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21556305      PMCID: PMC3089384          DOI: 10.2471/BLT.10.081901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  13 in total

1.  Monitoring signals for vaccine safety: the assessment of individual adverse event reports by an expert advisory committee. Advisory Committee on Causality Assessment.

Authors:  J P Collet; N MacDonald; N Cashman; R Pless
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Compensation programs for vaccine-related injury abroad: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Wendy K Mariner
Journal:  St Louis Univ Law J       Date:  1987

3.  THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?

Authors:  A B HILL
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1965-05

4.  Should Australia introduce a vaccine injury compensation scheme?

Authors:  D Isaacs
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.954

5.  Compensation for vaccine injury in Hungary.

Authors:  Imre Boncz; Andor Sebestyén
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Rationalizing vaccine injury compensation.

Authors:  Michelle M Mello
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.898

7.  Vaccine adverse event monitoring systems across the European Union countries: time for unifying efforts.

Authors:  Giovanna Zanoni; Piero Berra; Ilaria Lucchi; Antonio Ferro; Darina O'Flanagan; Daniel Levy-Bruhl; Stefania Salmaso; Giuseppe Tridente
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  [Compensation for vaccination accidents].

Authors:  S Gromb; M Dupon
Journal:  Med Mal Infect       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.152

9.  Vaccine injury compensation programs worldwide.

Authors:  G Evans
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1999-10-29       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  The missed lessons of Sir Austin Bradford Hill.

Authors:  Carl V Phillips; Karen J Goodman
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2004-10-04
View more
  15 in total

1.  Human papilloma virus: Restore vaccine trust in Japan.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tanimoto; Eiji Kusumi; Claire Leppold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Compensation programs after withdrawal of the recommendation for HPV vaccine in Japan.

Authors:  Koichiro Yuji; Haruka Nakada
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Raising Rates of Childhood Vaccination: The Trade-off Between Coercion and Trust.

Authors:  Bridget Haire; Paul Komesaroff; Rose Leontini; C Raina MacIntyre
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 1.352

4.  Management of vaccine safety in Korea.

Authors:  Young June Choe; Geun-Ryang Bae
Journal:  Clin Exp Vaccine Res       Date:  2013-01-15

5.  The Ebola Vaccine, Iatrogenic Injuries, and Legal Liability.

Authors:  Amir Attaran; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Global landscape analysis of no-fault compensation programmes for vaccine injuries: A review and survey of implementing countries.

Authors:  Randy G Mungwira; Christine Guillard; Adiela Saldaña; Nobuhiko Okabe; Helen Petousis-Harris; Edinam Agbenu; Lance Rodewald; Patrick L F Zuber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Perspectives on vaccine injury compensation program in Korea: the pediatricians' view.

Authors:  Dae Sun Jo; Jung Soo Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Vaccine Res       Date:  2013-01-15

8.  Vaccine adverse events reported during the first ten years (1998-2008) after introduction in the state of Rondonia, Brazil.

Authors:  Mônica P L Cunha; José G Dórea; Rejane C Marques; Renata S Leão
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  No association between HPV vaccine and reported post-vaccination symptoms in Japanese young women: Results of the Nagoya study.

Authors:  Sadao Suzuki; Akihiro Hosono
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2018-02-23

10.  Voluntary vaccination: the pandemic effect.

Authors:  Emma Cave
Journal:  Leg Stud (Soc Leg Scholars)       Date:  2016-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.