Literature DB >> 15151575

Should Australia introduce a vaccine injury compensation scheme?

D Isaacs1.   

Abstract

At least a dozen countries or states in the world have introduced vaccine injury compensation schemes. This paper argues that the Australian Government should introduce such a scheme, which may reduce litigation, and may improve consumer and provider confidence. The most important justification, however, is an ethical argument from justice and equity: introduction of a vaccine injury compensation scheme acknowledges the unique situation that routine childhood immunization is a public health measure, given and accepted in good faith, that may occasionally damage the recipient.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15151575     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2004.00357.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1034-4810            Impact factor:   1.954


  3 in total

Review 1.  No-fault compensation following adverse events attributed to vaccination: a review of international programmes.

Authors:  Clare Looker; Heath Kelly
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Global landscape analysis of no-fault compensation programmes for vaccine injuries: A review and survey of implementing countries.

Authors:  Randy G Mungwira; Christine Guillard; Adiela Saldaña; Nobuhiko Okabe; Helen Petousis-Harris; Edinam Agbenu; Lance Rodewald; Patrick L F Zuber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The Model of "Informed Refusal" for Vaccination: How to Fight against Anti-Vaccinationist Misinformation without Disregarding the Principle of Self-Determination.

Authors:  Stefano D'Errico; Emanuela Turillazzi; Martina Zanon; Rocco Valerio Viola; Paola Frati; Vittorio Fineschi
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.