Literature DB >> 21554535

Sensitivity to rewarding or aversive effects of methamphetamine determines methamphetamine intake.

S Shabani1, C S McKinnon, C Reed, C L Cunningham, T J Phillips.   

Abstract

Amphetamines have rewarding and aversive effects. Relative sensitivity to these effects may be a better predictor of vulnerability to addiction than sensitivity to one of these effects alone. We tested this hypothesis in a dose-response study in a second replicate set of mouse lines selectively bred for high vs. low methamphetamine (MA) drinking (MADR). Replicate 2 high (MAHDR-2) and low (MALDR-2) MA drinking mice were bred based on MA consumption in a two-bottle choice procedure and examined for novel tastant drinking. Sensitivities to the rewarding and aversive effects of several doses of MA (0.5, 2 and 4 mg/kg) were measured using a place conditioning procedure. After conditioning, mice were tested in a drug-free and then drug-present state for time spent in the saline- and MA-paired contexts. Similar to the first set of MADR lines, by the end of selection, MAHDR-2 mice consumed about 6 mg MA/kg/18 h, compared to nearly no MA in MALDR-2 mice, but had similar taste preference ratios. MAHDR-2 mice exhibited place preference in both the drug-free and drug-present tests, and no significant place aversion. In contrast, MALDR-2 mice exhibited no place preference or aversion during the drug-free test, but robust place aversion in the drug-present test. These data extend our preliminary findings from the first set of MADR lines and support the hypothesis that the combination of greater sensitivity to the rewarding effects of MA and insensitivity to the aversive effects of MA is genetically associated with heightened risk for MA consumption. Genes, Brain and Behavior
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society. No claim to original US government works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21554535      PMCID: PMC3320762          DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2011.00700.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  31 in total

1.  An examination of drug craving over time in abstinent methamphetamine users.

Authors:  Gantt P Galloway; Edward G Singleton; Raymond Buscemi; Matthew J Baggott; René M Dickerhoof; John E Mendelson
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2010-09-21

Review 2.  A review of the clinical pharmacology of methamphetamine.

Authors:  Christopher C Cruickshank; Kyle R Dyer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Genetically correlated effects of selective breeding for high and low methamphetamine consumption.

Authors:  J M Wheeler; C Reed; S Burkhart-Kasch; N Li; C L Cunningham; A Janowsky; F H Franken; K M Wiren; J G Hashimoto; A C Scibelli; T J Phillips
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 4.  Conditioned taste aversion learning: implications for animal models of drug abuse.

Authors:  Catherine M Davis; Anthony L Riley
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  What is a "low dose" of d-amphetamine for inducing behavioral effects in laboratory rats?

Authors:  D M Grilly; A Loveland
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Oral drug self-administration: an overview of laboratory animal studies.

Authors:  R A Meisch
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.405

7.  Long-term voluntary D-amphetamine consumption and behavioral predictors for subsequent D-amphetamine addiction in rats.

Authors:  Gabriel Galli; Jochen Wolffgramm
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Clinical effects of methamphetamine vapor inhalation.

Authors:  M Perez-Reyes; W R White; S A McDonald; J M Hill; A R Jeffcoat; C E Cook
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.037

Review 9.  The methamphetamine problem in the United States.

Authors:  Rachel Gonzales; Larissa Mooney; Richard A Rawson
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 10.  Apparatus bias and place conditioning with ethanol in mice.

Authors:  Christopher L Cunningham; Nikole K Ferree; MacKenzie A Howard
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  43 in total

1.  Unique genetic factors influence sensitivity to the rewarding and aversive effects of methamphetamine versus cocaine.

Authors:  Noah R Gubner; Cheryl Reed; Carrie S McKinnon; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A genetic animal model of differential sensitivity to methamphetamine reinforcement.

Authors:  Shkelzen Shabani; Lauren K Dobbs; Matthew M Ford; Gregory P Mark; Deborah A Finn; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Behavioral inhibition in mice bred for high vs. low levels of methamphetamine consumption or sensitization.

Authors:  Travis M Moschak; Katherine A Stang; Tamara J Phillips; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Impaired memory and reduced sensitivity to the circadian period lengthening effects of methamphetamine in mice selected for high methamphetamine consumption.

Authors:  Reid H J Olsen; Charles N Allen; Victor A Derkach; Tamara J Phillips; John K Belknap; Jacob Raber
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Parallel Effects of Methamphetamine on Anxiety and CCL3 in Humans and a Genetic Mouse Model of High Methamphetamine Intake.

Authors:  Marilyn Huckans; Clare J Wilhelm; Tamara J Phillips; Elaine T Huang; Rebekah Hudson; Jennifer M Loftis
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.328

6.  Differential genetic risk for methamphetamine intake confers differential sensitivity to the temperature-altering effects of other addictive drugs.

Authors:  John R K Mootz; Nicholas B Miner; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  Genetic factors involved in risk for methamphetamine intake and sensitization.

Authors:  John K Belknap; Shannon McWeeney; Cheryl Reed; Sue Burkhart-Kasch; Carrie S McKinnon; Na Li; Harue Baba; Angela C Scibelli; Robert Hitzemann; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Cocaine self-administration punished by intravenous histamine in adolescent and adult rats.

Authors:  Nathan A Holtz; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.293

9.  Homer2 regulates alcohol and stress cross-sensitization.

Authors:  Sema G Quadir; Jaqueline Rocha Borges Dos Santos; Rianne R Campbell; Melissa G Wroten; Nimrita Singh; John J Holloway; Sukhmani K Bal; Rosana Camarini; Karen K Szumlinski
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.280

10.  Non-genetic factors that influence methamphetamine intake in a genetic model of differential methamphetamine consumption.

Authors:  A M Stafford; C Reed; T J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.