Literature DB >> 22311384

Behavioral inhibition in mice bred for high vs. low levels of methamphetamine consumption or sensitization.

Travis M Moschak1, Katherine A Stang, Tamara J Phillips, Suzanne H Mitchell.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Research indicates that genetics influence methamphetamine self-administration as well as sensitization to the psychomotor-stimulating effects of methamphetamine (MA). Other studies have suggested that heightened levels of impulsivity, including low levels of behavioral inhibition, are associated with the use of drugs, including MA.
OBJECTIVES: The current study examined whether lines of mice selected for traits associated with a heightened risk of developing MA dependence would also exhibit low levels of drug-naïve inhibition and whether administration of MA would result in different levels of inhibition in animals selected to consume or respond more to MA.
METHODS: A go/no-go task was used to assess inhibition in male and female mice selected for low or high levels of MA consumption or selected for high or low levels of locomotor sensitization to repeated injections of MA.
RESULTS: Mice selected for MA sensitization differed in false alarms, precue response rates (measures of behavioral inhibition), and also hits (measure of operant responding). Mice selected for MA consumption did not differ in measures of behavioral inhibition, though hits differed. When MA was administered prior to the task, false alarms, precue response rates, and hits decreased for mice from all selected lines. Female high drinking mice were particularly resistant to MA's effects on hits, but not precue response rate or false alarms.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a shared, but complex, genetic association between inhibition processes, general levels of operant responding, and MA sensitization or consumption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22311384      PMCID: PMC3383918          DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2650-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  47 in total

Review 1.  Misunderstanding analysis of covariance.

Authors:  G A Miller; J P Chapman
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2001-02

2.  Selective deficit in no-go performance induced by blockade of prefrontal cortical alpha 2-adrenoceptors in monkeys.

Authors:  Chao-Lin Ma; Xue-Lian Qi; Ji-Yun Peng; Bao-Ming Li
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-05-23       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Cannabis and other illicit drugs: comorbid use and abuse/dependence in males and females.

Authors:  Arpana Agrawal; Michael C Neale; Carol A Prescott; Kenneth S Kendler
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Experimental control is better.

Authors:  M Perone
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1999

5.  Executive dysfunction in substance dependent individuals during drug use and abstinence: an examination of the behavioral, cognitive and emotional correlates of addiction.

Authors:  Antonio Verdejo-García; Antoine Bechara; Emily C Recknor; Miguel Pérez-García
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Genetically correlated effects of selective breeding for high and low methamphetamine consumption.

Authors:  J M Wheeler; C Reed; S Burkhart-Kasch; N Li; C L Cunningham; A Janowsky; F H Franken; K M Wiren; J G Hashimoto; A C Scibelli; T J Phillips
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  A mechanistic account of striatal dopamine function in human cognition: psychopharmacological studies with cabergoline and haloperidol.

Authors:  Michael J Frank; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Mouse lines selected for alcohol consumption differ on certain measures of impulsivity.

Authors:  Clare J Wilhelm; Jamie M Reeves; Tamara J Phillips; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Effects of d-amphetamine on behavioral control in stimulant abusers: the role of prepotent response tendencies.

Authors:  Mark T Fillmore; Craig R Rush; Cecile A Marczinski
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Central serotonin depletion impairs both the acquisition and performance of a symmetrically reinforced go/no-go conditional visual discrimination.

Authors:  A A Harrison; B J Everitt; T W Robbins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of amphetamine, morphine, and CP 55, 940 on Go/No-Go task performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Wouter Koek; Lisa R Gerak; Charles P France
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Behavioral disinhibition in mice bred for high drinking in the dark (HDID) and HS controls increases following ethanol.

Authors:  Megan E Tipps; Travis M Moschak; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Dissociation of impulsive traits by subthalamic metabotropic glutamate receptor 4.

Authors:  Lukasz Piszczek; Andreea Constantinescu; Dominic Kargl; Jelena Lazovic; Anton Pekcec; Janet R Nicholson; Wulf Haubensak
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Cocaine self-administration behavior in inbred mouse lines segregating different capacities for inhibitory control.

Authors:  M Catalina Cervantes; Rick E Laughlin; J David Jentsch
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Mice bred for severity of acute alcohol withdrawal respond differently in a go/no-go task.

Authors:  Travis M Moschak; Katherine A Stang; Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 6.  An animal model of differential genetic risk for methamphetamine intake.

Authors:  Tamara J Phillips; Shkelzen Shabani
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.