Literature DB >> 21553989

Multisensory integration affects visuo-spatial working memory.

Fabiano Botta1, Valerio Santangelo, Antonino Raffone, Daniel Sanabria, Juan Lupiáñez, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigate how spatial attention, driven by unisensory and multisensory cues, can bias the access of information into visuo-spatial working memory (VSWM). In a series of four experiments, we compared the effectiveness of spatially-nonpredictive visual, auditory, or audiovisual cues in capturing participants' spatial attention towards a location where to-be-remembered visual stimuli were or were not presented (cued/uncued trials, respectively). The results suggest that the effect of peripheral visual cues in biasing the access of information into VSWM depend on the size of the attentional focus, while auditory cues did not have direct effects in biasing VSWM. Finally, spatially congruent multisensory cues showed an enlarged attentional effect in VSWM as compared to unimodal visual cues, as a likely consequence of multisensory integration. This latter result sheds new light on the interplay between spatial attention and VSWM, pointing to the special role exerted by multisensory (audiovisual) cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553989     DOI: 10.1037/a0023513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Where did that noise come from? Memory for sound locations is exceedingly eccentric both in front and in rear space.

Authors:  Franco Delogu; Phillip McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-06-13

Review 2.  The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Jinglong Wu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.

Authors:  Doug J K Barrett; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  A multisensory perspective of working memory.

Authors:  Michel Quak; Raquel Elea London; Durk Talsma
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  High cognitive load enhances the susceptibility to non-speech audiovisual illusions.

Authors:  Georgios Michail; Julian Keil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Intermediate, Wholistic Shape Representation in Object Recognition: A Pre-Attentive Stage of Processing?

Authors:  Jarrod Hollis; Glyn W Humphreys; Peter M Allen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Multisensory synchrony of contextual boundaries affects temporal order memory, but not encoding or recognition.

Authors:  Vincent van de Ven; Guyon Kleuters; Joey Stuiver
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-04-28

8.  Age-related decrease in motor contribution to multisensory reaction times in primary school children.

Authors:  Areej A Alhamdan; Melanie J Murphy; Sheila G Crewther
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.473

9.  Multisensory enhancement elicited by unconscious visual stimuli.

Authors:  Ayla Barutchu; Charles Spence; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.